Can a single oath determine who gets to practise law in Canada?
Gavin Tighe and Stephen Thiele unpack a fascinating Alberta Court of Appeal decision that struck down a mandatory oath of allegiance for lawyers as unconstitutional.
Through the case of Amarjeet Singh Dhariwal, a Canadian born Sikh lawyer who refused to swear allegiance to the Crown on religious grounds, the discussion explores how freedom of religion, the rule of law, and professional licensing collide.
They examine why sincerity of belief mattered, how the Law Society of Alberta failed to justify the oath under the Charter, and what this ruling means for lawyers, regulators, and professional bodies across the country.
Along the way, they raise deeper questions about tradition, citizenship, and whether symbolic rituals still have a place in modern legal practice.
Listen For
:01 Are religious convictions absolutely protected under the Canadian Charter?
2:32 Can a professional oath be unconstitutional?
5:30 Does being born in Canada change the obligation to swear allegiance?
9:43 How do courts assess sincerity of religious belief?
15:07 Why did Alberta lose the Charter challenge?
Leave a rating/review for this podcast with one click
Contact Us
Gardiner Roberts website | Gavin email | Stephen email
