This episode discusses California cases and procedures in impacting making and challenging peremptory challenges to jurors and motions for reconsideration.
Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography
Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography
Sign up for Tim Kowal’s Weekly Legal Update
Cases and Laws mentioned in this episode
AB 3070 – New law governing Peremptory Challenges
Rule 8.108 – Appellate Extensions for Motions for Reconsideration
Branner v. Regents of Univ. of Cal. (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1043
Marshall v. Webster (Aug. 27, 2020, No. C088240) 2020 WL 5051525
Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 894
Rowan v. Kirkpatrick(Sept. 4, 2020, No. A160568).
King v. U.S. Bank National Association (2020) 52 Cal.App.5th 728
Pankey v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 61 [depublished]
Bolger v. Amazon.com, LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 431
Conservatorship of O.B. (2020) 9 Cal.5th 989
Thurston v. Fairfield Collectibles of Georgia, LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 1231
Margeson v. Ford Motor Co. (Sept. 22, 2020 Case No. B287445)
Martinez v. O'Hara (2019) 32 Cal.App.5th 853
Pavone v. State Bar of California (2:20-cv-07193)
Disclaimer: The views expressed by our guest, James Mixon, are his own and do not reflect the official position of the California Court of Appeal or the California Judicial Branch. AI technology and legal standards are rapidly evolving, listeners should verify current rules and consult qualified attorneys before implementing AI tools in their practice. Attorneys must independently verify all legal citations and comply with applicable rules of professional conduct.
