Most admins don’t realize: Copilot isn’t just a shiny feature drop—it’s a moving target. Microsoft updates how permissions, plugins, and licensing interact frequently, and if you’re not paying attention, you can end up with gaps in control or even unintended data exposure. In this session, we’ll walk through the settings Microsoft rarely highlights but that shape how your users actually experience Copilot. We’ll cover web access controls, licensing pitfalls, Edge limitations, Loop and DLP gaps, and preparing for Copilot agents. Along the way, I’ll show you the single setting that changes how Copilot handles external web content—and exactly where to find it. And that first hidden control is where we’ll start.The Hidden Web Access SwitchOne of the least obvious controls lives in what Microsoft calls the web access setting—or depending on your tenant, a Bing-related plugin toggle—that decides whether Copilot can reference public content. Out of the box, this is usually enabled, and that means Copilot isn’t just referencing your company’s documents, emails, or SharePoint libraries. It can also surface insights from outside websites. On paper, this looks like a productivity win. Users see fuller answers, richer context, and fewer dead ends. But the reality is that once external content starts appearing alongside internal data, the boundary between controlled knowledge and uncontrolled sources gets blurry very quickly. Here’s a simple way to picture it. A user types a question into Copilot inside Outlook or Word. If the external switch is enabled, Copilot can pull from public sites to round out an answer. Sometimes that means helpful definitions or Microsoft Learn content. Other times, it may return competitor material or unvetted technical blogs. The information itself may be freely available, but wrapped inside your Microsoft 365 tenant, users may misread it as company-vetted. That’s where risk creeps in—when something that feels official is really just repackaged public content. The complication is not that Microsoft hides this setting on purpose, but that it doesn’t announce itself clearly. There’s no banner saying “Web results are on—review before rollout.” Instead, you’ll usually find a toggle somewhere in your Search & Intelligence center or within Copilot policies. The exact wording may vary by tenant, so don’t rely on documentation alone. Go into your own admin portal and confirm the label yourself. This small control has an outsized impact on Copilot behavior, and too many admins miss it by assuming the defaults are fine. So what happens if you leave the setting as-is? Think about a controlled test. In your pilot environment, try asking Copilot to summarize a competitor’s website or highlight recent news from a partner. Watch carefully where that content shows up. Does Copilot present it inline as if it’s part of your document? Does it distinguish between external and internal sources? Running those tests yourself is the only way to understand how it looks to your end users. Without validation, you run the risk that staff copy-and-paste external summaries into presentations or strategy documents with no awareness of the source. Different organizations make different calls here. Some deliberately keep the web access switch on, valuing the extra speed and context of blended answers. Others—especially in industries like finance, government, or healthcare—lock it down to maintain strong separation from uncontrolled content. For smaller companies chasing efficiency, the productivity benefit may outweigh the ambiguity in sourcing, but at least administrators in those environments made a conscious choice about the trade-off. The real danger is leaving it untouched and inheriting risks by accident. One constant you’ll see, regardless of industry, is the tug-of-war between productivity and policy. Users often expect Copilot to deliver quick definitions or surface background information. If you disable external results, those same users may complain that “Copilot worked fine yesterday, but now it’s broken.” The support desk impact is real. That’s why communication is critical. If you flip the switch off, you need to tell people upfront what they’ll lose. A useful script is: “Copilot won’t bring in public web results by default. That means slower answers in some cases. If there’s a business need for outside data, we’ll provide other ways to get it.” Short, clear explanations like that save you dozens of tickets later. The key takeaway here is intentionality. Whether you choose to allow, block, or selectively enable web access, make it a conscious choice instead of living with the default. Don’t just trust what you think the toggle does—go test it with scenarios that matter to your environment. In fact, your action step right now should be to pause and check this control inside your tenant. Confirm where it is, validate what it returns, and decide how you’ll explain it to your users. Once you’ve wrapped your head around how external data blurs into your Copilot experience, the next challenge