In this episode, Laurel answers a listener’s question of whether or not it’s within a movement teacher’s scope of practice to help people with their posture. Her answer is yes and no depending.
Here’s what else this episode gets into:
- How Laurel formerly identified as an alignment-based teacher and why she no longer does.
- The difference between “default-mode” alignment versus deliberate alignment.
- Alignment less in binary terms of good v. bad and more as a neutral tool for helping to restore variability and influence adaptations toward specific skills.
- Theory-induced blindness and the difficulty of noticing flaws in theories that inform your professional work.
- How our beliefs about posture can produce a nocebic effect.
- How Laurel sees posture and alignment instruction as well within a yoga teacher’s scope of practice, but how she also sees movement teachers stepping outside of their scope of practice in providing instruction.
Reference links:
SITE WIDE SALE
Paper: Therapists Perceptions of Optimal Sitting and Standing Posture
Paper: To flex or not to flex? Is there a relationship between lumbar spine flexion during lifting and low back pain? A systematic review with meta-analysis
Paper: Posture and time spent using a smartphone are not correlated with neck pain and disability in young adults: a cross-sectional study
Paper: Is neck posture subgroup in late adolescence a risk factor for persistent neck pain in young adults? A prospective study
Paper: Clinical measures of foot posture and ankle joint dorsiflexion do not differ in adults with and without plantar heel pain
Todd Hardgrove: Great New Paper on Targeting the Brain for Treatment of Pain
Sign up here for the Movement Logic Newsletter for course discounts and sales and a series of free pelvic floor exercises.
Watch the video of this episode at: www.movementlogictutorials.com/podcast
Want more Movement Logic?
Thanks for listening!
