The Paul Truesdell Podcast
Principal Storyteller and Analyst:
Paul Grant Truesdell, J.D., AIF, CLU, ChFC, RFC
Founder & CEO of The Truesdell Companies
The Truesdell Professional Building
200 NW 52nd Avenue
Ocala, Florida 34482
352-612-1000 - Local
212-433-2525 - New York
Truesdell Wealth, Inc.
https://truesdellwealth.com
The Truesdell Companies
https://truesdell.net
The Truesdell Companies was a proud sponsor of the Eirinn Abu benefit concert for Tunnel to Towers, on February 28th at the Circle Square arena in Ocala, Florida. For more information, visit: https://eirinnabu.com or https://eirinnabu.com/event/5760795/695871447/eirinn-abu-and-tunnel-to-towers-foundation-concert
Events
The Ultimate Christmas Gift
The Story Your Family Will Cherish Forever
Casual Conversations
Friday, June 13 – 6:30 pm
Reservations Required - Call or Text: 352-612-1000
Creative Estate Distribution
Beyond Essential Estate Planning Documents
Casual Conversations
Friday, June 27 – 6:30 pm
Reservations Required - Call or Text: 352-612-1000
No Cost or Obligation – Reservations - Seating Limited - Desserts with Coffee, Tea, - Beer, Wine, - Soft Drinks, or Mocktails.
Disclaimer
You are listening to the Paul Truesdell Podcast, sponsored by Truesdell Wealth and the other Truesdell Companies. Note. Due to our extensive holdings and our clients, always assume that we have a position in all companies discussed and that a conflict of interest exists. The information presented is provided for entertainment and informational purposes only. Truesdell Wealth is a Registered Investment Advisor.
Rough Outline
The Drudge Report Meets Adam Goldman: When Yellow Journalism Goes Full Circle
How a sarcastic FEMA joke exposed the intellectual bankruptcy of modern media and the death of common sense in American journalism
When obvious sarcasm becomes front-page news: A tale of two yellow journalism traditions and the readers too dim to tell the difference
From Hearst and Pulitzer to headlines and hot takes: Why America's media can't recognize wit when it slaps them in the face
The day American journalism proved Oscar Wilde right about sarcasm being the highest form of intelligence—by completely missing the point
Yellow journalism emerged in the 1890s when William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer waged circulation wars through sensationalized headlines, unverified claims, and manufactured outrage. Their scare tactics and emotional manipulation helped push America into the Spanish-American War by turning a tragic accident—the USS Maine explosion—into a conspiracy requiring military intervention. The defining characteristics of this journalistic disease remain unchanged: sensational headlines designed to grab attention rather than inform, reliance on anonymous sources with obvious agendas, partisan framing that transforms routine events into constitutional crises, and the deliberate manipulation of public emotion over facts.
Fast-forward to 2025, and we witness this same yellow journalism playbook being executed with surgical precision across the modern media landscape. The Drudge Report's latest headline screams "FEMA FAIL NEW CHIEF UNAWARE OF 'HURRICANE SEASON'" while Adam Goldman's New York Times piece breathlessly reports FBI "upheaval" and "fear and uncertainty." Both stories follow the identical template their predecessors used to sell papers and start wars.
But here's where things get deliciously ironic—and where the intellectual gulf between high and low-brow journalism becomes a chasm worthy of ridicule.
Let's examine the FEMA story with the kind of analytical precision that apparently escapes both Drudge readers and Reuters reporters. FEMA Director David Richardson, during what sources describe as a daily briefing, allegedly said he "had not been aware the country has a hurricane season." The Reuters story immediately notes that "it was not clear to staff whether he meant it literally, as a joke, or in some other context."
Anyone with functioning brain cells and a basic understanding of human communication would recognize this as obvious sarcasm. Picture the scene: You're the new director of a disaster agency, sitting in a room full of bureaucrats who've spent decades perfecting the art of bureaucratic resistance. Some perpetual pain-in-the-posterior asks, "Mr. Director, do you think FEMA is ready for hurricane season?"—the kind of loaded, gotcha question designed to create problems where none exist.
The intelligent response? A sarcastic deflection: "Oh, there's a hurricane season? I had no idea we needed to be aware of such things."
As Oscar Wilde observed, "Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, but the highest form of intelligence." The brilliance of sarcasm lies in its demand for cognitive sophistication from both speaker and audience. Research from Haifa University demonstrates that understanding sarcasm requires multiple brain processes—language areas interpret literal meaning while frontal lobes and the right brain understand social and emotional context. In essence, sarcasm serves as an instant IQ test.
And boy, did a lot of people fail spectacularly.
George Carlin, that master of intellectual comedy and surgical social commentary, understood this dynamic perfectly. Carlin had the verbal skill to make audiences laugh while dropping insightful messages, earning him the title "Master of Sociological Comedy" for his ability to point out hypocrisies. His humor appealed to those capable of grasping multiple layers of meaning simultaneously—the kind of audience that would immediately recognize Richardson's comment as obvious sarcasm rather than literal ignorance.
But here's the tragedy of our current media ecosystem: it's dominated by people who would be confused at a George Carlin performance and accept headlines from The Onion as gospel truth. The Drudge Report appeals to what we might charitably call the "headline-only reading demographic"—people who consume information in meme-sized chunks and mistake boldface type for journalism. These are the same intellectual giants who forward chain emails and believe everything they see on social media.
Meanwhile, Adam Goldman's supposedly sophisticated New York Times analysis suffers from the opposite problem—it takes itself so seriously that it misses the forest for the trees. Goldman transforms routine administrative changes into evidence of institutional collapse, treating every personnel decision as a potential constitutional crisis. His reporting style represents yellow journalism for the NPR crowd—longer sentences, more anonymous sources, but the same fundamental dishonesty dressed up in prestige journalism clothing.
The beautiful irony is that Richardson's sarcastic response—if that's indeed what it was—demonstrates exactly the kind of intellectual agility we should want in leadership positions. He deflected a loaded question with humor while simultaneously exposing the absurdity of the inquiry itself. In a sane world, this would be evidence of quick thinking and communication skills.
Instead, we get pearl-clutching from Democrats like Chuck Schumer, who apparently lacks the cognitive bandwidth to recognize sarcasm when he encounters it. Representative Bennie Thompson's response—"If you don't know what or when hurricane season is, you're not qualified to run FEMA"—perfectly illustrates the intellectual bankruptcy of taking obvious sarcasm at face value.
This is where The Onion's approach becomes instructive. America's finest news source succeeds precisely because it exaggerates truth to the point of absurdity, forcing readers to engage their critical thinking faculties. Headlines like "Local Man Passionate Defender Of What ...
