Film: Good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die
Director: Gore Verbinski
Writer: Matthew Robinson
Starring: Sam Rockwell, Juno Temple, Michael Peña, Zazie Beetz, Haley Lu Richardson
Genre: Sci-Fi / Time-Loop Thriller / Dark Comedy
Release Year: 2025
IMDb: (Insert official link when available)
Michael and Dave explore Gore Verbinski's genre-blending sci-fi film Good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die, a time-loop story about a soldier attempting to stop a rogue artificial intelligence across repeated attempts. What begins as a chaotic, humorous sci-fi premise unfolds into a deeper philosophical discussion about repetition, control, and emotional detachment.
Is the film a messy but ambitious meditation on gamified existence, or does its spectacle drown its humanity? The hosts debate whether infinite retries lead to growth — or erode meaning altogether.
The episode examines whether repetition creates growth or emotional numbness. Unlike Groundhog Day, where the protagonist is trapped until he becomes empathetic, this film presents a character who can reset at will — raising the question of whether control over repetition removes the stakes of human experience. Ultimately, the discussion centers on whether hope lies in continuing the loop — or in learning to step outside it.
| Time | Segment |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | Intro — Welcome to Mindframes and film setup |
| 00:40 | Synopsis and premise discussion |
| 02:40 | Gore Verbinski's career and stylistic traits |
| 06:15 | Verbinski themes — characters trapped in systems |
| 09:30 | Writer Matthew Robinson and situational storytelling |
| 12:45 | Sam Rockwell as the emotional anchor of the film |
| 15:45 | Supporting cast: Juno Temple, Michael Peña, Zazie Beetz |
| 17:40 | Visual style, cinematography, and production design |
| 19:45 | Dave's review — spectacle, fun, and cinematic experience |
| 22:10 | Michael's review — messiness, tonal imbalance, and structure |
| 27:00 | Debate: Is the film visually spectacular? |
| 33:00 | Entering the Spoiler Section |
| 34:00 | Gamification and repetition as thematic core |
| 36:00 | Comparison to Groundhog Day — control vs entrapment |
| 40:00 | Hope, imperfection, and persistence (Dave's perspective) |
| 43:30 | Emotional detachment and numbness (Michael's perspective) |
| 47:00 | Does Sam Rockwell's character actually grow? |
| 52:00 | Homage, pastiche, and borrowing from genre films |
| 56:00 | Cult status, box office, and AI films in context |
| 59:30 | AI as character vs plot device — comparison to HAL |
| End | Closing reflections |
Dave: ★★★★☆ (4/5)
A messy but engaging film where persistence, relationships, and the journey matter more than perfection.
Michael: ★★★☆☆ (3/5)
Ambitious and thought-provoking, but structurally uneven and emotionally diluted by spectacle.
🌐 Website: https://mindframesfilm.com
📘 Facebook: https://facebook.com/mindframesfilm
🎙 Now Playing Network: https://nowplayingnetwork.net
📧 Email: info@mindframesfilm.com
