First, The plaintiff purchased a wig from the defendant, but she wasn’t happy with the final product, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant claims she told the plaintiff how to maintain the wig, but she failed to follow those instructions and that’s why she’s unhappy.
Then, The defendant is the sugar daddy of the plaintiff’s daughter. However, the plaintiff is suing the defendant because he gave the defendant money to bail his daughter out of jail but hasn’t yet paid back the loan. The defendant argues he took the money in exchange for keeping the plaintiff’s daughter out of jail.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
