Inter-religious dialogue is the effort by individuals and organisations of different religious affiliations to exchange views on their commonalities and differences, reduce misunderstandings, and cooperate on shared goals such as peace or ecology. The relevance of the academic study of religion (Religionswissenschaft) to this dialogue is multifaceted, acting as both a historical initiator, a critical observer, and a resource provider.
Key aspects of its relevance include:
- Historical Foundation: The study of religion and modern inter-religious dialogue share common roots in the 19th-century fascination with "the foreign" and the 1893 World Parliament of Religions in Chicago, which was a turning point where religions first actively communicated the expectation of learning from one another.
- Provision of Expertise: Scholars act as resource givers, providing practitioners with essential information on religious traditions, scripture (such as introductions to the Quran), and specific themes like gender or ecology to facilitate informed exchange.
- Analysis of Learning Processes: Research examines how individuals learn in inter-religious settings, noting that it often involves a "double networking" where learners find anchor points in their own tradition to connect with aspects of the "other".
- Critical Reflection and "Boundary Work": The sources highlight that dialogue is not neutral; it often involves power dynamics and "boundary work". Scholars investigate how dialogue can sometimes reinforce the "World Religions Paradigm" by treating religions as fixed, static entities rather than fluid processes.
- The Debate on Engagement: There is an ongoing debate within the field between those who advocate for a "Watchtower" function—maintaining a strict distance to observe dialogue from the outside—and those who promote "Engaged Religious Studies", where scholars actively advise NGOs or serve on inter-religious boards.
- Typological Frameworks: Scholars provide categories to understand the nature of dialogue, such as distinguishing between polemical (who is right?), peace-promoting, cognitive (who are you?), and partnership-based (how can we improve the world?) interactions.
Ultimately, the study of religion helps to de-essentialise the participants in a dialogue; instead of seeing "Islam" or "Christianity" as monolithic blocks, it reveals them as diverse, changing systems influenced by their social and historical contexts.
To understand the scholar's role in this dialogue, one might see them as a mapmaker in a complex terrain: while the religious practitioners are the travellers seeking to build bridges between their lands, the scholar provides the detailed cartography that shows where the ground is firm, where the borders have shifted over time, and where hidden power currents might affect the journey.
To learn more about our work, visit http://theeastwestfoundation.org/ and sign up for our substack at Interfaiths | Iqbal Akhtar | Substack
