Picture your data as a swarm of goblins: messy, multiplying in the dark, and definitely not helping you win over users. Drop Copilot into that chaos and you don’t get magic productivity—you get it spitting out outdated contract summaries and random nonsense your boss thinks came from 2017. Not exactly confidence-inspiring. Here’s the fix: tame those goblins with the right prep and rollout, and Copilot finally acts like the assistant people actually want. I’ll give you the Top 10 actions to make Copilot useful, not theory—stuff you can run this week. Quick plug: grab the free checklist at m365.show so you don’t miss a step. Because the real nightmare isn’t day two of Copilot. It’s when your rollout fails before anyone even touches it.Why Deployments Fail Before Day OneToo many Copilot rollouts sputter out before users ever give it a fair shot. And it’s rarely because Microsoft slipped some bad code into your tenant or you missed a magic license toggle. The real problem is expectation—people walk in thinking Copilot is a switch you flip and suddenly thirty versions of a budget file merge into one perfect answer. That’s the dream. Reality is more like trying to fuel an Olympic runner with cheeseburgers: instead of medals, you just get cramps and regret. The issue comes down to data. Copilot doesn’t invent knowledge; it chews on whatever records you feed it. If your tenant is a mess of untagged files, duplicate spreadsheets, and abandoned SharePoint folders, you’ve basically laid out a dumpster buffet. One company I worked with thought their contract library was “clean.” In practice, some contracts were expired, others mislabeled, and half were just old drafts stuck in “final” folders. The result? Copilot spat out a summary confidently claiming a partnership from 2019 was still active. Legal freaked out. Leadership panicked. And trust in Copilot nosedived almost instantly. That kind of fiasco isn’t on the AI—it’s on the inputs. Copilot did exactly what it was told: turn garbage into polished garbage. The dangerous part is how convincing the output looks. Users hear the fluent summary and trust it, right up until they find a glaring contradiction. By then, the tool carries a new label: unreliable. And once that sticker’s applied, it’s hard to peel off. Experience and practitioner chatter all point to the same root problem: poor data governance kills AI projects before they even start. You can pay for licenses, bring in consultants, and run glossy kickoff meetings. None of it matters if the system underneath is mud. And here’s the kicker—users don’t care about roadmap PowerPoints or governance frameworks. If their very first Copilot query comes back wrong, they close the window and move on. From their perspective, the pitch is simple: “Here’s this fancy new assistant. Ask it anything.” So they try something basic like, “Show me open contracts with supplier X.” Copilot obliges—with outdated deals, missing clauses, and expired terms all mixed in. Ask yourself—would they click a second time after that? Probably not. As soon as the office rumor mill brands it “just another gimmick,” adoption flatlines. So what’s the fix? Start small. Take that first anecdote: the messy contract library. If it sounds familiar, don’t set out to clean your entire estate. Instead, triage. Pick one folder you can fix in two days. Get labels consistent, dates current, drafts removed. Then connect Copilot to that small slice and run the same test. The difference is immediate—and more importantly, it rebuilds user confidence. Think of it like pest control. Every missing metadata field, every duplicate spreadsheet, every “Final_V7_REALLY.xlsx” is another goblin running loose in the basement. Leadership may be upstairs celebrating their shiny AI pilot, but downstairs those goblins are chewing wires and rearranging folders. Let Copilot loose down there, and you’ve just handed them megaphones. The takeaway is simple: bad data doesn’t blow up your deployment in one dramatic crash. It just sandpapers every interaction until user trust wears down completely. One bad answer becomes two. Then the whispers start: “It’s not accurate.” Soon nobody bothers to try it at all. So the hidden first step isn’t licensing or training—it’s hunting the goblins. Scrub a small set of records. Enforce some structure. Prove the tool works with clean inputs before scaling out. Skip that, and yes—your rollout fails before Day One. But there’s another side to this problem worth calling out. Even if the data is ready, users won’t lean in unless they actually *want* to. Which raises the harder question: why would someone ask for Copilot at all, instead of just ignoring it?How Organizations Got People to *Want* CopilotWhat flipped the script for some organizations was simple: they got people to *want* Copilot, not just tolerate it. And that’s rare in IT land. Normally, when we push out a new tool, it sits in the toolbar like an unwanted app nobody asked for. But when users see immediate value—actual time back in their day—they stop ignoring it and