Shows
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Galette v. New Jersey Transit (Sovereign Immunity)Send a textIn 1979, the New Jersey Legislature created the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Transit) as a “body corporate and politic with corporatesuccession” and constituted it as an “instrumentality of the State exercising public and essential governmental functions” but “independent of any supervision or control” by the New Jersey Department ofTransportation. N. J. Stat. §27:25–4(a). The State gave NJ Transitsignificant authority, including the power to make bylaws, sue and besued, make contracts, acquire property, raise funds, own corporate entities, adopt regulations, and exercise eminent domain powers.§§27:25–5, 27:25–13. NJ Transit’s organic statute provides that “[n]o
2026-03-0413 min
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Galette v. New Jersey Transit (Sovereign Immunity)Send a textIn 1979, the New Jersey Legislature created the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Transit) as a “body corporate and politic with corporatesuccession” and constituted it as an “instrumentality of the State exercising public and essential governmental functions” but “independent of any supervision or control” by the New Jersey Department ofTransportation. N. J. Stat. §27:25–4(a). The State gave NJ Transitsignificant authority, including the power to make bylaws, sue and besued, make contracts, acquire property, raise funds, own corporate entities, adopt regulations, and exercise eminent domain powers.§§27:25–5, 27:25–13. NJ Transit’s organic sta...
2026-03-0413 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability)Send a textPetitioner GEO Group operates a private detention facility in Aurora, Colorado, under a contract with U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Respondent Alejandro Menocal, a former detainee at the Aurora facility, initiated this class action, alleging GEO’s work policies for detainees violate a federal bar on forced labor and Colorado’s prohibition on unjust enrichment. GEO responded that the suit must be dismissed under Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Constr. Co., 309 U. S. 18, which held that a federal contractor cannot be held liable for conduct that the Government has lawfully “authorized and directed” the contractor to perform...
2026-02-2608 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)GEO Group v. Menocal (Civil Procedure/Appealability)Send a textPetitioner GEO Group operates a private detention facility in Aurora, Colorado, under a contract with U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Respondent Alejandro Menocal, a former detainee at the Aurora facility, initiated this class action, alleging GEO’s work policies for detainees violate a federal bar on forced labor and Colorado’s prohibition on unjust enrichment. GEO responded that the suit must be dismissed under Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Constr. Co., 309 U. S. 18, which held that a federal contractor cannot be held liable for conduct that the Government has lawfully “authorized and direct...
2026-02-2608 min
impopulaire💿 17 · michael medrano, annie-dog, chéri, eli (ft. LavandeTV)Dans la tracklist de cet épisode : ⟡ Jade nous propose un shot de pop-pers.♡ Nicolas explore une pop indie, glitchée et solitaire.✩ Gaëtan émeut toute la rédac avec un projet déjà culte.๑ LavandeTV nous dévoile le visage de la pop DIY2K. 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐞, c’est le podcast où l'on parle de pop music pas populaire.
Un mardi sur deux et à tour de rôle, chacun·e de nous présente un projet pop que l’on estime sous-côté ou prometteur.⠀⠀⠀⠀CRÉDITS MUSICAUX ET RÉFÉRENCESMichael Medrano, présenté par Jade "Do Y...
2026-02-101h 38
Lake Champlain, Vermont/New York Fishing Report TodayLake Champlain Fishing Report: Summer Winds and Smallmouth BonanzaIt’s Sunday, August 31st, and I’m Artificial Lure with your Lake Champlain fishing report.We kicked off the morning at 6:13 AM with a vibrant sunrise out across the water (sunset will be about 7:32 PM tonight), under partly cloudy skies and temperatures in the mid-60s rising to low 70s by noon—no major fronts today, just a classic Champlain summer tapering into September. Winds are light from the north, five to ten knots, keeping the surface calm for both boat and bank anglers.Lake Champlain isn’t tidal so there’s no tide forecast, but you will n...
2025-08-3103 min
Pitcher List Fantasy BaseballFBB 029 - Trade Deadline SpeculationThe Fantasy Baseball BeatTrade Deadline SpeculationWelcome to the Fantasy Baseball BeatToday, Mike and Dave discuss their thoughts on the wildest trade deadline in years. First, they look at the biggest names that were not dealt. Players discussed: Zac Gallen, Dylan Cease, Raisel Iglesias, Joe Ryan, Luis Robert Jr..Dave goes through the teams that he thinks did the best job trading at the deadline. Teams addressed:Baltimore OriolesSan Diego PadresHouston AstrosArizona DiamondbacksSeattle MarinersLos Angeles DodgersDave then gives the teams whose moves he questions the most...
2025-08-021h 15
Standing Ground With Jeremy LeahyJeremy Leahy/Standing GroundSuspend Habeas Corpus? YES.Jake Tapper's Book. Oh ....We Were Wrong! ( Biden Was A Mess.- NO SHIT!)Comey 86/47. He Knew.
