Investigator Bill Paatalo joins Charles Marshall to discuss bank employee weaknesses and lack of credibility in depositions and affidavits. Chase bank 'witnesses', and bank witnesses in general, know little about the loan in which they are deposed, beyond what the computer screen shows. Under oath, the bank employee will parrot information the bank's attorney coached them on prior to their deposition. If you are able to drill-down, it becomes obvious that the person 'with the most knowledge', knows nothing regarding the travel of the loan, assignments or current holder in due course. Bank witnesses can provide a balance, the name of the servicer, and who claims to own the note; but know nothing about payment proceeds from insurance/settlements or when the note was endorsed or by who. The bank employee relies on hearsay and and erroneous information on a screen to foreclose. Chase employee Rosemary Martin inundated the court with a ream of mortgage documents and statements that had the appearance of validity, but when placed under oath had no information relevant to the Plaintiff’s loan. See Martin deposition here. Even former in-house Chase counsel are oblivious in regards to the operations, documentation and validity of documents. The loans are defective, and only the illusion keeps the ownership facade alive. Investigator Bill Paatalo Office: (406) 328-4075 bill.bpia@gmail.com www.bpinvestigativeagency.com Not legal advice
