Ever wonder why Outlook still feels slower than it should, or why Word insists on making you repeat the same edits over and over? Most of us just work around those frustrations. But now imagine Copilot actually anticipating your intent before you even finish typing. GPT-5 isn’t just faster—it changes what Copilot understands about your workflow. Stay with me, because in the next few minutes we’re going to unpack exactly where that leap starts to make your day smoother, and what problems it quietly eliminates that you’ve probably stopped noticing yourself.Why Our Daily M365 Tools Still Feel Slower Than UsImagine waiting longer for Outlook to load than it takes to actually write the reply. That tiny delay doesn’t just cost you seconds—it breaks your rhythm. You’re ready to respond, your thought is clear, and suddenly you’re staring at a spinning icon instead of getting the job done. We’ve all been in that spot, and it’s easy to shrug and move on. But when you add these interruptions across a day, it’s more than an inconvenience. It’s a pattern of friction that slows everything down, even when the actual work you’re doing is simple. Outlook, Word, Excel—all of them have habits like this that we’ve just learned to tolerate. Think about how often you’ve searched for an email thread only to find yourself manually scrolling anyway because the filters take too long or don’t sort quite right. Or the number of times you’ve copied a block of text in Word only to fix the formatting for the tenth time that week. In Excel, it’s the endless adjustments of column widths, tweaking formulas that should have been reusable, or fighting to keep charts consistent with the new data you pasted in. None of these are “hard” tasks. They’re repetitive in a way that feels like you’ve become the low-level assistant to the software, not the other way around. The strangest part is how normal it feels at this point. If you step back, it almost doesn’t make sense. Microsoft rolls out updates constantly. We’ve all installed patches, seen the ribbon interfaces evolve, and noticed the little AI “help” icons creeping into the toolbar. But the experience of actually using the tools hasn’t shaken off those daily bumps. There’s a quiet resignation in the way people approach it: Outlook is just slow, Word will always need formatting cleanup, Excel will always require nudging. We plan for it in the same way we plan for traffic during a commute. I know someone who manages quarterly reporting for their team. Each time, they copy in the same data, update the same formulas, and then spend half a day reformatting charts and cleaning up the report’s design so that it looks presentable for management. The automation tools are technically there—macros, some quick AI assist—but they underestimate what people actually need. Instead of anticipating style preferences, phrasing, or layout decisions, the tools just repeat mechanical actions. The result is a ritual of doing the same extra work, quarter after quarter, with only partial relief. Outlook has its own flavor of inefficiency. Sorting rules work, but they’re rigid. You still wade through noise before landing on the emails that matter. Yes, it can surface important messages, but the blunt categories leave you second-guessing whether something has slipped through. In Word, predictive suggestions often fall flat. You may type “per our” and it wants to auto-complete into something overly formal—or worse, irrelevant—missing the way you actually communicate. The AI tries, but it doesn’t really understand repetition that comes with nuance. To be fair, Copilot with GPT-4 brought real improvements. Drafts get generated in seconds, and you can ask for summaries or formula suggestions that would have saved massive effort a few years ago. But here’s the catch: it still feels transactional. The tool does what you say, but it doesn’t quite grasp what you mean. Copilot interprets commands, but it doesn’t yet understand the context that shapes why you’re doing the task or what outcome would save you the next three steps. That gap is where friction survives. Our expectations are higher. We all want smart tools that cut the boring work automatically, not smart-ish tools that require additional babysitting. When Copilot produces a draft that needs heavy rewriting, or a summary that strips out the detail you actually needed, you don’t save time. You just trade manual typing for manual fixing. The promise of seamless assistance is there, but it’s still not fully realized. That brings us to GPT-5. Instead of bolts of intelligence added onto inefficient systems, you start to see software that moves closer to how you think and work. GPT-5 doesn’t just respond when spoken to—it starts to preempt the actions you always repeat. Whether it’s grasping the tone of your writing without prompting or recognizing the structure of your spreadsheet before you explain it, the shift is subtle but noticeable. These once-accepted annoyances stop background humming in your