Interested in being a guest? Email us at admin@evankirstel.com
A 2005 malware sample sounds like ancient history, until it looks like cyber sabotage that may predate Stuxnet. We sit down with Jags from SentinelOne’s Sentinel Labs to unpack Fast 16, a rare framework that doesn’t just break computers, it quietly corrupts high precision calculations. If you’ve ever treated simulation results, engineering models, or AI outputs as “the answer,” this conversation will make you pause.
We walk through the unexpected discovery path: a curious reference tied to the Shadow Brokers leak, years of researchers staring at a strange sample that “felt important” but refused to give up its secrets, and the moment an internal project using AI for reverse engineering helped unlock what Fast 16 was built to do. Along the way, we connect the dots to the Stuxnet era, cyber threat intelligence “paleontology,” and why truly high end nation state toolkits look like platforms, not one off scripts.
Then we get uncomfortably current. Sabotaging calculations is an integrity attack, and integrity is the foundation of modern scientific computing, cloud workloads, and frontier AI model training. We talk about how subtle degradation can waste millions, derail decision making, and even turn teams against their own experts. We close with practical lessons for CISOs and enterprise leaders: invest in visibility, telemetry, and log retention before the crisis, and start treating output verification as a core security problem.
Subscribe for more deep dives on cyber sabotage, APT tradecraft, and AI security, and if this made you rethink what “trust” means in computing, share it and leave a review. What system in your world would be hardest to verify?
Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify
More at https://linktr.ee/EvanKirstel
