This is no longer the Stone Age it is the “Common Sense Age” The age of the Great Pyramid of Giza has been debated for many years. There are those who say it is 3,100 years old, and then there are those who claim a far, more ancient date of construction. The strength of this argument is that we can enjoy this man-made mountain which can be seen in plain sight. The weakness of this argument is that this “elephant in the room” has no feature that is inexplicably obvious to the naked eye. A feature that can not be argued and settled in one brief statement. The two piers in the Bahamas, the Bimini Road (BR) and the Andros Platform (AP) also have strengths and weaknesses. Their weakness are that the tide, currents, and elements in the water that weaken and eventually change objects in the oceans are real. The wind, sand and chemical erosion that are slowly destroying the exterior of the Great Pyramid are different and a lot less destructive than underwater factors. But when we get to the strength of these giant underwater structures, simple plain logic wins the day. The strength of which we speak is the obvious. The BR and AP are roughly built with the same megalithic stone sizes. The main difference is that one site is above ground and the others are under water. The first obvious question is, why would someone build such a gigantic structure, that is obviously one that is meant to be above and not below water? The only way they work is above the waves where people may have access to them and use them for what they were built for. The deal breaker is that the time period that would put these giant structures above water would be before the last Ice Age ended. That would be 8-10,000 years ago. In that age there was no Rome, there was no Greece, Mesopotamia, or civilizations in China who could have reached the Americas, much less build these types of structures.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/o-ye-drybones-archive--6500709/support.
