Description

src="https://faif.us/static/img/cast/audio_mp3_button.png"/>

Bradley and href="http://www.softwarefreedom.org/about/team/#karen">Karen
discuss two debates going on in the free and open source software
community. One recent and seemingly inflated, and one long and
confusing.

Show Notes:

Segment 1 (03:12)

• Bradley wrote a href="http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2011/03/18/bionic-debate.html">blog
  post about the Bionic issues that were raised. (03:44)
• On the old oggcast, href="http://www.softwarefreedom.org/podcast/2010/jan/19/0x1F/">Karen
  and Bradley discussed the Android/Linux system and Bionic
  specifically. (04:09)
• Karen mentioned an href="http://softwarefreedom.org/podcast/2009/mar/03/0x08/">old oggcast
  where permissive vs. copyleft licensing was discussed. (06:19)
• Jake Edge wrote an LWN
  article that discussed Bionic (07:58)
• Bradley mentioned href="http://www.ipinfoblog.com/archives/licensing-law-issues-infringement-and-disclosure-risk-in-development-on-copyleft-platforms.html">Raymond
  Nimmer's blog that started the debate (10:52)
• Bradley also mentioned href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/edward-j-naughton/googles-android-contains-_b_836697.html">Edward
  Naughton's blog post and
  href="http://www.brownrudnick.com/nr/pdf/alerts/Brown%20Rudnick%20Advisory%20The%20Bionic%20Library-Did%20Google%20Work%20Around%20The%20GPL.pdf">paper
  on Bionic. (11:38)
• Raymond Nimmer is not href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Nimmer">David Nimmer, who
  is known for writings on copyright (18:10)
• There is now an href="http://identi.ca/group/disturbing">disturbing group on
  identica, which is more disturbing than a href="http://identi.ca/tag/disturbing">tag about
  disturbing. (19:15)
• href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/lawyer-behind-android-infringement-claim-has-?source=nww_rss">Joe
  Brockmeier did some research on Edward Naughton's ties to
  Microsoft. (20:05)
• Karen mentioned href="http://softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/ath5k-code-analysis.html">a
  paper on deep legal analysis of header files and href="http://softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/originality-requirements.html">on
  originality requirements in copyright (24:40)

Segment 2 (26:07)

• Karen wanted to clear up some confusion about the discussion
  last episode about the “Open Source” and “Free
  Software” terminology.

Send feedback and comments on the cast
to <oggcast@faif.us>.
You can keep in touch with Free as in Freedom on our IRC channel, #faif on irc.freenode.net, and
by following Conservancy on
identi.ca and and Twitter.

Free as in Freedom is produced by Dan Lynch
of danlynch.org.
Theme
music written and performed
by Mike Tarantino
with Charlie Paxson on drums.

href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"> src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png" hspace=10 />
The content
of this
audcast, and the accompanying show notes and music are licensed
under the href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Creative
Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 license (CC BY-SA 4.0).