Shows
MCMP – LogicCaie's Paradox of CredenceHartry Field (NYU) gives a talk at the MCMP Colloquium (21 May, 2015) titled "Caie's Paradox of Credence". Abstract: Call a sentence ‘contradictory’ if it together with acceptable assumptions entails absurdities, and ‘paradoxical’ if it and its negation are both contradictory in this sense. There are plausible examples of paradoxical sentences: e.g. Liar sentences that assert their own untruth. What should our credence be in paradoxical sentences? There is a seemingly compelling argument that it should be interval-valued: in the case of non-empirically paradoxical sentences, our credence should be the full unit interval [0,1]. But Michael Caie has raised the issue of how to h...2015-07-2400 minMCMP – LogicIndicative Conditionals, Restricted Quantification, Naïve TruthHartry Field (NYU) gives a talk at the MCMP Colloquium (20 May, 2015) titled "Indicative Conditionals, Restricted Quantification, Naïve Truth". Abstract: Truth is "naive" if for eternal sentences S, the attribution of truth to S is equivalent to S. Kripke’s theory of truth (the Kleene based version) shows how to get naive truth for very simple languages. After some motivation, I will sketch how to extend a broadly Kripkean approach to a language with a variably strict conditional operator, of the kind that Stalnaker and others have used to represent ordinary indicative conditionals of English. Also, to show how to com...2015-06-0300 min