2025-05-221h 33
N.F.W. Podcast Classics177 NFW SuperstitionNewty off for the night so Jake hosts along with Gary , Willis & TJAfter George Leahy (Larry Pennell) moves with his wife and kids to a large and very old New England house, strange and deadly occurrences begin to happen. Eventually, it is revealed that a vengeful witch haunts the home, and nothing seems to appease the evil spirit. Intent on stopping the carnage, Inspector Sturgess (Albert Salmi) and the Rev. David Thompson (James Houghton) join together to rid the place of the sinister force, but the witch isn't easily vanquished.
2025-04-201h 26
True Crime Case FilesWedding Ends in Murder after Husband Exposes Wife's Humiliating SecretA shocking wedding night murder rocked Southaven, Mississippi, in 2019 when 24-year-old Carson Gregory was arrested for killing her new husband, Jake Reynolds. What started as a dream wedding quickly turned into a nightmare after Jake humiliated Carson in front of their guests, exposing her deepest secret. Investigators soon uncovered a tangled web of betrayal, family secrets, and a scandalous affair between Jake and Carson’s own mother.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/true-crime-case-files--6127499/support.Hey True Crime Case Solvers, want more exclusive in-depth true crime full of exclusive content yo...
2025-03-0621 min
Bat Flips and Infield ShiftsEpisode 147: The Padres and Diamondbacks are on fire and it's time to bury some teamsGreg and Brendan breakdown the NL West race, discuss MLB's recent rule change ideas, and hold a funeral for several teams that are out of the postseason race.Parity (05:00)NL West race (11:08)Jake Burger (22:24)Kyle Leahy (37:03)Kirby Yates (42:30)MLB Pipeline Top 100 (47:30)Jarren Duran (54:30)LLWS Gambling (58:47)MLB rule changes (1:03:30)Dead teams (1:16:45)Intro music: California - Swole Sauce, Spirit LinkOutro music: Chrysalis (Two to One) - Tritonal, Linney, Johan Vilborg, Adam Szab
2024-08-171h 53Bat Flips and Infield ShiftsEpisode 147: The Padres and Diamondbacks are on fire and it's time to bury some teamsGreg and Brendan breakdown the NL West race, discuss MLB's recent rule change ideas, and hold a funeral for several teams that are out of the postseason race.Parity (05:00)NL West race (11:08)Jake Burger (22:24)Kyle Leahy (37:03)Kirby Yates (42:30)MLB Pipeline Top 100 (47:30)Jarren Duran (54:30)LLWS Gambling (58:47)MLB rule changes (1:03:30)Dead teams (1:16:45)Intro music: California - Swole Sauce, Spirit LinkOutro music: Chrysalis (Two to One) - Tritonal, Linney, Johan Vilborg, Adam Szab
2024-08-171h 53True Crime Case FilesHusband Found Dead: Wife's Chilling Confession RevealedDiscover the gripping true crime tale of Jake Malton's tragic murder in Naperville, Illinois, February 2012. This episode unravels the chilling details: from the discovery of Jake's body, shot in his bedroom, to the shocking revelation of his wife Laura Beth's involvement. Follow the police investigation, suspects' interrogations and the dramatic trial that ensued.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/true-crime-case-files--6127499/support.Hey True Crime Case Solvers, want more exclusive in-depth true crime full of exclusive content you won’t find anywhere else?CLICK HERE or just search True Crime Ca...
2024-07-0921 min
Learning FuturesASU FOLC Fest 2024 Part 4In this episode Sean and Jake keep the conversation rolling from the first annual ASU FOLC Fest through highlights from our conversations with Megan Workmon and Medhansh Garg. Throughout this episode we explore insightful discussion on the intersection of technology, education, and creativity. Key Highlights: Insights from the first ever Future of Learning Community Festival held at ASUTalking with Megan we learn a lot about her role at ASU and her influence on learning experience designWe learn about projects blending technology and education, focusing on ethical considerations and the human element in learningImportance of balancing technological ef...
2024-05-0753 minLearning FuturesASU FOLC Fest 2024 Part 3In this third installment of the ASU FOLC Fest Compendium - Sean and Jake turn to the conversations with Scotty Craig, Chelsea Schlesinger, and Karla Murphy on transformative approaches and innovative methods and experiences in integrating technology and student-centered strategies in education.Some Key Points Discussed: Technology in Learning: Scotty elaborates on the role of AI and other digital tools in reshaping educational environments, focusing on their practical use in classrooms to make learning more engaging and effective.Interactive Syllabus: Chelsea and Karla detail their method of turning syllabus review into an interactive, engaging process that e...