day and quietly fade out of your workflow. If Word and Outlook have always felt one step behind you, next we’ll see how GPT-5 flips the script by moving from instructions to something that feels much closer to genuine understanding.The Leap from Instructions to True UnderstandingCopilot right now often feels like handing a to-do list to a new intern—you have to spell out every step in plain detail. Type this exactly, fix that formatting, summarize this thread. And even after all that, you still expect they’ll miss the tone you wanted or drop the detail that actually matters. It isn’t bad work, but you don’t feel like you’re collaborating with a capable partner. You’re still managing the tool instead of trusting it to manage the job. That’s because today’s Copilot operates mostly on instructions rather than understanding. It parses the words you type, but it doesn’t fully grasp the intent behind them. This difference between instructing software and working alongside it is subtle but important. Think of it this way: instructing is what happens when you say, “Make a chart with these numbers.” Collaborating is when the system recognizes the messy dataset, understands what you’ve been working toward over the last few minutes, and proactively says, “Here’s a chart that aligns with your goal—do you want it grouped by region or by time period?” We’re not talking about magic insights. We’re talking about something as basic as the system keeping track of the context you’ve already provided instead of starting fresh every time. Where this breaks down today is in moments when Copilot delivers something that technically follows your instruction but ignores the context around it. Maybe you’ve typed a professional but warm email draft fifty times before. You ask Copilot for help, and it spits out sterile corporate phrasing that sounds like a standardized template. Or you’re in Excel, and you need a formula to track average sales by salesperson for the quarter. Copilot might suggest SUM instead of AVERAGE, or give you something valid but irrelevant. Then you end up trying variation after variation of the same prompt until the output lines up with what you need. Each rerun chips away at the supposed time savings. And it isn’t just Excel or email. In Word, users often repeat themselves in a slightly different way just to nudge Copilot into getting the draft closer to their real tone. Instead of “summarize this report,” it becomes “summarize this report for senior leadership with emphasis on team performance and without repeating background details.” Then you try again with “make it shorter,” or “shift the tone to encouraging, not neutral.” Taken individually those steps don’t look terrible. In practice, though, you often end up writing just as much as you would’ve by hand, except now you’re writing instructions instead of sentences. GPT-5 changes the nature of those interactions. The leap isn’t about adding more features or more pre-written templates. It’s about threading reasoning through the task so the system understands the why along with the what. GPT-5 builds a memory of tone, audience, and purpose across the different files and apps you’re touching. This acts as glue. Instead of resetting with every new command, it keeps track of the bigger picture. Picture drafting a report in Word. With previous Copilot versions, you’d write a chunk of text, ask for a summary, fix the tone, then maybe cut it down again. With GPT-5, the system recognizes your usual phrasing, mirrors your ways of emphasizing key points, and produces a summary that already sounds like your work. The difference is immediate. Instead of multiple prompts, you’re looking at a usable draft on the first attempt. Or take Excel. You paste in a dataset with hundreds of rows. You ask for analysis. Instead of spitting out raw formulas or awkward charts unrelated to your decision point, GPT-5 now interprets the dataset. It sorts dates naturally, recognizes which column is the identifier, and understands you want overall trends, not just arithmetic. The formula it suggests isn’t generic—it’s tailored to the shape and meaning of the data. Maybe it highlights anomalies or points out correlations before you even asked. That type of anticipation is where repeated prompting drops away. The result for the user is far less back-and-forth. Output quality shifts from “usable after editing” to “usable right away.” When the system nails tone, structure, and calculation on the first attempt, you stop thinking about how to phrase prompts. You focus back on the actual work outcome. That’s the real leap from instruction to understanding. And it sets the stage for the next big question: usually, when something gets smarter, it also gets slower. But with GPT-5 in Copilot, the surprise is that it manages to be both sharper and faster at the same time.Speed You Can Actually Feel in Daily WorkflowsNothing kills your flow like asking Copilot for a draft wh
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.
