Opening: The Generative TrapMicrosoft’s Generative Pages look like the final, glorious victory for low‑code—the moment the spreadsheet crowd finally caught up to the coders. You type a sentence, press enter, and GPT‑5 obediently assembles a working React page that talks to Dataverse, decorates itself with orange flair, and politely runs on first try. Cue applause, confetti, and a brief illusion that we’ve transcended the need for developers entirely.Yes, it looks effortless. A user describes a dashboard, and within seconds the app agent conjures data grids, filters, even export buttons. Text becomes React. And because it’s built right inside Power Apps, it feels safe—regulated, sandboxed, like the rest of the platform. What could possibly go wrong?Everything.That tidy UI hides the quiet click of a lock disengaging. The magical instant when you whisper, “Edit Code,” and the platform hands you the keys—plus the entire mortgage. Each regenerated line of JSX isn’t a convenience; it’s a liability you now own. A Trojan Horse dressed in productivity, wheeled straight past governance and security review.The promise is autonomy. The price is maintenance. You didn’t hire a developer; you became one, minus the salary and version‑control habits.Here’s the absurd part: someone decided that giving citizen makers direct React access was empowerment. Apparently, years of runaway Excel macros and untested Power Fx formulas didn’t teach us enough humility. So Microsoft wrapped this chaos in pastel branding, stamped it “generative AI,” and declared it progress.Generative Pages whisper, “Don’t worry, the agent will handle it.” It won’t. The agent writes convincing React, not sustainable architecture. Every tweak creates divergence from the low‑code core—the same core that once safeguarded you from dependency hell, npm drift, and patch roulette.You think you got a shortcut. What you actually got was responsibility.Section 1: The Promise and the PivotOfficially, Microsoft calls this a bridge—a seamless link between low‑code convenience and pro‑code flexibility. In theory, GPT‑5 inside Power Apps is the final layer of the stack that lets business users dream in sentences instead of scripting languages. Type “Build a page that lists internal users with filters,” and a capable AI architect assembles the page automatically. Files materialize, components wire themselves up, and the illusion of mastery begins.But here’s where the bridge analogy collapses. This isn’t a bridge; it’s an autopilot that starts rewiring the airplane mid‑flight. You may believe you’re cruising comfortably between low‑code and custom dev. In fact, the AI quietly tears down the cockpit controls and sells you a soldering iron.The intent is noble. Microsoft’s ecosystem has always danced between citizen makers and professional devs. The company wants both populations to coexist, sharing Dataverse tables and governance policies. Generative AI, they argue, finally levels that divide—because now anyone can issue natural‑language commands and get production‑ready code.Except “production‑ready” implies someone, somewhere, will maintain it. And that’s the catch. Low‑code worked because it was declarative—rules, configurations, and formulas that Microsoft’s engine could interpret, validate, and patch safely. Type a formula wrong, and you got a friendly error toast. Edit React? You get lint errors, broken imports, and a vacation into Stack Overflow threads last updated in 2019.This is the moment the promise pivots. The interface still looks like Power Apps, but the guts have left the building. Once that “Edit Code” button is pressed, your app is no longer a managed configuration—it’s source code. The platform stops enforcing its clean boundaries. Identity, data access, control logic, styling—all become mutable text. Text you now have to secure, diff, and patch yourself.Think of Power Apps as a managed city. Roads are paved, lights synchronized, sanitation handled nightly. Everyone builds within zoning laws, so nothing collapses. Now picture Generative Pages granting zoning exemptions. Suddenly, backyard skyscrapers sprout beside single‑story homes, power cables cross sidewalks, and no one’s sure who maintains the plumbing. It’s freedom, yes—but freedom that invites entropy.The cognitive dissonance is spectacular. Marketing says “anyone can build.” Reality says “anyone can break—and few can fix.” This gap between illusion and responsibility is where technical debt breeds. Users who thought they’d delegate complexity to AI discover they’ve merely delayed it to next quarter’s outage.Let’s dwell on that “anyone can maintain” myth. A low‑code page describes what to show; a React component prescribes how to show it. That “how” carries dependencies, state management, async behavior, data calls—each potential point of failure. A citizen dev might know Dataverse schemas but not the difference between a promise chain and an async await. GPT‑5 can generate them both, but it won’t explain why one leaks memory under load.Developers see this and laugh, convinced