2024-04-3037 minLearning FuturesASU FOLC Fest 2024 Part 2In this episode, Sean and Jake pickup where they left off exploring more experiences from the first ASU FOLC Fest, featuring interviews from Kenzie Hurst Newton and Mike Stordeur, Dee-Dee Collins-Jones, and Joy Griffin around the use of artificial intelligence in education, the integration of VR into learning environments, and the impactful ways in which these technologies are reshaping educational practices.This episode highlights the ongoing innovations at ASU, showcasing the university's commitment to integrating cutting-edge technologies like AI and VR into education. The discussions provide valuable insights for educators looking to enhance their teaching methods and...
2024-04-2344 minLearning FuturesASU FOLC Fest 2024 Part 1In this episode, Sean and Jake (producer) talk about the pop-up podcast studio at the first ever ASU FOLC Fest – a learning festival dedicated to the integration of technology in education, and the potential impacts on teaching and student success. Special guests include Danielle McNamara and Retha Hill who are pushing the boundaries of educational practice.This episode is the first of 5 of our special coverage of the ASU FOLC Fest: The Future of Learning Community or FOLC Fest was a two-day interactive conference hosted by the Office of the University Provost that brought together folk...
2024-04-1745 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Wilkinson v. Garland (Immigration)Send a textWilkinson v. Garland Congress gives immigration judges discretionary power to cancel the removal of a noncitizen and instead permit the noncitizen to remain in the country lawfully. 8 U. S. C. §§1229b(a)–(b). An IJ faced with an application for cancellation of removal proceeds in two steps: The IJ must decide first whether the noncitizen is eligible for cancellation of removal under the statutory criteria. If the IJ finds the noncitizen statutorily eligible, the IJ must then decide whether to exercise discretion and grant relief. For determining eligibility, Congress has enumerated four statu...
2024-03-2108 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Wilkinson v. Garland (Immigration)Send us a textWilkinson v. Garland Congress gives immigration judges discretionary power to cancel the removal of a noncitizen and instead permit the noncitizen to remain in the country lawfully. 8 U. S. C. §§1229b(a)–(b). An IJ faced with an application for cancellation of removal proceeds in two steps: The IJ must decide first whether the noncitizen is eligible for cancellation of removal under the statutory criteria. If the IJ finds the noncitizen statutorily eligible, the IJ must then decide whether to exercise discretion and grant relief. For determining eligibility, Congress has enumerated four statutory criteria, one of wh...
2024-03-2108 min
The Mike and Tony ShowEpisode 180After two days of non-stop snowfall, we sat down for an early Saturday morning podcast with our good friend, Dan Leahy of CU Boulder. We talked about kids maturing, growing pains, Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson, beard trimming, education, brain studies, dry sauna, insurance policies, coffee, Steve Bartlett, and much, much more!m&t
2024-03-1700 min
DUK DogsDUK Dogs #129: Spring Training and Erin's Time at River StoneThis week, Josh sits down with Erin Leahy to discuss the importance of obedience before spring training, Erin's time at River Stone and what working in this industry entails.
2024-03-0649 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Trump v. Anderson (Per Curiam -- Majority)Send a textTrump v. Anderson A group of Colorado voters contends that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits former President Donald J. Trump, who seeks the Presidential nomination of the Republican Party in this year’s election, from becoming President again. The Colorado Supreme Court agreed with that contention. It ordered the Colorado secretary of state to exclude the former President from the Republican primary ballot in the State and to disregard any write-in votes that Colorado voters might cast for him. Former President Trump challenges that decision on several grounds. Be...
2024-03-0524 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Trump v. Anderson (Per Curiam -- Majority)Send us a textTrump v. Anderson A group of Colorado voters contends that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits former President Donald J. Trump, who seeks the Presidential nomination of the Republican Party in this year’s election, from becoming President again. The Colorado Supreme Court agreed with that contention. It ordered the Colorado secretary of state to exclude the former President from the Republican primary ballot in the State and to disregard any write-in votes that Colorado voters might cast for him. Former President Trump challenges that decision on several grounds. Because the Constitution ma...
2024-03-0524 minDUK DogsDUK Dogs #125: New Year, New Ideas and New ImportsA new year is here and new ideas are being tossed about. Josh wrapped up his waterfowl season a little early as mother nature froze things up in Arkansas but that doesn't mean the hunting is over. He is joined by his wife Whitney and River Stone Kennels office manager Erin Leahy to chat about new podcast ideas, the new pheasant ranch and a recap of the waterfowl season. This year will be full of adventure, fun and putting duck dogs in the upland field. www.eukanubasportingdog.com www.riverstonekennels.com www.retrieverroadmap.c...
