🏛️ The Case That Changed Digital Evidence Forever
🌟 Imagine having crystal-clear CCTV footage of a crime scene, but instead of showing it in court, you rely on a witness saying "I saw the video, nothing important there." Sounds crazy? That's exactly what happened - and it backfired spectacularly!
💡 What You'll Discover:
- 🔍 Why the "best evidence rule" can make or break your case
- ⚖️ How hiding digital proof can legally backfire against you
- 🎯 The mandatory steps to make electronic evidence court-ready
- 💻 Why Section 65(b) certificates are non-negotiable for digital proof
🚀 Real Cases Discussed:
- 💎 R. Dinesh Kumar vs. State (2015) - The Supreme Court case that set new standards for digital evidence
- ⭐ Section 114 Illustration (g) - When courts can legally assume you're hiding something
- 🔧 Section 65(b) Evidence Act - The digital evidence authentication rulebook
🎯 Why This Matters Today:
- 📱 Every smartphone recording, CCTV footage, and call record needs proper legal handling
- 🏛️ Courts now demand "scientific temper" in investigations
- ⚡ One procedural mistake can destroy even the strongest digital evidence
🎙️ Whether you're a lawyer, investigator, or just curious about how justice works in our digital age, this episode reveals the hidden rules that determine whether electronic evidence helps or hurts your case!