the feature finally elevates them. “Now we can extend Power Apps freely,” they cheer, forgetting that freedom without guardrails produces the same technical debt they already drown in every sprint. Ironically, Microsoft’s attempt to merge low‑code safety with pro‑code control just hands every participant the other camp’s problems.And that tiny “Edit” button? That’s where everything unravels.Section 2: The Break — Why Pro‑Code Is a DebtThe moment you click “Edit Code,” Power Apps stops being your babysitter. That comforting declarative shield—the one that prevented you from doing anything catastrophic—is gone. You now inhabit pure React land, where one misplaced bracket can unravel an entire interface. Beneath the aesthetic continuity, the architecture has switched species. Declarative became imperative, governed became freelance, predictable became “good luck.”Technically, what happens is simple but devastating. A generative page starts as metadata—Microsoft’s engine compiles it into components that follow the Power Apps runtime. Once you open the code panel, the system snapshots that page’s generated React, wraps it in a thin integration layer, and tells the platform, “This file is externally managed.” Translation: Microsoft stops maintaining it. The safety net doesn’t tear; it’s intentionally removed.From here on, the dependencies, libraries, and JSX logic are yours to shepherd. Security updates? Your problem. Dependency mismatches? Also yours. When Dataverse modifies an endpoint signature, your ungoverned code doesn’t refactor itself. It just breaks quietly at 3 a.m. on a Sunday—right after you told leadership the app was “self‑maintaining.”In the original low‑code world, the Power Apps compiler interpreted formulas. It safeguarded them with type validation, permissions, and centralized patching. You couldn’t import a vulnerable library because everything lived inside Microsoft’s fenced ecosystem. React editing dismantles that fence. Want Material UI? Fine. It’ll import straight from npm. Want to inject a date library, chart component, or custom avatar renderer? Go ahead. Each new dependency is a potential malware injection vector with the full privileges of your data connection.Essentially, the Power Platform was a carefully managed city grid. Every building—page, flow, table—built under strict architectural codes. Sewers connect, traffic lights synchronize, and every upgrade rolls out citywide. Hitting “Edit Code” converts your plot of land into an unlicensed construction site. You can now extend, patch, or repaint your property freely—but when the sewage backs up through your basement, City Hall won’t help.Let’s visualize the debt that bloats quietly after that. First comes the React version drift. Power Apps might upgrade its rendering engine to a new React release. Your component still targets the old one. Hooks deprecate, lifecycle methods change, and suddenly “it worked yesterday” becomes your daily lament. Then come npm dependencies: each with its own patch cycle, security advisories, and breaking‑change schedule. Unless you’re actively reading CVE reports—a pastime no business analyst requested—you’re walking blindfolded through a minefield of vulnerabilities.Consider Dataverse schema evolution. Someone in IT renames a column or alters a relationship. In classic low‑code mode, the runtime adjusts automatically; the next publish rebinds controls to the updated schema. But your custom React page doesn’t know about those updates. It still queries the old field name, fails silently, and serves empty grids while end users file help‑desk tickets.Then there’s authentication drift. Managed Power Apps enforce Microsoft Entra permissions automatically. Custom React components live outside that enforcement boundary. Forget a permission check, and your page might happily render sensitive user data to anyone with the link. You didn’t merely break functionality—you violated compliance.Yet the makers remain blissfully convinced the AI will patch things later. “Oh, I’ll just tell the agent to fix it,” they say, as though GPT were a dependable colleague instead of a stochastic parrot with attention issues. Generative AI can rewrite broken code, yes. It cannot understand why it broke. Each regeneration piles abstraction upon abstraction until your app resembles a tower built by well‑intentioned interns on Red Bull—impressive from afar, unstable up close.Here’s the quiet irony: professional developers already fight this debt in traditional projects. They use CI/CD pipelines, linters, dependency scanners, and version locks to contain it. Citizen developers—those new recruits in productivity—rarely have such discipline. When granted full React powers, they create the same debt patterns but without the guardrails. And when the inevitable failure arrives, IT inherits the mess, discovering code written half by humans, half by AI, and wholl
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-modern-work-security-and-productivity-with-microsoft-365--6704921/support.
Follow us on:
LInkedIn
Substack
