Description

If you’re studying for the LSAT, you’ve probably heard that Logic Games will soon be a thing of the past. But will they really? Why? When? And what will replace them?

Branden & Jelena break down the recent settlement in Binno v. LSAC, which may fundamentally change the LSAT in the next few years.

In this episode, you’ll find out . . .

1. What LSAC really committed to regarding Logic Games
2. Why plaintiff Angelo Binno previously sued the American Bar Association over the same issue (and was rejected by the Supreme Court)
3. How prospective law students with visual impairments dealt with the LSAT’s Logic Games section in the past
4. What current LSAT students who struggle with this section should do about Logic Games—keep studying, or wait?
5. When we can expect to see a change to the Analytical Reasoning section
6. What Analytical Reasoning is, anyway

Links and further resources from from this week’s episode:

Binno’s Complaint Against LSAC (PDF): https://bit.ly/36XnGhR

Joint Press Release from Binno & LSAC on Settlement: http://prn.to/3jJritb

LSAC’s Now-Deleted Second Statement: https://i.redd.it/k5bm8hjgbgr31.jpg

ABA Journal on the LSAC/Binno Settlement: http://bit.ly/3cZ2POW

Supreme Court Denies Cert to Binno’s ABA Suit: http://bit.ly/2Z36PFO

Jason Turkish’s Previous Lawsuit Over Bar Exam: http://bit.ly/3q5FW06

Google’s Indefatigable Lawyer who Just Happens to Be Blind: https://bit.ly/3jBZUNp

LSAC Current Volume Summary Report: http://bit.ly/2MGEbIo

33 Common LSAT Flaws: https://amzn.to/3efTuzY

Start Your BarMax Free Trial Now: https://go.onelink.me/3011142272/d02ba2de

Start Your LSATMax Free Trial: https://go.onelink.me/z1Zu/689fb4b4

The Road to 180: The Ultimate Guide to LSAT Prep (free on Kindle unlimited): https://amzn.to/3q4ifp1