In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Davitt Jones Bould's Head of Legal Training, and Property Litigation Partner Jonathan Warner-Reed to discuss Mackenzie v Cheung and Infinity. Jonathan provides insights into the recent Court of Appeal case where he represented the successful respondent.
Richard and Jonathan analyse the interpretation of property covenants, and grants of modification. This case holds relevance for stakeholders involved in developments of any size. They assess the background to the case, reminding us of the importance of planning permission when it comes to restrictive covenants. Additionally, Richard and Jonathan elaborate on the reasoning behind the decision, addressing the impact on conveyancers.
Cases mentioned:
Mackenzie vs Cheung & Infinity [2024]
Mayner v Payne [1914]
Eagling v Gardner [1970]
Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:
Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email djb.events@djblaw.co.uk for information and booking.
This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.
