FAN MAIL--We would love YOUR feedback--Send us a Text Message
The Watergate story most of us learned feels cinematic: fearless reporters, shadowy parking garages, and a presidency brought to heel by truth-tellers. We take a different path—back through court records, publishing timelines, and the motives of the people who leaked—so we can separate what happened from what we were sold. Drawing on Jeff Shepard’s deep archival work, along with Max Holland’s and Jim Hougan’s challenges to the canon, we examine how Mark Felt’s identity as Deep Throat reshaped the legend and why his ambitions matter to the credibility of the leaks. We look at what prosecutors already knew, how quickly the bestselling narrative was rushed into print, and the unusual judicial turns that steered the legal endgame.
If you’re ready to rethink Watergate with fresh eyes and stronger standards, this conversation is for you.
Key Points from the Episode:
• the official Watergate narrative set against counter-evidence
• Mark Felt’s motives and credibility as Deep Throat questioned
• what prosecutors knew versus what the press reported
• publication timelines and the rush to cement a story
• Judge Sirica, the grand jury “road map,” and legal strategy
• how appendices, memos, and timelines change the picture
• victors, vanquished, and the books that shaped public memory
• practical habits for weighing leaks, sources, and claims
Be sure to check out our show page at TeamMojoAcademy.com, where we have everything we discussed in this podcast as well as other great resources
Other resources:
Geoff Shepard's incredible website
Want to leave a review? Click here, and if we earned a five-star review from you **high five and knuckle bumps**, we appreciate it greatly!
