Listen

Description

Send a text

Episode 57 Cellulitis

Shoot me any comments or questions @Rotation2ptoh  on X

Intro Music: KI Instrumental (Rock Celtic) by Lyrium-2025

Outro Music: Dark Countdown my Head in the Clouds by Alex Grohl

Courtesy of Pixabay under Creative Commons non-commercial use.

Produced by: Todd Fredricks DO MSS 

Edited by: Todd Fredricks DO MSS

 Answers for Episode 56 Herpes Simplex

Question 1

A 58-year-old man who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation 3 months ago presents with painful vesicular lesions on the vermilion border of the lower lip that have persisted despite 10 days of high-dose intravenous acyclovir (10 mg/kg every 8 hours) with documented adherence and adequate renal dosing. Viral culture confirms HSV-1. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

C) Obtain genotypic or phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and consider transition to foscarnet or cidofovir pending results 

Question 2

A 45-year-old woman with a history of solid organ transplantation is hospitalized for recurrent genital HSV-2 lesions unresponsive to 14 days of appropriately dosed intravenous acyclovir. Phenotypic susceptibility testing shows an EC₅₀ within the susceptible range, yet lesions continue to worsen. Which of the following is the most likely explanation for this clinical-phenotypic discordance?

A)   Presence of an undetected minority drug-resistant variant within the viral quasispecies 

Question 3

In the management of suspected acyclovir-resistant HSV infection in an immunocompromised patient, which of the following statements regarding alternative antiviral agents is most accurate according to current evidence?

A) Pritelivir and amenamevir are generally well tolerated with fewer adverse effects than foscarnet or cidofovir and do not require thymidine kinase activation 

Paper for Next Week:

Sabat, R., Alavi, A., Wolk, K., Wortsman, X., McGrath, B., Garg, A., & Szepietowski, J. C. (2025). Hidradenitis suppurativa. Lancet, 405, 420–438. 

Rotations  2.0 is copyrighted. But you can use any content from the podcast for non-commercial purposes under Creative Commons….BUT, BUT, BUT, you must cite Rotations 2.0 and Todd Fredricks DO MSS as the source of the material AND AND AND you cannot alter or edit the content in any manner without expressed permission of Todd Fredricks DO MSS.

Rotations 2.0 is made possible by the generous understanding and accommodation of my beloved institution, Ohio University. The comments and ideas expressed on Rotations 2.0 are that of the content creators alone and may not reflect official policy or the opinion of the Ohio University, the State of Ohio, or the US Government or any other state, person or governmental agency.

Listeners interested in specifics from the paper authors should contact them directly through their respective institutions.

Any therapeutic ideas discussed should not be taken as any kind of medical advice or recommendations by the content creators and the content creators are not offering medical advice but discussing topics from an academic perspective. Listeners seeking advice about any medical care or decision-making should consult their own physician or medical provider and the content creators of Rotations 2.0 assume no liability for any listener's care or decision-making stemming from the topics discussed on Rotations 2.0.