Ever wondered why your Viva deployment feels half-finished, despite all the hype? Most organizations barely scratch the surface of what Viva APIs can actually do. Today, we're going deep—I'll show you how to automate your own custom learning modules, auto-publish organization-wide news, and weave your company knowledge straight into Viva Topics using real API calls.If you're tired of manual data entry and want to make Viva work for your business—not the other way around—you’re in the right place.Breaking the Authentication Barrier: Real-World API Access Without HeadachesIf you’ve ever tried to connect to a Viva API and hit that brick wall of an authentication failure, you’re not alone. Most folks start out with the docs right in front of them, thinking it’s going to be a quick afternoon project. You plug in your client ID, pop a request over to Azure AD for a token, try to call the endpoint, and—boom—“Unauthorized.” Not a helpful ‘try this’ message. Just that cold, dead stop that leaves you tracing your code one line at a time. I’ve seen experienced M365 engineers, people who live and breathe Graph, get stuck here and start questioning if they’ve misunderstood basic OAuth. There’s that temptation to blame yourself, or the docs, or the universe, but the truth is, Viva’s API story is just trickier than a lot of the standard Microsoft stuff.Even with the official documentation, you can follow every step and still find yourself adrift. One moment you’re thinking, “This should be the same as calling Microsoft Graph,” and the next you’re sifting through thirty tabs on delegated permissions, application scopes, admin consent, and secret registration. What makes it even messier is the split between Graph and native Viva endpoints. Some endpoints live under the wider Graph umbrella, but others—especially the ones for deeper automation of Topics or Learning—require their own specific permissions and scopes. You might get a token that works perfectly for /me or /users or SharePoint content, then hit a wall when sending that same token to a Viva endpoint. And the error messages sometimes read like they were output by a machine learning model on its first day—just cryptic enough to be unhelpful, but not weird enough to give you something to Google.Let’s talk permissions, because this is where most roadblocks pop up. There’s that classic Azure portal screen, littered with toggles for Delegated and Application Permissions. It’s not enough to pick one at random. If you go with Delegated, your requests will only work in the context of whoever’s signed in—which is fine for testing, not great for scheduled automations. Application permissions are what most orgs want for real automation, but getting them approved can take days or weeks if your security team is strict. There’s usually at least one back-and-forth, some tense emails about ‘why do you need this,’ and—if Conditional Access is in play—an extra check that mysteriously blocks access at runtime without a clear error. I’ve seen orgs burn a full sprint just trying to land one permission in the right place, all while the project manager asks for status updates.Too often, it comes down to one missing permission that someone assumed got granted. A classic case: a mid-sized company tried to orchestrate custom Topic publishing. Everything looked stamped ‘success’ in the portal. Service principal was set up, secret configured, scopes listed as granted, but every single automation job failed. After hours of log-chasing, it turned out one obscure “Viva Topics.Manage” permission was missing from the app registration. No warning, just silent failure. The fix was simple once they found it—add the permission, re-consent, restart the workflow. But they’d lost an entire week to a box left unchecked.The technical side isn’t just about picking the right permissions, though. There are real choices about how you authenticate the app itself. A year ago, everyone was using client secrets. Fast, simple, but a little weak on security. More orgs moved to certificates—they’re more secure and easier to rotate, but also more prone to subtle failures if you don’t manage the certificate stores or key vaults carefully. Recently, there’s been a shift away from allowing client secrets altogether, especially with Microsoft tightening default tenant security. Some tenants block older auth flows outright. If you’re scripting in PowerShell or writing a quick C# connector, you’ll need to pay close attention to exactly which secret or certificate your app expects. Miss a step, and you’ll either get a warning about not finding the right credential, or worse, another generic “Unauthorized” message.When you’re actually laying down code, even a working sample might trip you up the first time. Picture a C# console app with MSAL built in. You authenticate, fetch the token, call the endpoint—and you get a 403 forbidden. Dig into the network trace, and you’ll spot the scope line: maybe it’s missing the exact “https://yourtenant.viva.microsoft.com/.default” permission, or