2024-01-2653 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer (ADA / Mootness)Send us a textThe Supreme Court granted certiorari to address a circuit split -- whether Deborah Laufer has Article III standing to sue hotels that fail to include information about accessibility accommodations as required by the ADA. She sued hundreds of hotels, most of which she never intended on trying to stay at. After her lawyer faced sanctions, Laufer decided to voluntarily dismiss her case/s. She asked the Supreme Court to vacate her case as moot. Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, agreed. The judgment is vacated and remanded to the First Circuit for dismissal. Read by Jake A. Leahy...
2023-12-0602 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer (ADA / Mootness)Send a textThe Supreme Court granted certiorari to address a circuit split -- whether Deborah Laufer has Article III standing to sue hotels that fail to include information about accessibility accommodations as required by the ADA. She sued hundreds of hotels, most of which she never intended on trying to stay at. After her lawyer faced sanctions, Laufer decided to voluntarily dismiss her case/s. She asked the Supreme Court to vacate her case as moot. Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, agreed. The judgment is vacated and remanded to the First Circuit for dismissal. Read by Ja...
2023-12-0602 min
The Pesto PodBeverages with Jake CornellNothings beats the feeling of taking a big gulp of a 1 liter bottle of Polar ruby grapefruit sparkling water and no one knows that better than Jake Cornell! Join us as we recount our ultrasound trauma, discuss the intricate nuances of iced coffee, and honor the lore of the original Four Loko. Grab the beverage of your choice and crack it open for this thirst-quenching episode.
2023-11-1746 min
Coffee with the DogMonday Morning Yuks - EP495Hour 1
GERRY HODGES IS A VETERAN COMEDIC TALENT THAT HAS PERFORMED ALL OVER CANADA.
HE STARTED HIS COMEDY CAREER IN HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA WITH THE 'COMEDY DAWGS' THROUGH FELLOW VETERAN COMIC PAUL ASH. GERRY HAS BEEN ACTIVE SINCE 2006.
HE USES HIS MIX OF TONGUE-IN-CHEEK STYLE WITH A STRAIGHT FORWARD/QUIRKY PERSONALITY TO ENTERTAIN CROWDS. HE HAS OPENED & WORKED ALONG SIDE COMEDIC TALENTS SUCH AS JIM LEAHY (TRAILER PARK BOYS), TRACEY MACDONALD (CBS 'STAR SEARCH'), DYLAN RHYMER & WAFIK NASRELLA (COMEDY NOW!), SHAWN MAJUMDER (THIS HOUR HAS 22 MINUTES), NATHAN MACINTOSH (THE TONIGHT SHOW, THE LATE SHOW WITH STEPHEN COLBERT & CONAN), GAVIN...
2023-11-062h 21
Learning FuturesSc(AI)ry StoriesIn the spirit of Halloween - Sean (with the help of producer extraordinaire Jake) pull together a fun compendium of short stories from some of our colleagues and listeners for a special “spooky” episode of the Learning Futures Podcast. The Challenge: Create an original short story (about, with, or through) Generative AI, in the spirit of emerging technologies, AI, the future of humanity etc. in the spirit of Halloween. These can be any genre, they can be spooky, funny, creepy, suspenseful, thought provoking, thoughtful, or any combination of the lot. Have fun with this idea. It could be cre...
2023-10-3138 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Biden v. Nebraska (Student Loans)Send us a textIn Biden v. Nebraska, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the HEROES Act authorized the Secretary of Education to unilaterally forgive $10,000 of student loans for most borrowers. The Court held that the Secretary does not have this power under HEROES Act, despite the language that allows the Secretary to "waive or modify" certain student loan provisions. Read by Jake A. Leahy.
2023-09-1913 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Biden v. Nebraska (Student Loans)Send a textIn Biden v. Nebraska, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the HEROES Act authorized the Secretary of Education to unilaterally forgive $10,000 of student loans for most borrowers. The Court held that the Secretary does not have this power under HEROES Act, despite the language that allows the Secretary to "waive or modify" certain student loan provisions. Read by Jake A. Leahy.
2023-09-1913 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Department of Education v. Brown (Student Loans / Standing)Send us a textIn Department of Education v. Brown, the Supreme Court reviewed whether a person who was expecting student loan forgiveness, but not the maximum amount, had Article III standing to sue. The Court found that those individuals lacked standing to bring their challenge to the student loan forgiveness plan. Read by Jake A. Leahy.
2023-08-2709 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Department of Education v. Brown (Student Loans / Standing)Send a textIn Department of Education v. Brown, the Supreme Court reviewed whether a person who was expecting student loan forgiveness, but not the maximum amount, had Article III standing to sue. The Court found that those individuals lacked standing to bring their challenge to the student loan forgiveness plan. Read by Jake A. Leahy.
