Shows
Begin The Breakthrough Full Audiobook Now, Story Seekers!The Sword in Japanese Martial Traditions, Vol. 2 by Nicklaus Suino, Matthew Galas, Richard Babin, Joseph Svinth, Andrew Bryant, Deborah Klens-Bigman, Kimberly TaylorPlease visithttps://thebookvoice.com/podcasts/2/audible/60450to listen full audiobooks.
Title: The Sword in Japanese Martial Traditions, Vol. 2
Author: Nicklaus Suino, Matthew Galas, Richard Babin, Joseph Svinth, Andrew Bryant, Deborah Klens-Bigman, Kimberly Taylor
Narrator: Virtual Voice
Format: mp3
Length: 2 hrs and 29 mins
Release date: 04-17-25
Ratings: Not rated yet
Genres: Combat Sports & Self-Defense
Publisher's Summary:2025-04-172h 29
The Mike Church ShowThe Mike Church Show #2070-The Battle To End Birthright Citizenship Is On
SEGMENT 1
Time 6:06am cst
WE ARE LIVE on 990 WGSO, Our Flagship Syndication Station in New Orleans Louisiana all week from 7am-10am!
Welcome to the Mike Church Show on www.crusadechannel.com Call the show 844-5CRUSADE
Did you miss yesterday’s LIVE Mike Church Show? Worry not, you can listen to all previously aired shows on CRUSADEchannel.com
19m
Birthright Citizenship
Government by Judiciary
There was a bill introduced by a Congressman from Texas that is the Birthright Citizenship Act.
He actually said exactly what I told you guys yesterday.
He mentioned the freed slaves just as...2025-01-2305 min
The Auto Tech ShowTalking National Tire Safety Week 2024Last year's show: https://youtu.be/FVz1qwp0v4YMore from UTSMA: https://www.ustires.org/More from TIA: https://www.tireindustry.org/More from Discount Tire: https://www.discounttire.com/Today is a big show. Not only in terms of the topic we will discussing, which is of course road safety thanks to the US Tire Manufacture Associations annual campaign, National Tire Safety Week, but also because of the panel of guests we have rounded up for you today. On that note, lets introduce today’s panel of guests and get...2024-06-1751 min
Art Law Case Briefs PodcastUnited States v. McClain, (1977)The defendants in this case had covertly aided in locating buyers for the cultural property, knowing they were likely violating Mexico’s patrimony laws.2022-04-1802 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastGeorgia O’Keeffe Foundation (Museum) v. Fisk University (2009)Alfred Stieglitz, a innovative photographer, collector of modern art, and husband of Georgia O'Keeffe, perished leaving behind an estate included approximately 900 works of art and a will and testament that stated Georgia O'Keeffe, and this appeal examined respective rights of three parties concerning charitable gifts of 101 pieces of art given, subject to conditions, to Fisk University in the late 1940s and early 1950s2022-04-1805 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastNational Endowment for the Arts v. Finley (1998)1990’s funding decisions of the NEA were under fire when the art viewing public found the funding and works scandalous, and congress responded with amendment section 954 of the National Foundation on Arts and Humanities Act2022-04-1302 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastCincinnati v. Contemporary Arts Center (1990)Robert Mapplethorpe Exhibition “Perfect Moment” featured 5 graphic photos amongst 169 non-obscene works in Cincinnati v. Contemporary Arts Center, addressing the "as a whole" phrase in the Miller Test.2022-04-1303 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastMiller v. California (1973)Here the 3-pronged Miller Test is established in response to an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court involving Marvin Miller's unsolicited, sexually explicit, obscene, mailing advertisements for sexy books.2022-04-1303 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastRoth v. United States(1957)Both a California and a New York bookseller had been charged with Obscenity for distributing books and magazines featuring nude photos and erotic stories, with their appeals heard before the United States Supreme Court.2022-04-1303 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastCarter v. Helmsley-Spear, IncThree sculptures were found to be employees creating a work for hire resulting in the loss of their work and VARA rights.2022-04-1105 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastGilliam v. Am. Broad. Companies, Inc ( 1976)How Monty Python helped pave the way for some recognition of moral rights in the U.S. courts.2022-04-1104 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastVargas v. Esquire, Inc., 164 F.2d 522 (7th Cir. 1947)This case looks at an artist's renderings for Esquire Magazine and how the U.S. differs from France in recognizing attribution and paternity.2022-04-1001 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastNational Historic Shrines Foundation, Inc. v. Dali (1967)This 1967 case looks at the validity of an oral contract made with Dali to complete a publicity stunt by painting a picture live on television and addresses how the United States approaches artists obligations.2022-04-1002 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastCampbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc (1994).2 Live Crew's parody of Roy Orbison's "Oh, Pretty Woman" reaches the Supreme Court in a debate over copyright and fair use.2022-04-0305 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastCommunity for Creative Non-Violence (CCNV) v. Reid Art Law Case Brief (1989)Debate over copyright to James Earl Reid's powerful sculpture and its journey to the Supreme Court, which ruled in Reid’s favor, setting an important precedent in favor of the rights of freelance artists to retain their creative and intellectual property.2022-04-0308 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastSatava v. Lowry (2003) Art Law Case BriefThis case looks at the works of two glass artists, one from California, and one from Hawaii, both who created jelly fish in a glass-in-glass medium and if the elements of the work were protected under copyright and if so, if they were infringed upon.2022-04-0106 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastBurrow-Giles Lithograpgh Co. v. Sarony (1884) Art Law Case Brief2022-03-3106 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastUnited States v. Perry Art Law Case Brief (1892)This 1892 case involves the importation of stained-glass windows and the legal question on if the classify as art and taxed in accordance.2022-03-2604 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastMayers, Osterwald & Muhlfeld, Inc. v. BendlerThis 1931 Art Law Case asks if the import of the Nassak diamond was correctly classified as an artistic antiquity or if it was simply a diamond with a romantic history.2022-03-2605 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastConsmiller v. United States Case Brief 1912This 1912 case involves tariffs on imported marble to the United States and if the marble mantles could be considered art or sculpture resulting in a lower tariff under the Tariff Act of 1909.2022-03-2604 minArt Law Case Briefs PodcastUnited States v. Olivotti & Co Case Brief2022-03-2409 min