Bjorn Brembs - Podcast Details

Shows

Wissenschaft auf die Ohren Der Elsevier-DEAL-Vertrag (Open Science Radio)Im Gespräch mit Björn Brembs diskutiert Konrad Förstner den Elsevier-DEAL-Vertrag. Es werden Hintergrundinformation zu einem dazu gemeinsam verfassten Artikel in der FAZ dazu gegeben. Quelle: https://www.openscienceradio.org/2024/01/07/osr210-der-elsevier-deal-vertrag-de/ / Bitte abonniert den Original-Podcastfeed: https://openscienceradio.org/feed/mp4/

2024-01-0833 min

Open Science Radio OSR210 Der Elsevier-DEAL-Vertrag [DE] Im Gespräch mit Björn Brembs diskutiert Konrad Förstner den Elsevier-DEAL-Vertrag. Es werden Hintergrundinformation zu einem dazu gemeinsam verfassten Artikel in der FAZ dazu gegeben. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License Teilnehmer Konrad Förstner Twitter Website GitHub ORCiD ResearchGate Björn Brembs Website Twitter Website ORCiD ResearchGate GitHub Shownotes: OSR210 Der Elsevier-DEAL-Vertrag [DE] Begrüßung und Artikel-Einführung — Björn Brembs; — FAZ-Artikel "Kein guter Deal"; — FAZ; — Ulrich_Dirnagl; — Claudia_Müller-Birn; — Vorgeschichte und generelles Klima zu den Open-Access-Transformationsverträgen — The DEAL Consortium and Elsevier Ann...

2024-01-0733 min

Labor ins Ohr The Open Access Movement Bernd Christoph Björn Brembs Twitter ‘Plan S’ and ‘cOAlition S’ – Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications About DEAL – Projekt DEAL brembs.net: Research on Learning, Memory and Evolution Sci-Hub – Wikipedia

2022-05-3154 min

Vetenskapsradion Piratdrottningen – hon vill öppna tillgången till vetenskapI Indien pågår en rättegång mot Sci-Hub, en databas som erbjuder fri åtkomst till tiotals miljoner vetenskapliga tidskrifter. I USA är FBI ute efter databasens skapare, Alexandra Elbakyan. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. Samtidigt pågår i Sverige och i hela forskarvärlden en diskussion om Open Access, och om hur vi kommer att läsa vetenskapliga artiklar i framtiden. Att få en artikel publicerad i en vetenskaplig tidskrift med hög status, som Nature eller Science, kan lägga grunden för en hel forskarkarriär...

2021-06-1819 min

Carne Esperta #40 'If you're too predictable, you may end up in the mouth of a predator' Prof. Björn Brembs | CE PodcastThe machine journalist "BIS" interviews the Professor of Neurobiology Björn Brembs to learn more about our human intelligence. http://brembs.net/ Subscribe so you don't miss new interviews: #carneesperta #smartmeat https://twitter.com/carneesperta https://www.instagram.com/carneesperta https://www.tiktok.com/@carneesperta fb.me/carneesperta m.me/carneesperta https://www.linkedin.com/company/carneesperta https://open.spotify.com/show/2H7YXepIPLgRGlam0SUkCY https://podcasts.apple.com/pt/podcast/carne-esperta/id1528942902 https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8zMmM1YTk5MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw== https://radiopublic.com/carne-esperta-GOKmQL/episodes https://pca.st/vq2t1...

2021-01-1720 min

Open Science Radio OSR197 Personalisiertes Tracking von WissenschaftlerInnen durch Verlage Der Wandel der großen Wissenschaftsverlage vom Content Provider zum Data Analytics Business wird in den zurückliegenden Jahren verstärkt beobachtet und dokumentiert. Das damit auch ein zunehmend umfangreicheres User Tracking stattfindet wurde erst jüngst durch Offenlegungen belegt – immer mehr Verlagsplattformen werden durch eine Vielzahl von Technologien entsprechend aufgerüstet und sind somit in der Lage das Informationsverhalten der Nutzer (insbesondere Hochschulangehöriger) zu tracken, zu speichern, zu analysieren und zu personalisierten Profilen zu aggregieren. Die Gefahr personalisierter Profile ist auch in diesem Bereich sehr kritisch zu betrachten, insbesondere wenn diese Daten nicht nur bei den Verlagen verbleib...

2020-12-291h 33

The ORION Open Science Podcast 'There is no spoon': Imagining Science Without JournalsEpisode Summary: In this week's episode, Open Science advocate and researcher Björn Brembs talks about his analysis of and radical solutions to the flaws he identifies in the scientific publishing system. Brembs discusses manipulated impact factors, pseudo-competitions, the evolution of the reproducibility crisis, and what we could all do instead! Links: Björn Brembs Blog Björn Brembs Twitter Article on pseudo-competitions in science (in German) Quotes: 'People strive not to find the next interesting discovery, but to find the next paper' 'Our i...

2019-07-0452 min

Science for Progress 21 Altmetrics: A Better Way to Evaluate Research(ers)? – with Steffen LemkeWho gets positions and funding in academia should depend on the merit of the researcher, project, or institute. But how do we assess these merits fairly, meaningfully and in a way that makes it comparable? I talked about metrics with Steffen Lemke, PhD student at the Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (ZBW), in Kiel, Germany. He is part of the *metrics project, which investigates new research metrics and their applicability. The project is funded by the German Researcher Association, DFG. Listen to the Full Conversation on Patreon! Citation Based Metrics In episode 9 I talked with Björn Brembs about the m...

