EP 22: Back in the Saddle | The JudgMental Podcast
Show Notes
Christine is back! In this episode, Christine and Hugh reunite to discuss the latest in family law, courtroom culture, and the ongoing fight for due process. Broadcasting remotely, Christine shares her experiences from Florida and California, drawing comparisons to Kentucky’s legal landscape.
Key Topics Covered:
Christine’s return and remote podcasting update
Florida’s strict bar rules and the impact on attorney speech
Kentucky vs. Florida: Free speech, legal culture, and the First Amendment
Recap of the Louisville CLE (Continuing Legal Education) for family law
Adair v Emberton: What it means for FOC (Friend of the Court) testimony
Can attorneys waive client rights without consent? Panel debates and analogies to Miranda rights
The chaos of motion hour and the importance of due process
The role of FOCs and GALs (Guardians ad Litem) in family court
Published vs. unpublished opinions: Why it matters and what’s changing
White v Cole: The “invoking the rule” basics and courtroom fundamentals
Concerns about transparency, open courts, and the future of Louisville’s family court system
Christine’s reflections on California’s court system and the dangers of gaslighting parents
Notable Quotes:
“If you think you’re going to tell me what to say, how to say it, when to say it, or to whom to speak, you have the wrong girl.”
“It’s a court of law. I just don’t understand the amount of time wasted by them on this when they don’t even read motions.”
“The system, in my opinion, is in real trouble.”
Resources & Links:
Website: judge-y.com
Christine on TikTok/Instagram: @KentuckyChristine
YouTube & Instagram: @judge-y
Connect with Us:
We want to hear your stories! Share your experiences, questions, or feedback in the comments or reach out on social media.
Thank you for listening to The Judgmental Podcast. Don’t forget to subscribe, leave a review, and join us next time for more candid legal talk!