2023-08-2709 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Abitron v. Hetronic (Lanham Act)Send us a textIn Abitron v. Hetronic, the Supreme Court answered whether certain sections of the Lanham Act were unconstitutionally extraterritorial. To decide this issue, the Court applies a two-part test. It first looks to: 1) whether “Congress has affirmatively and unmistakably instructed for the statute to regulate foreign conduct; and if part-one finds it is not extraterritorial, the analysis turns to 2) whether the statute seeks a (permissible) domestic or (impermissible) foreign application of the statute in question. Justice Alito, writing for the majority, held that the Lanham Act is not extraterritorial, it did not adopt the position that any claim und...
2023-08-1810 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Abitron v. Hetronic (Lanham Act)Send a textIn Abitron v. Hetronic, the Supreme Court answered whether certain sections of the Lanham Act were unconstitutionally extraterritorial. To decide this issue, the Court applies a two-part test. It first looks to: 1) whether “Congress has affirmatively and unmistakably instructed for the statute to regulate foreign conduct; and if part-one finds it is not extraterritorial, the analysis turns to 2) whether the statute seeks a (permissible) domestic or (impermissible) foreign application of the statute in question. Justice Alito, writing for the majority, held that the Lanham Act is not extraterritorial, it did not adopt the position tha...
2023-08-1810 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Co. (Personal Jurisidction)Send us a textWhether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a State from requiring an out of state corporation to consent to personal jurisdiction in order to do business in the state. Mallory, a Virginia resident, brought suit against Norfolk Southern Railway Company under Pennsylvania Law -- claiming carcinogen exposure in Ohio and Virginia. Norfolk Southern rebutted the suit with a constitutional argument, arguing that the Pennsylvania court lacked personal jurisdiction against the Virginia company. Although Pennsylvania law requires a registered foreign corporation to answer any suit brought against it within the Commonwealth. The Pennsylvania court ruled...
2023-08-1606 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Co. (Personal Jurisidction)Send a textWhether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a State from requiring an out of state corporation to consent to personal jurisdiction in order to do business in the state. Mallory, a Virginia resident, brought suit against Norfolk Southern Railway Company under Pennsylvania Law -- claiming carcinogen exposure in Ohio and Virginia. Norfolk Southern rebutted the suit with a constitutional argument, arguing that the Pennsylvania court lacked personal jurisdiction against the Virginia company. Although Pennsylvania law requires a registered foreign corporation to answer any suit brought against it within the Commonwealth. The...
2023-08-1606 minLearning FuturesSelects: Futures of Equity in Education (S4E7)This re-released episode features the full audio recording and notes from the original broadcast: July 26, 2022. We (Jake) hopes you'll enjoy revisiting this ever timely topic for the Futures of Learning! --- Original Show Notes ---Hosts Clarin Collins and Sean Leahy talk with Jill Koyama and Daniel Liou about the continuing disparities that are present in education. Starting out on a global level, our guests react to the UNESCO report on reimagining the future of education, talking about the importance of recognizing and building curriculums that represent the diversity of the current student and teacher p...
2023-07-2555 minLearning FuturesSummer VibesIn this short bonus episode Sean talks with Learning Futures producer Jacob Snider about Jake's summer take-over of the show. Jake shares a little preview of the episodes he will re-release over the next few weeks as the rest of the podcast team gears up for Season 6.
2023-07-2403 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Coinbase, Inc. v. BielskiSend a textIn Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, the Supreme Court reviewed whether a district court must stay proceedings while an interlocutory appeal is pending regarding the arbitrability of the claim is ongoing. Writing for an (in part) 5-4 and (in part) 6-3 majority, Justice Kavanaugh answers in the affirmative, stating that while an interlocutory appeal is pending about whether the case should go to arbitration, the district court must stay proceedings. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-3006 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Coinbase, Inc. v. BielskiSend us a textIn Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, the Supreme Court reviewed whether a district court must stay proceedings while an interlocutory appeal is pending regarding the arbitrability of the claim is ongoing. Writing for an (in part) 5-4 and (in part) 6-3 majority, Justice Kavanaugh answers in the affirmative, stating that while an interlocutory appeal is pending about whether the case should go to arbitration, the district court must stay proceedings. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-3006 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Samia v. United States (Confrontation Clause)Send a textIn Samia v. United States, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the confrontation clause is violated when a confession one of the co-defendants that implicitly implicates one of the other co-defendants violates the confrontation clause. The Court held that it does not. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-3011 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Samia v. United States (Confrontation Clause)Send us a textIn Samia v. United States, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the confrontation clause is violated when a confession one of the co-defendants that implicitly implicates one of the other co-defendants violates the confrontation clause. The Court held that it does not. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-3011 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Pugin v. Garland (Immigration)Send a textIn Pugin v. Garland, the Court reviewed "whether an offense 'relat[es] to obstruction of justice' under §1101(a)(43)(S) even if the offense does not require that an investigation or proceeding be pending. Dictionary definitions, federal laws, state laws, and the Model Penal Code show that the answer is yes: An offense “relat[es] to obstruction of justice” even if the offense does not require that an investigation or proceeding be pending." Jake Leahy, Host.
