🏛️ The Poison Mystery That Changed Everything
🌟 Imagine this: all signs point to poisoning - foaming at the mouth, suspicious circumstances, clear motives - but the lab report shows absolutely nothing. No trace of poison anywhere. How do courts deliver justice when science goes silent?
💡 What You'll Discover:
- 🔍 How **Tulli's case** proved that missing forensic evidence doesn't mean missing justice
- ⚖️ The Five Golden Principles that make or break circumstantial evidence cases
- 🎯 Why **Santosh vs State** shows that suspicion alone can never convict anyone
- 💡 How Section 113B shifts the burden of proof in dowry death cases
🚀 Real Cases Discussed:
- 💎 Tulli's Death Case - When medical symptoms spoke louder than lab reports
- ⭐ Santosh et al vs State - Supreme Court's masterclass on weak circumstantial evidence
- 🏆 Sharad Birdhi Chand vs Maharashtra State - The landmark case that gave us the Five Golden Principles
🎭 The Legal Chess Game:
- 🎯 How prosecution lawyers build unbreakable chains of evidence
- 🛡️ Defense strategies to shatter circumstantial cases
- ⚡ When Section 106 forces accused persons to explain their silence
- 🔬 Why forensic failures don't always mean case failures
🎙️ This episode reveals the fascinating world where human interpretation meets scientific uncertainty, and shows exactly how our legal system balances the scales when evidence isn't crystal clear!
