Forensically speaking, blood spatter analysis isn’t the most reliable. Delve further into the details with Kylie and Rory this week as they discuss the forensic bind between the legal cases of Warren, Tim, and David. Also hear about one of the (in Kylie’s opinion) worst so-called experts we’ve encountered in our journey so far.
Content warnings - lots of blood talk, murder
https://www.transformationsnetwork.com/post/8-online-mental-health-resources-anyone-can-access
References:
http://www.wcojp.org/bevel-credibility.html
https://www.bevelgardner.com/expertshttps://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/05/31/magazine/bloodstain-pattern-analysis-timeline.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloodstain_pattern_analysis
https://www.propublica.org/article/joe-bryans-attorneys-ask-for-new-trial-say-murder-conviction-built-on-faulty-forensics
https://features.propublica.org/blood-spatter/joe-bryan-conviction-blood-spatter-forensic-evidence/
https://signalscv.com/2021/07/blood-spatter-familial-matters-in-cierzan-murder-trial/
https://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/blood/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/expert_witnesshttps://investigatinginnocenceblog.com/tag/rod-englert/
https://darliefacts.com/blood-evidence/
https://seoklaw.com/legal-news/the-innocent-man-the-story-of-ronald-williamson/
https://innocenceproject.org/cases/dennis-fritz/
And Justice For None, The life and death of an innocent man. By Mary Ann West.
https://abcnews4.com/news/local/murdaugh-wants-forensic-analyst-barred-from-testifying-about-blood-spatter-in-murder-trial
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/25/us/alex-murdaugh-trial-names/index.html