2023-06-2704 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Pugin v. Garland (Immigration)Send us a textIn Pugin v. Garland, the Court reviewed "whether an offense 'relat[es] to obstruction of justice' under §1101(a)(43)(S) even if the offense does not require that an investigation or proceeding be pending. Dictionary definitions, federal laws, state laws, and the Model Penal Code show that the answer is yes: An offense “relat[es] to obstruction of justice” even if the offense does not require that an investigation or proceeding be pending." Jake Leahy, Host.
2023-06-2704 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Yegiazaryan v. Smagin (Jurisdiction / RICO)Send us a textIn Yegiazaryan v. Smagin, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the United States district court has jurisdiction over a Civil RICO claim where the plaintiff is a foreign national (who resides in Russia) who has pleaded an injury based on his "his efforts to execute on a California judgment in California against a California resident were foiled by a pattern of racketeering activity that largely occurred in California and was designed to subvert enforcement of the judgment there. " Held: A plaintiff has sufficiently alleged a domestic injury when the circumstances surrounding the injury took place in the United S...
2023-06-2312 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Yegiazaryan v. Smagin (Jurisdiction / RICO)Send a textIn Yegiazaryan v. Smagin, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the United States district court has jurisdiction over a Civil RICO claim where the plaintiff is a foreign national (who resides in Russia) who has pleaded an injury based on his "his efforts to execute on a California judgment in California against a California resident were foiled by a pattern of racketeering activity that largely occurred in California and was designed to subvert enforcement of the judgment there. " Held: A plaintiff has sufficiently alleged a domestic injury when the circumstances surrounding the injury took place i...
2023-06-2312 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Jones v. Hendrix (Prisoner's Rights)Send a textIn Jones v. Hendrix, the Supreme Court reviewed whether a prisoner can bring a habeas petition after the Supreme Court retroactively overruled Circuit Court precedent that would have allowed him to previously challenge his conviction. Held: The prisoner cannot circumvent the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, by filing a habeas petition after a change in the law based on the interpretation of a statute. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-2314 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Jones v. Hendrix (Prisoner's Rights)Send us a textIn Jones v. Hendrix, the Supreme Court reviewed whether a prisoner can bring a habeas petition after the Supreme Court retroactively overruled Circuit Court precedent that would have allowed him to previously challenge his conviction. Held: The prisoner cannot circumvent the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, by filing a habeas petition after a change in the law based on the interpretation of a statute. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-2314 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc.Send a textIn U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, the Supreme Court reviewed whether, in a qui tam False Claims Act action, the government can move to dismiss the case after not intervening during the so-called "seal" period. Writing for the 8-1 majority, Justice Kagan writes that the government may move to dismiss the False Claims Act action at anytime - so long as the government had intervened at some point, but regardless of the intervention was during the seal period or after. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-2113 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc.Send us a textIn U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, the Supreme Court reviewed whether, in a qui tam False Claims Act action, the government can move to dismiss the case after not intervening during the so-called "seal" period. Writing for the 8-1 majority, Justice Kagan writes that the government may move to dismiss the False Claims Act action at anytime - so long as the government had intervened at some point, but regardless of the intervention was during the seal period or after. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-2113 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Smith v. United States (Venue and Double Jeopardy)Send a textIn Smith v. United States, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the principle of double-jeopardy prevents a person from being retried after a trial took place in the incorrect venue and the jury was selected from the incorrect district. In a unanimous decisions, Justice Alito writes that the defendant is entitled to set aside the jury's conviction, but that a new trial in a proper venue is appropriate. Read by Jake A. Leahy.
2023-06-2009 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Smith v. United States (Venue and Double Jeopardy)Send us a textIn Smith v. United States, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the principle of double-jeopardy prevents a person from being retried after a trial took place in the incorrect venue and the jury was selected from the incorrect district. In a unanimous decisions, Justice Alito writes that the defendant is entitled to set aside the jury's conviction, but that a new trial in a proper venue is appropriate. Read by Jake A. Leahy.
2023-06-2009 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin (Tribal Bankruptcy)Send a textIn Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin, the Supreme Court whether Congress abrogated tribal sovereignty in the Bankruptcy Code. Writing for the majority, Justice Kagan rules that Congress unequivocally abrogated tribal sovereign immunity in the Bankruptcy Code. Kagan reasons that "foreign or domestic" governments is a term such as "here or there;" meaning it encompasses all forms of governments anywhere. As the sole dissenter, Justice Gorsuch reasons that the words should construed more narrowly - that if Congress intended to abrogate tribal immunity, it would have done so. Hosted b...
