Listen

Cast

Description

Odds ratios show up everywhere in medical research—but do readers, journalists, and even researchers always know what they mean? In this episode, we tackle one of the most common statistical misunderstandings in science: treating odds ratios like risk ratios. Along the way, we explore puppy photos, fish photos, first-date hookups, sugary drinks, cardiac care, and a listener challenge that started with an informal study of five medical residents and a box of chocolate truffles. We explain why logistic regression produces odds ratios, when odds ratios can wildly exaggerate effects, and why some famous headlines turned out to be much less dramatic than they sounded.


Statistical topics


Methodological morals

References

More information on logistic regression and odds ratios:

When outcomes are common, odds ratios can exaggerate effect sizes. Alternatives include:

Converting Odds Ratios to Risk Ratios:

Example:

OR=0.51, baseline risk=93.3%

RR = 0.51 / [(1 − 0.933) + (0.933 × 0.51)]

= 0.51 / (0.067 + 0.476)

= 0.51 / 0.543


= 0.94

Thus, an odds ratio of 0.51 corresponds to a risk ratio of 0.94 when the baseline risk is 93.3%.

The corresponding unadjusted risk ratio is 86%/93.3%=0.92


Correction: In the episode, we stated that the adjusted risk ratio was 0.92. In fact, it is 0.94, as shown above. 0.92 is the unadjusted risk ratio. 


Kristin and Regina’s online courses: 

Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding  

Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis 

Medical Statistics Certificate Program  

Writing in the Sciences 

Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program 

Programs that we teach in:

Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program 

Find us on:

Kristin -  LinkedIn & Twitter/X

Regina - LinkedIn &ReginaNuzzo.com