2019-03-0300 min

Science for Progress 20 B&D: 1st Anniversary! Podcasts, and Trusting ScientistsThis episode of Bart and Dennis Talk is actually our first anniversary episode! While Science for Progress was founded in July 2017, the podcast went online on February 20th 2018! Announcement At the beginning of the episode I announce that I will be on the Twitter “rotating curation account” @RecovingAcad, which belongs to the Recovering Academic Podcast. We had a crossover episode with them, last November. I will be tweeting about leaving academia and transitioning into industry from February 25th to March 2nd. On March 3rd I will do a live video AMA on the account @theaddictivebrain on Instagram. Addictive Brain is a sc...

2019-02-2600 min

Science for Societal Progress 12 Q&A Meritocracy in AcademiaThis episode is the first ‘Q&A’ episode, where my new co-host Dr. Bart Geurten (see episode 8) and I talk about what’s new in academia. Our conversations are free form and may lead us astray here and there. We discuss the concept of ‘merit’ in the natural sciences. And we begin with a quick recap on episode 9, where I talked to Dr. Björn Brembs about the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). The JIF is a metric designed to measure the impact a journal had in the scientific community. There are many problems with how JIFs are generated...

2018-10-2836 min

Science for Progress 12 Q&A Meritocracy in AcademiaThis episode is the first 'Q&A' episode, where my new co-host Dr. Bart Geurten (see episode 8) and I talk about what's new in academia. Our conversations are free form and may lead us astray here and there. We discuss the concept of 'merit' in the natural sciences. And we begin with a quick recap on episode 9, where I talked to Dr. Björn Brembs about the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). The JIF is a metric designed to measure the impact a journal had in the scientific community. There are many problems with how JIFs are generated. What is even w...

2018-10-2800 min

Recovering Academic Season 3 Episode 4: Interview with Dennis EckmeierIn this week of the Recovering Academic podcast we talk with Dr. Dennis Eckmeier, his journey outside academia and his actual advocacy projects, including the Science for Progress podcast and its twitter rotating twitter account @SfPRocur. This was a joint podcast between the Recovering Academic and the Science for Progress podcasts, so we all discuss our reasons for leaving academia and realized Amanda was the only one of us that never did any experiments in the dark! There's always the transition period, but after you decide that you're going to do it, it feels good. @Doctor_PMS One of the...

2018-10-2707 min

Science for Progress We are on Patreon! – and other announcements.Just some announcements this time In contrast to what was promised in the last podcast episode, we don't have a full question and answer episode this time. I hope this will not happen too often, in future. Dennis is a freelancer now. First thing is that I quit my postdoctoral fellowship to become a freelancer. You can see how I approach this on my website. Basically I want to offer my skills and expertise in scholarship and neuroscience to help people with their academic writing, be it papers or funding applications. This means that I am currently a bit low...

2018-09-3000 min

Science for Progress 9: The Journal Impact Factor: how (not) to evaluate researchers – with Björn BrembsWhat is the Journal Impact Factor? The Journal Impact Factor is widely used as a tool to evaluate studies, and researchers. It supposedly measures the quality of a journal by scoring how many citations an average article in this journal achieves. Committees making hiring and funding decisions use the 'JIF' as an approximation for the quality of the work a researcher has published, and in extension as an approximation for the capabilities of an applicant. Listen to the Full Conversation on Patreon! JIF as a measure of researcher merit I find this practice already highly questionable. First of all, it...

2018-09-1600 min

Science for Societal Progress 9: The Journal Impact Factor: how (not) to evaluate researchers – with Björn BrembsWhat is the Journal Impact Factor? The Journal Impact Factor is widely used as a tool to evaluate studies, and researchers. It supposedly measures the quality of a journal by scoring how many citations an average article in this journal achieves. Committees making hiring and funding decisions use the ‘JIF’ as an approximation for the quality of the work a researcher has published, and in extension as an approximation for the capabilities of an applicant. JIF as a measure of researcher merit I find this practice already highly questionable. Firs...

2018-09-1633 min

Open Science Radio OSR098 Academic Publishing Infrastructures with Björn Brembs [EN]Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Academic publishing that is. And actually not only in Denmark. Even though open access publishing has picked up quite a bit over the last years, academic publishing today is still rather dominated by legacy publishers who mainly play their old game without much signs of changing and adapting to current technological and scientific developments. In fact, many of them are not even showing much willingness to consider changing. A lot of the recent studies and arguments point out that a complete transition to open access publishing potentially yields many positive social...

2018-03-011h 39

Open Science Radio OSR008 Mendeley, Zweitverwertungsrecht, Open Science bei NPG, Science Crowdfunding und PodcastsNach etwas längerer Pause (mea culpa!) gibt es in Folge 8 wieder Neuigkeiten zu Open Access rund um die Übernahme von Mendeley durch Elsevier, das Zweitverwertungsrecht, eine Studie und Nature. Dazu gibt’s noch kurze News zu Open Science und Sciencestarter-Projekten und schließlich ein paar Podcastempfehlungen aus dem wissenschaftlichen Raum. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License Teilnehmer Matthias Fromm Twitter GitHub Website ORCiD Linkedin Website Thomann Wishlist Amazon Wishlist Shownotes: OSR008 Mendeley, Zweitverwertungsrecht, Open Science bei NPG, Science Crowdfunding und Podcasts Teilnehmer:...

2013-04-231h 05

This Week in Science – The Kickass Science Podcast This Week in Science - Tuesday June 19, 2007 BroadcastAnnouncements!, Break-up Boobies, Justin's Science Factoids, Humanizing Monkeys, Space Station Shenanigans, Physics Gets Heavy, Fossilized Suffering, & Interview W/ Dr. Bjorn Brembs re: Free Will and Fruit Flies

2007-06-1959 min