start asking managers why their department doesn’t have it yet.Here’s the key difference: tolerated tools just live on the desktop collecting dust, opened only when the boss says, “use it.” Demanded tools show up in hallway chatter—“Hey, this just saved me an hour.” That shift comes from visible wins. Not theory—practical things people can measure. For example: cutting monthly report prep from eight hours to two, automating status updates so approvals close a full day faster, or reducing those reconciliation errors that make finance teams want to chuck laptops out the window. Those are the kind of wins that turn curiosity into real appetite.Too many IT rollouts assume adoption works by decree. Licensing gets assigned, the comms team sends a cheerful Monday email, and someone hopes excitement spreads. It doesn’t. Users don’t care about strategy decks; they care if their Friday night is saved because they didn’t have to chase through thirty spreadsheets. Miss that, and Copilot gets ghosted before it has a chance.The opposite shows up in real deployments that created demand. I saw a finance firm run a small, focused Copilot pilot in one department. A handful of analysts went from drowning in Excel tabs to handing off half that grunt work to Copilot. Reports went out cleaner. Backlogs shrank. And the best part—word leaked beyond the pilot group. Staff in other departments started pressing managers with, “Why do they get this and we don’t?” Suddenly IT wasn’t pushing adoption—it was refereeing a line at the door. And if you want the playbook, here’s how they did it: six analysts, a three-week pilot, live spreadsheets, and a daily feedback loop. Tight scope, rapid iteration, visible gains.That’s the cafeteria effect: nobody cares about lukewarm mystery meat, but bring in a taco bar and suddenly there’s a line. And it sticks—because demand is driven by proof of value, not by another corporate comms blast. Want the pilot checklist to start your own “taco bar”? Grab it at m365.show.Here’s what the smart teams leaned on. First, they used champions inside the business—not IT staff—to show real stories like “this saved me an hour this morning.” Second, they picked wins others could see: reports delivered early, approvals unclogged, prep time cut in half. Third, they let the proof spread socially. Word of mouth across Teams chats and roundtables hit harder than any glossy announcement ever could. It wasn’t about marketing—it was about letting peer proof build credibility.That’s why people began asking for Copilot. Because suddenly it wasn’t one more login screen—it was the thing saving them from another tedious data grind. Organizations that made those wins visible flipped the whole posture. Instead of IT nagging people to “adopt,” users were pulling Copilot into their daily flow like oxygen. That’s adoption with teeth—momentum you don’t have to manufacture. Of course, showing the wins is one thing; structuring the rollout so it doesn’t feel like a sales pitch is another. And that’s where the right frameworks came into play.The Frameworks That Didn’t Sound Like Sales PitchesYou ever sat through change management slides and thought, “Wow, this feels like an MBA group project”? Same here. AI rollouts should be simple: show users what the tool does, prep them to try it, and back them up when they get stuck. Instead, we get decks with a hundred arrows, concentric circles, and more buzzwords than a product rename week at Microsoft. That noise might impress a VP, but it doesn’t help the people actually grinding through spreadsheets. The ones that work are frameworks stripped down, pointed at real pain points, and built short enough that employees don’t tune out.ADKAR was one of the few that translated cleanly into practice. On paper it’s Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement. In Copilot world, here’s what that means: Awareness comes from targeted demos that actually show what Copilot can do for their role—not a glossy video about the “future of productivity.” Desire means proving payoff right away, like showing them how a task they hate takes half the time. Knowledge has to be microlearning, not death-by-deck. Give them five-minute checklists, cheat sheets, or tooltips. Ability comes from sandboxing, letting users practice with fake data or non-critical work so they don’t feel like one wrong click could tank a project. Reinforcement isn’t another corporate memo—it’s templates, shortcuts, or a manager giving recognition when someone pulls it off. Stripped of its acronym armor, ADKAR isn’t theory at all. It’s a roadmap that says: tell them what it is, why it improves their day, how to use it, let them practice without fear, then keep rewarding its use. The checkpoint here is simple: before you roll out, make sure you can point to at least two real tasks where Copilot improves results by a clear percentage. You set the number—10
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-modern-work-security-and-productivity-with-microsoft-365--6704921/support.
Follow us on:
LInkedIn
Substack
