Neil Garfield and southern California attorney Charles Marshall discuss the recent Massachussetts case US Bank v. Bolling. For years legal presumptions attached to "facially valid" documents and the banks and servicers were able to argue through their sham surrogates ("successors") that any inquiry beyond the paper trail was irrelevant because the the issue had already been decided in the early motions of the case wherein those legal presumptions were used to sustain the implied perspective of the banks, servicers, and their surrogate successors. The tide has changed. Charles Marshall, Esq. attorney in Northern California joins us again as the featured attorney. Charles has been a long time supporter of the livinglies blog and has contributed to the analysis and strategies that are reported on the blog. He has exceptional critical thinking skills and the ability to understand the strategic winds that are blowing. Things are changing rapidly. We'll be talking about Yvanova, Keshtgar, Lundy, TILA Rescission and current trends. Charles Marshall Law Offices of Charles T. Marshall 415 Laurel St., #405 San Diego, CA 92101 cmarshall@marshallestatelaw.com Phone 619.723.7071 Fax 866.575.7413