2023-06-1908 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin (Tribal Bankruptcy)Send us a textIn Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin, the Supreme Court whether Congress abrogated tribal sovereignty in the Bankruptcy Code. Writing for the majority, Justice Kagan rules that Congress unequivocally abrogated tribal sovereign immunity in the Bankruptcy Code. Kagan reasons that "foreign or domestic" governments is a term such as "here or there;" meaning it encompasses all forms of governments anywhere. As the sole dissenter, Justice Gorsuch reasons that the words should construed more narrowly - that if Congress intended to abrogate tribal immunity, it would have done so. Hosted by Jake A. L...
2023-06-1908 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion Cty. v. Talevski (1983 Nursing Homes)Send a textIn Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion Cty. v. Talevski, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act (FBHRA) provides a right of action under Section 1983 against a privately owned nursing home that received Medicaid funds. Hosted by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-0911 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion Cty. v. Talevski (1983 Nursing Homes)Send us a textIn Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion Cty. v. Talevski, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act (FBHRA) provides a right of action under Section 1983 against a privately owned nursing home that received Medicaid funds. Hosted by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-0911 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Dubin v. United States (Medicaid Fraud)Send a textIn Dubin v. United States, the Supreme Court reviewed whether a person who commits Medicaid fraud through fraudulent billing can also be convicted for statutory aggravated identity theft. The Court ruled for Dubin, holding that the aggravated identity theft charge can only be applied when the identity theft was at the crux of the crime, not if the fraud happened to involve personal information (here, the Medicaid number). Hosted by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-0912 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Allen v. Milligan (Racial Gerrymandering)Send a textIn Allen v. Milligan, the Supreme Court reviewed whether Alabama’s Congressional maps violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. A three-judge district court panel found that the plaintiffs demonstrated a sufficient likelihood on success on the merits against Alabama. Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, affirmed. Read by Host, Jake Leahy.
2023-06-0921 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Allen v. Milligan (Racial Gerrymandering)Send us a textIn Allen v. Milligan, the Supreme Court reviewed whether Alabama’s Congressional maps violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. A three-judge district court panel found that the plaintiffs demonstrated a sufficient likelihood on success on the merits against Alabama. Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, affirmed. Read by Host, Jake Leahy.
2023-06-0921 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Dubin v. United States (Medicaid Fraud)Send us a textIn Dubin v. United States, the Supreme Court reviewed whether a person who commits Medicaid fraud through fraudulent billing can also be convicted for statutory aggravated identity theft. The Court ruled for Dubin, holding that the aggravated identity theft charge can only be applied when the identity theft was at the crux of the crime, not if the fraud happened to involve personal information (here, the Medicaid number). Hosted by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-0912 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Glacier Northwest v. Teamsters (Labor)Send us a textIn Glacier Northwest v. Teamsters, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the National Labor Relations Act preempts Glacier's state tort law claims that allege the Teamsters intentionally destroyed the company's concrete trucks when the truckers did not complete their deliveries in transit. The Court held that these claims were not preempted by federal law, reasoning that it is well-established that the NLRA does not protect striking workers who fail to take reasonable precautions to protect against property damage. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-0208 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Glacier Northwest v. Teamsters (Labor)Send a textIn Glacier Northwest v. Teamsters, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the National Labor Relations Act preempts Glacier's state tort law claims that allege the Teamsters intentionally destroyed the company's concrete trucks when the truckers did not complete their deliveries in transit. The Court held that these claims were not preempted by federal law, reasoning that it is well-established that the NLRA does not protect striking workers who fail to take reasonable precautions to protect against property damage. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-06-0208 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Dupree v. Younger (1983 Post-Trial Motion)Send us a textIn Dupree v. Younger, the Supreme Court addressed whether a post-trial motion of a purely legal issue that was resolved at summary judgment, requires a post-trial motion to be preserved on appeal. Kevin Younger sued Neil Dupree, who was a correctional officer under Section 1983. Dupree moved for summary judgment alleging that Younger had failed to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court denied the motion. After Younger prevailed at trial by obtaining $700,000 in damages, Dupree appealed alleging the district court improperly dismissed the suit. Under Fourth Circuit precedent, that court ruled against Younger reasoning that he was required...
2023-05-2805 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Dupree v. Younger (1983 Post-Trial Motion)Send a textIn Dupree v. Younger, the Supreme Court addressed whether a post-trial motion of a purely legal issue that was resolved at summary judgment, requires a post-trial motion to be preserved on appeal. Kevin Younger sued Neil Dupree, who was a correctional officer under Section 1983. Dupree moved for summary judgment alleging that Younger had failed to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court denied the motion. After Younger prevailed at trial by obtaining $700,000 in damages, Dupree appealed alleging the district court improperly dismissed the suit. Under Fourth Circuit precedent, that court ruled against Younger reasoning that...
