Reevaluating Spinal Motion Restriction: Evidence Update
In this episode of Wilderness Medicine Updates, host Dr. Patrick Fink delves into the evolving guidelines and practices concerning spinal motion restriction. Drawing from historical dogma and modern research, Patrick explores the inefficacies and potential harms of traditional spinal immobilization tools like rigid spine boards and cervical collars. Instead, he advocates for more flexible, evidence-based approaches such as using well-padded surfaces and coaching patients to minimize their own motion. Key points from a comprehensive literature review by the National Association of EMS Physicians and other authoritative bodies are discussed, highlighting the shift from immobilization to motion restriction and its practical implications. Listeners are urged to stay updated with current evidence and consult medical directors before altering their practices.
Links
Ep. 14 - Spinal Immobilization Guidelines Update
2018 ACEP/NAEMSP Sminal Motion Restriction Position Statement
Chapters
00:00 Introduction to Wilderness Medicine Updates
00:42 Historical Perspective on Spinal Immobilization
01:44 Transition to Spinal Motion Restriction
03:30 Review of Recent Literature
05:40 Key Findings on Spinal Motion and Neurological Outcomes
09:30 Effectiveness of Backboards and Cervical Collars
12:10 Potential Harms of Immobilization Tools
16:38 Practical Recommendations and Future Directions
21:48 Conclusion and Final Thoughts
As always, thanks for listening to Wilderness Medicine Updates, hosted by Patrick Fink MD FAWM.
Connect with us by email at wildernessmedicineupdates@gmail.com.
You can pay us a compliment and share the show with a new listener on any popular platform here.
Connect with us on social!
