I’m standing outside the New York courthouse, just a year after Donald Trump’s historic conviction for falsifying business records related to the alleged hush money scheme—hard to believe it’s only been twelve months since a jury of twelve New Yorkers delivered that verdict. The courtroom drama was thick, with Trump’s legal team, then led by Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, fiercely pushing back at every turn. Inside, Trump’s own words echoed through the chamber as he declared, “I won the election in a massive landslide, and the people of this country understand what’s gone on. This has been a weaponization of government,” right during sentencing.
The battle didn’t stop there. Trump’s attorneys argued vehemently that the evidence used in his trial—social media posts from his official presidential Twitter account and critical testimony from Hope Hicks, his former communications director—should have been inadmissible. They contended that, especially after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling that expanded the scope of presidential immunity, much of that information couldn’t be used against a sitting or former president.
But Judge Juan Merchan wasn’t persuaded. Even before Trump’s January sentencing, his legal team tried to leverage that Supreme Court decision to get the case thrown out, yet both New York appeals courts and the Supreme Court itself rejected the effort. In a brief unsigned opinion, the nation’s highest court said, “The alleged evidentiary violations at President-Elect Trump's state-court trial can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal.”
Despite these setbacks, Trump’s legal defense bench has evolved. Todd Blanche and Emil Bove have since risen to top positions at the Department of Justice. Just this week, Trump announced plans to nominate Bove—who orchestrated a significant purge at the DOJ before his Senate confirmation—to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It’s a striking twist, considering Bove’s role in defending Trump during his most contentious legal battles.
Meanwhile, legal scrutiny over Trump’s executive actions continues beyond the hush money case. On May 29, a federal court in Washington, D.C., ruled against Trump’s emergency tariffs, with Judge Rudolph Contreras deeming them unlawful and issuing a preliminary injunction. The Department of Justice is expected to seek a review, but the momentum in federal court is clear: Trump’s legal and political maneuvers are under intense examination on multiple fronts.
As the anniversary of his conviction marks another chapter in this unprecedented saga, Donald Trump stands as both a former president and a criminal defendant, tenaciously fighting legal battles that continue to shape the national conversation and test the boundaries of presidential power and accountability.
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
