Right to Travel | License vs Liberty | Constitutional Rights | Natural Rights | Public vs Private | Government Overreach
In this episode of Unchained Frequency, we break down one of the most misunderstood concepts in America today: the difference between a license and a liberty. Society has conditioned us to believe that freedom must be applied for, purchased, or granted by the State. But that’s not how rights work. A license exists only in the public/commercial realm, while liberty exists in the private — by birth.
We explore how government agencies blur those lines, how the courts have addressed the Right to Travel, and how individuals unknowingly contract themselves into regulated capacity.
This is not legal advice — it’s awareness. Awareness leads to comprehension. And comprehension leads to sovereignty of the mind.
Topics Covered:
- The legal meaning of a license vs. a right
- Why public and private do not mix
- How the Right to Travel has been recognized in case law
- How consent, contracts, and jurisdiction shape your status
- The psychological side of government authority and obedience
Primary Supreme Court opinions (read the opinions):
- Crandall v. State of Nevada, 73 U.S. 35 (1867). .
- Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116 (1958). .
- Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969). (See law-annotated summaries on Cornell/Justia). .
- Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999). (See Cornell / Justia for full text and commentary.) .
- Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943). .
- Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535 (1971). .
- State-action cases: Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948); Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U.S. 715 (1961); Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922 (1982); Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345 (1974); Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U.S. 991 (1982). .
- Ninth & Tenth Amendments and Annotated doctrines — see Law.Cornell (Legal Information Institute) pages for Amendment IX and Amendment X.
Stay unchained.
Your liberty existed before the State, and it exists without its permission.