you’re using a Graph token for something that needs the native endpoint. It only takes one mismatch to trigger a silent error.The best way forward is always to ask for the least possible privilege. It’s tempting to just tick every box and ask for global admin consent, but your security team will call foul, and honestly—it’s unnecessary risk. Focus on the specific scopes your workflow actually needs. If you’re just writing Topics, don’t ask for user profile access. Go minimal. That’s the approach that stands up in a proper security review, and it’s more likely to avoid breakage six months from now after a global policy change.If you’ve been locked out before, chances are it wasn’t your code. It was a missing app registration, a half-approved permission, or a certificate upload that expired last week and no one noticed. Start with a checklist: target the right endpoint, use the minimal required scope, confirm consent has actually landed, and if you use certificates, set renewals and automate the check. That’s the real bulletproof flow—nothing fancy, but it survives a security audit and keeps your automation running even when tenant settings shift underneath you.Once you’ve broken through that authentication wall, everything opens up. With solid access, you’re finally able to automate—and the first place to see real impact is automating Viva Topics. This is where the manual drudgery finally starts to disappear.Custom Knowledge, No Manual Entry: Automating Viva Topics at ScaleIf you’ve spent any time poking through a freshly turned-on Viva Topics Center, you already know the punchline. Most of the time, you’ll find a handful of automatically-generated pages and then a lot of blank spaces. The search bar turns up quirky projects, acronyms no one remembers, and about half a page of boilerplate. Everything else? Empty or out of date. It’s not that your company lacks knowledge worth sharing—it’s that nobody’s got the time or patience to stay on top of it. The typical knowledge manager holds out for a month or two, gamely filling in cards and nudging coworkers to pitch in, but eventually, manual curation stalls out. Even with the best intentions, this is grunt work. No one lines up to type out project overviews or track down expertise every time a new team spins up.So why don’t more organizations just automate the bulk of it? You can technically create Topics by calling the API, but here’s where reality asserts itself. The docs are thin, especially when it comes to real examples, and error messages range from vague to downright misleading. You’ll send a beautifully structured POST request, see a “201 Created” in the response, and pat yourself on the back—until you check the Topics Center and your new topic is nowhere to be found. If you try to trace what vanished, you’ll get little help from the logs. Most folks lose hours to this stage, convinced the API simply doesn’t work as promised.Here’s what’s actually going on. Viva Topics is strict about required fields, and even stricter about metadata. Most of the time, invisible topics happen because a single field is missing, or a property is in the wrong publishing state. You’ve got to hit the right balance between mandatory and optional details. If you skip type or context cues, or leave out alternate names, that’s a recipe for “create but not display.” And if you don’t explicitly set the publishing status—think draft versus published—it’s going to stay hidden. The API will happily take your data, but the system quietly shelves it, waiting for an admin, or a workflow, to hit Publish. Until then, you’ve filled the database, but your knowledge doesn’t surface.It’s a big difference when you see it done right. Think about a manufacturing company that was tired of generic, half-filled topic pages. Before, their Topic Center was an empty shell, apart from a few scattered topics about HR policies and leadership. Then, they built a bulk upload tool—just a simple service running on Azure Functions—pulling details from their internal SharePoint archives. They mapped core concepts and key projects into the topic schema, piped it into the endpoint, and published at scale. The overnight result? Suddenly, their knowledge center lit up. Project teams didn’t need to guess who’d run an initiative three years ago—every concept page pulled real descriptions, owner lists, and related content, all automated. The transformation was hard to miss, not because of flashy UI, but because people finally found answers when they searched.Let’s quickly break down what actually matters inside the API call. The endpoint for creating a Topic sits inside the Graph universe, but it expects rigorous structure. You need the right JSON payload—title, description, alternative names, and at least one reference. What surprises most folks is that the “state” property needs to be set to “published.” Leave it as “draft” or skip it, and no end user will ev
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.
