PRP vs Stem Cells for Knee Arthritis: What Really Works?

Description

Wondering whether PRP or stem cell therapy is better for your knee pain?

In this video, we break down PRP vs stem cell therapy for knee pain in clear, practical terms so you can understand your options before committing to surgery. We explain how both platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cell therapy use your own cells to support healing, but are designed for different stages of joint damage. PRP is often better for injuries, inflammation, chronic tendon problems, and early arthritis, while stem cell therapy may be more appropriate for advanced or “bone-on-bone” arthritis when you’re trying to delay or avoid knee replacement.

You’ll learn:

-When PRP is typically recommended vs stem cells

-How these regenerative treatments are performed

-The difference between fat-derived, bone marrow, and umbilical stem cells

-Why movement and joint health are essential for long-term longevity

Our goal is to help you make an informed decision about PRP vs stem cell therapy for knee pain, not to replace medical advice from your own provider.

Timestamps:

00:00 - PRP vs stem cells: which works better?

00:20 - How PRP and stem cells support healing

00:42 - Rotator cuff PRP success story

01:26 - When PRP is best: injuries, inflammation & early arthritis

02:17 - When stem cells are best: advanced degeneration & arthritis

02:41 - Where stem cells come from: fat, bone marrow, umbilical sources

03:48 - Why we often prefer fat-derived stem cells & banking options

05:45 - PRP vs stem cells for knee pain: key decision factors

06:53 - PRP for arthritis: symptom relief vs long-term regeneration

07:29 - Stem cells for “bone-on-bone” arthritis and joint repair

08:37 - Alternatives to knee replacement: what to consider before surgery