Listen

Description

The Trump administration is targeting the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Energy Star program for elimination as part of a broader reorganization and deregulatory effort focused on air pollution offices. This move is viewed as a significant step away from the previous administration's focus on climate change and energy efficiency. The Energy Star program, a voluntary labeling initiative for energy-efficient products, has been widely successful in saving consumers money on energy bills and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Its potential demise raises concerns about consumer choice, the ability to identify efficient products, and the future of energy efficiency efforts in the United States.

  1. Targeting of the Energy Star Program:
  1. Success and Popularity of Energy Star:
  2. The program is "extraordinarily popular, saves American families about $450 annually and may go away very soon." (The Washington Post)
  3. An estimated 90 percent of the public is aware of the Energy Star label. (The New York Times, The Washington Post)
  4. Since its start in 1992, the program has reduced energy costs by "more than $500 billion and prevented about 4 billion metric tons of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions." (AP/NPR, The Washington Post, Canary Media)
  5. For every dollar the federal government spends on the program, consumers save an estimated $350. (Canary Media)
  6. Energy Star has enjoyed bipartisan support until recently. (Steven Nadel, ACEEE, AP/NPR)
  7. It has motivated manufacturers to improve the efficiency of their appliances, with Energy Star-certified appliances now dominating many market segments (e.g., 96% of dishwashers). (The Washington Post)
  1. Impact of Energy Star's Potential Elimination:
  2. Losing Energy Star will make it "harder for consumers to have trustworthy information about products' energy use." (Sarah Gleeson, Project Drawdown, AP/NPR)
  3. Consumers will "have to pay more and work harder to identify which appliances will use the least energy and save the most money." (The Washington Post)
  4. Broader "All-Out War on Energy Efficiency":