The JudgeMental Podcast – Episode 39: "Society Loses"
In this episode of The JudgeMental Podcast, hosts Hugh and Christine—two lawyers on a mission to bring transparency and accountability to the courts—dive into one of the wildest days in family court. They break down the drama surrounding a high-profile recusal motion, the culture of courtroom banter, and the sometimes shocking realities of judicial conduct.
Key topics include:
A behind-the-scenes look at the denial of a recusal motion in Shelly Sentry’s courtroom
The impact of judges appearing remotely and how it affects courtroom dynamics
The “good old boy” culture and its effect on public trust in the legal system
The role of guardians ad litem and the ethical dilemmas they face
The importance of zealous advocacy and the challenges attorneys encounter when pushing for judicial accountability
Reflections on how courtroom behavior shapes perceptions of fairness and justice
Hugh and Christine share candid critiques, personal stories, and sharp insights—always with unshakable honesty. Whether you’re a legal professional or just fascinated by the inner workings of the justice system, this episode offers a compelling, unfiltered perspective.
Mentioned in this episode:
The “judge-y” app and website: your tool for holding judges accountable and sharing your courtroom experiences.
Subscribe to The JudgeMental Podcast for more episodes that pull back the curtain on the legal world, and don’t forget to check out “judge-y” for more ways to get involved.
