Episode 31: Seaward
In this episode of the JudgMental podcast, Christine and Hugh dive deep into a recent family court case that has become a "hot mess express." They discuss the controversial agreed order that blurs the lines between the roles of a Guardian ad Litem (GAL) and a parenting coordinator, raising serious ethical and legal concerns. The hosts break down the differences between these roles, the implications of allowing a GAL to make binding decisions for parties, and the potential violations of attorney-client privilege.
Christine and Hugh also revisit the motion to recuse Judge Shelly Santry, exploring the appearance of conflicts of interest and the broader impact on the families involved. They reflect on the systemic issues in family court, the unintended consequences of creative legal solutions, and the importance of following established rules to protect clients.
Tune in for a candid, insightful discussion about the complexities of family law, the responsibilities of legal professionals, and why sometimes, starting over is the only way to fix a broken case.
Key topics:
The difference between GALs and parenting coordinators
Ethical and legal pitfalls in agreed orders
The motion to recuse Judge Shelly Santry
Systemic challenges in family court
The importance of clear roles and boundaries in legal representation
Don’t forget to follow us on YouTube and join the conversation in the comments!
