Jonathan Turley, a distinguished law professor from Georgetown University, previously gave his professional sentiments regarding the legal predicaments surrounding Hunter Biden, following a jury verdict earlier this month. This verdict found the president's son guilty on three charges related to his 2018 acquisition of a .38-caliber revolver. The deliberation took just over three hours before the jurors announced their decision. Beyond this conviction, Turley stressed the necessity for Hunter's legal counsellors to divert their attention back to a lingering tax case, an issue that's far from resolved. The reasoning is simple: any courtroom proceedings from here on will be conducted with Hunter considered a convicted felon. This, undoubtedly, could allow for a more difficult legal battle ahead, a detail Turley shared during his conversation with Fox News host Harris Faulkner on 'Faulkner Focus'. In contrast, Turley indicated that there's an emergence of a third front. He highlighted how Congress recently referred to what he considers a substantive claim for an investigation into potential perjury on the part of Hunter Biden. This follows his testimony before Congress, stirring up further complications for the First Son. Speculations abound with Turley and others positing that Merrick Garland, US Attorney General, might choose to disregard this new referral. However, their shared concern centres around the House of Representatives seeming possession of irrefutable evidence supporting their perjury allegations against Hunter. Turley maintains it's difficult to reconcile Hunter’s congressional testimony with the truth, making this a considerably graver offense, and an issue Garland will have to deal with. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
