Diversity gets measured. Belonging gets felt. What actually creates it in an organisation?
In this best-bits episode of Building Better Cultures, we delve back into Episodes 72 and 77 to hear about structural DEI accountability from Wema Hoover, and belonging as a fundamental human need in teams from Peter Docker. Both have operated at real scale, so this is practice rather than theory.
Wema Hoover is direct about where most organisations get stuck. The barrier isn't a lack of good intentions, it's that the good intentions stop at communication. Saying what you stand for feels like progress, and a statement posted in a moment of public attention feels like action, but neither survives contact with the following quarter. What actually moves things is a diagnostic: what do our hiring numbers look like, what do our leadership teams look like, can we measure impact rather than activity? Then expectations set explicitly with leadership groups, and consequences when those expectations aren't met, repeated until the work is simply how the organisation operates rather than a programme with a start and end date. Asked what leaders should do, her answer starts closer to home: look in the mirror. Educate yourself, understand where your own gaps are, create the space for dialogue, and pay attention to the people who don't have the networks or the sponsorship, because talent doesn't surface on its own in systems that were never designed to surface it.
Peter Docker builds belonging from the ground up, starting with a child who wants to be part of a group of friends and a street where neighbours look out for each other's kids. That gets him to a distinction worth borrowing: taking responsibility is not the same as being held accountable. One is chosen, the other is imposed, and people choose it when they feel they belong. He takes it to the Iraq deployment in 2003, where what mattered wasn't checking in on the task but checking in on the person, and then to the very ordinary version of the same thing for teams working apart: a postcard, a bar of chocolate, a call that isn't about work. He finishes on the strongest version of the argument. In genuinely extreme situations, people put themselves on the line for each other, and they don't do it because of rules or standards. They do it because they belong, and what works there works everywhere else too.
The common thread? Belonging isn't a programme or a policy. It's built in the small, deliberate things leaders do, and measured in what people choose to do when nobody is making them.
Good intentions are not the problem, stopping at them is. Most organisations know what they want to say. Far fewer check whether anything changed.
A statement is not a strategy. It's naive to think a post in a moment of public attention sustains anything on its own.
Start with the diagnostic. Hiring data, the make-up of leadership teams, and honest measurement of impact tell you where you actually are, which is where the work starts.
Expectations need consequences attached. Set them with leadership groups, be clear about what happens when they're not met, or you're describing an aspiration rather than running a business.
The goal is for it to stop being a programme. When it's embedded in how the organisation works, it no longer needs a banner.
Leaders look in the mirror first. Educating yourself and understanding your own gaps comes before trying to change anyone else.
Notice who doesn't have the network. Sponsorship and visibility are how talent gets discovered, and the systems were never built to do that evenly, so it has to be deliberate.
Taking responsibility is different from being held accountable. One is chosen and one is imposed, and people choose it when they feel part of something.
Check in on the person, not the task. In a war zone or on a Tuesday, the question that matters is how are you, not where are we on the deliverable.
Distance makes the small things bigger. A postcard, a chocolate bar or a call that isn't about work does more for connection than another meeting.
In extreme situations people put themselves on the line for each other, and not because of the rules. They do it because they belong, and what works there works in business too.
00:00 – Introduction: diversity gets measured, belonging gets felt
00:28 – Wema Hoover: what are the real barriers to equitable and inclusive cultures?
01:10 – Why a statement in the moment doesn't sustain change
01:30 – The diagnostic: hiring data, leadership teams, and measuring impact
02:30 – Setting expectations with leaders, and what happens when they're not met
03:10 – Embedding it so it stops being a programme
03:30 – What role do leaders play?
04:10 – Looking in the mirror first
04:50 – Creating the space for dialogue
05:30 – Seeing the people without the networks or the sponsorship
06:09 – Peter Docker: belonging as a fundamental human need
07:32 – Taking responsibility vs being held accountable
07:50 – The street, the neighbours, and looking out for each other's kids
08:44 – Iraq, 2003: checking in on the person rather than the task
09:38 – The small things that travel: a postcard, a chocolate bar, a phone call
10:26 – Why hybrid makes human connection matter more, not less
12:32 – People who put themselves on the line, and why they do it
13:05 – Wrap-up
EP072 – Wema Hoover: https://www.inspiringchange.ie/podcast/episode/1fb175bb/80-unlocking-the-power-of-diversity-building-a-culture-of-inclusion-and-equity-wema-hoover
EP077 – Peter Docker: https://www.inspiringchange.ie/podcast/episode/fa7c2f53/87-lead-from-behind-how-to-cultivate-healthy-cultures-and-empower-teams-peter-docker
LinkedIn | YouTube | Instagram
Connect with Scott McInnes: LinkedIn
belonging, diversity equity and inclusion, DEI, inclusion, workplace culture, leadership, accountability, sponsorship, psychological safety, hybrid working, human connection, teams, employee engagement, internal communications, military leadership, Wema Hoover, Peter Docker, Scott McInnes, Building Better Cultures, Inspiring Change, best bits, podcast compilation
