This memo outlines a strategic proposal for executives to manage the cognitive dividend created by the decline of traditional software interfaces and the rise of agentic AI. The author argues that reducing coordination friction will reclaim thousands of hours, which must be treated as strategic capital rather than being wasted on mindless speed. To avoid "organisational noise," the framework suggests redirecting this newfound time toward high-value tasks like precise problem definition and rigorous human verification. By implementing a "Human Pause" for high-stakes decisions, leaders can ensure that AI systems are guided by clear intent and ethical boundaries. Ultimately, the text highlights that future competitive advantages will belong to companies that prioritise human judgment and depth over mere mechanical acceleration. Read the article.
About the Author - Greg Twemlow writes and teaches at the intersection of technology, education, and human judgment. He works with educators and businesses to make AI explainable and assessable in classrooms and boardrooms — to ensure AI users show their process and own their decisions. His cognition protocol, the Context & Critique Rule™, is built on a three-step process: Evidence → Cognition → Discernment — a bridge from what’s scattered to what’s chosen. Context & Critique → Accountable AI™. © 2025 Greg Twemlow. “Context & Critique → Accountable AI” and “Context & Critique Rule” are unregistered trademarks (™).