isn’t about risk at all—it’s about waste. Specifically, the way licenses get assigned can create landmines that sit quietly until adoption stalls.Licensing LandminesLicensing is where many Copilot rollouts start to wobble. The real challenge isn’t in the purchase—signing off on seats is straightforward. The trouble shows up when administrators assign them without a strategy for usage, role alignment, or ongoing adjustment as Microsoft keeps evolving its product lineup. Too often, licenses get handed out based on hierarchy rather than day-to-day workflow. Executives or managers might receive seats first, while the employees who live inside Excel, Word, or Teams all day—the ones with the most to gain—end up waiting. Microsoft 365 licensing has always required balancing, and Copilot adds a new layer of complexity. You may already be used to mixing E3 and E5, adding Power BI or voice plans, and then aligning cost models. Copilot behaves a little differently because seat distribution has mechanisms that let admins prioritize access, but they’re not always clear in practice. Some admins think of these as rigid or permanent allocations, when in fact they’re better treated as flexible controls to monitor continually. The important part is to check your own tenant settings to see how prioritization is working and verify whether seats flow to the users who actually need them, rather than assuming the system does it automatically. One trap is assuming usage will “trickle down.” In reality, many large environments discover their utilization is far lower than purchase numbers. Licenses can sit idle for months if no one checks the reports. That’s why it’s worth reviewing your Microsoft 365 admin center or equivalent tenant reporting tools for license and usage data. If you’re unsure where those reports are nested in your admin interface, set aside a short session to navigate your portal with that specific goal. These numbers often reveal that a significant chunk of purchased seats go untouched, while heavy users remain locked out. Uneven allocation doesn’t just waste budget—it fragments adoption. If only a thin slice of staff have Copilot, workflows feel inconsistent. Imagine a workflow where one person drafts an outline with Copilot, but their colleagues cannot extend or refine it with the same tool. The culture around adoption becomes uneven, and the organization has no reliable baseline for measuring actual impact. That fragmentation creates just as much strain as overspending because the technology never feels integrated across the company. Flexibility matters most when Microsoft shifts terms or introduces new plan structures. If your licenses are assigned in ways that feel static, reallocation can become a scramble. Admins sometimes find themselves pulling access midstream and redistributing when tiers change. That kind of disruption undermines trust in the tool. Treating seats as a flexible pool—reallocated based on data, not politics—keeps you positioned to adapt as Microsoft updates rollout strategies and bundles. Admins who manage licensing well tend to follow a rhythm. First, they pilot seats in smaller groups where impact can be measured. Then, they establish a cadence—monthly or quarterly—for reviewing license reports. During those reviews, they identify inactive seats, reclaim them, and push them to users who are already showing clear adoption. A guiding principle is to prioritize seats for employees whose daily tasks produce visible gains with Copilot, like analysts handling repetitive documentation or customer-facing staff drafting large volumes of email. By rotating seats this way, tenants stabilize costs without stifling productivity growth. It’s important to stress that Microsoft hasn’t given exhaustive instructions here. Documentation explains basic allocation methods but does not cover the organizational impacts, so most admins build their own playbooks. Best practice that’s emerging from the field looks like this: don’t position licenses as permanent ownership, run pilots early before scaling wide, establish a regular review cycle tied to measurable metrics, and keep reallocation flexible. Think of it less as software purchasing and more like resource management in the cloud—you shift resources to where they matter most at the moment. If license hygiene is ignored, the effects show up quickly. Costs creep higher while adoption lags. Staff who could be saving hours of manual effort are left waiting, while unused seats slowly drain budget. The smart mindset is to treat Copilot licenses as a flexible resource, measured and reassigned according to return on investment. That’s what turns licensing from a headache into a long-term enabler of successful adoption. Of course, even if you get licensing right, another layer of complexity emerges when you look at how users try to work with Copilot inside the browser. Expectations
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-modern-work-security-and-productivity-with-microsoft-365--6704921/support.
Follow us on:
LInkedIn
Substack