2023-05-2805 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Calcutt v. FDIC (Administrative Review)Send us a textThe Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, reasoning that the Court of Appeals must reverse the administrative agency if it reaches the same outcome for a different reason. Once an administrative agency has made an error of law, the decision must be remanded back to the administrative agency. Per Curiam. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-05-2313 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Calcutt v. FDIC (Administrative Review)Send a textThe Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, reasoning that the Court of Appeals must reverse the administrative agency if it reaches the same outcome for a different reason. Once an administrative agency has made an error of law, the decision must be remanded back to the administrative agency. Per Curiam. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-05-2313 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Gonzalez v. Google (Section 230)Send us a textOn the same day, the Court released its decision in Twitter v. Taamneh. The Court largely disposed of the claims in Twitter, stating that Taamneh had failed to state a claim under the federal statute. Here, the Court in its per curiam opinion, writes that it need not consider the veracity of the Section 230 claims because Twitter's reasoning requires disposal of the claims here. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-05-2004 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Gonzalez v. Google (Section 230)Send a textOn the same day, the Court released its decision in Twitter v. Taamneh. The Court largely disposed of the claims in Twitter, stating that Taamneh had failed to state a claim under the federal statute. Here, the Court in its per curiam opinion, writes that it need not consider the veracity of the Section 230 claims because Twitter's reasoning requires disposal of the claims here. Read by Jake Leahy.
2023-05-2004 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi (Patent)Send us a textThe patent requires certain particularity, such that any person skilled in the craft would be able to manufacture, make, construct, or use the invention. The Court held that Amgen's patent failed to provide the detail required to protect its interest, in part, because the patent applies to a wide range of antibodies and requires a certain level of trial/error for a skilled person to replicate it. A pharmaceutical patent case. Gorsuch delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court. Read by Jake Leahy. Contact us at scotusdecisions@gmail.com.
2023-05-2011 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi (Patent)Send a textThe patent requires certain particularity, such that any person skilled in the craft would be able to manufacture, make, construct, or use the invention. The Court held that Amgen's patent failed to provide the detail required to protect its interest, in part, because the patent applies to a wide range of antibodies and requires a certain level of trial/error for a skilled person to replicate it. A pharmaceutical patent case. Gorsuch delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court. Read by Jake Leahy. Contact us at scotusdecisions@gmail.com.
2023-05-2011 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc. (Sovereign Immunity)Send us a text"The question presented is whether the statute categorically abrogates (legalspeak for eliminates) any sovereign immunity the board enjoys from legal claims. We hold it does not. Under long-settled law, Congress must use unmistakable language to abrogate sovereign immunity. Nothing in the statute creating the board meets that high bar." (First paragraph of Justice Kagan's majority opinion). The Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA) was enacted in 2016 to address Puerto Rico's financial crisis, established the Board as an entity within the territorial government of Puerto Rico. The Court held that nothing in P...
2023-05-1508 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc. (Sovereign Immunity)Send a text"The question presented is whether the statute categorically abrogates (legalspeak for eliminates) any sovereign immunity the board enjoys from legal claims. We hold it does not. Under long-settled law, Congress must use unmistakable language to abrogate sovereign immunity. Nothing in the statute creating the board meets that high bar." (First paragraph of Justice Kagan's majority opinion). The Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA) was enacted in 2016 to address Puerto Rico's financial crisis, established the Board as an entity within the territorial government of Puerto Rico. The Court held that n...
2023-05-1508 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Ciminelli v. United States (Wire Fraud)Send us a textIn Ciminelli v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Circuit's right-to-control theory of wire fraud cannot be used as the basis for a conviction under federal fraud statutes. Louis Ciminelli was convicted of federal wire fraud for his involvement in a scheme to rig the bid process for state-funded development projects under Governor Andrew Cuomo. The Government relied on the right-to-control theory, which establishes wire fraud by depriving a victim of potentially valuable economic information. The conviction turned on whether the Second Circuit's established "righto-to-control" theory is sufficient to establish federal wire fraud. The...
2023-05-1507 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Percoco v. United States (Jury Instructions)Send us a textIn Percoco v. United States, the Supreme Court considered whether a private citizen with influence over government decision-making can be convicted for wire fraud on the theory that he or she deprived the public of its “intangible right of honest services.” Joseph Percoco, former Executive Deputy Secretary to New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, was charged with conspiracy to commit honest-services wire fraud. Percoco accepted payments while on hiatus from government service to assist a real-estate development company (while he was running Governor Cuomo's re-election campaign for eight months). The trial court instructed the jury based on th...
2023-05-1509 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Ciminelli v. United States (Wire Fraud)Send a textIn Ciminelli v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Circuit's right-to-control theory of wire fraud cannot be used as the basis for a conviction under federal fraud statutes. Louis Ciminelli was convicted of federal wire fraud for his involvement in a scheme to rig the bid process for state-funded development projects under Governor Andrew Cuomo. The Government relied on the right-to-control theory, which establishes wire fraud by depriving a victim of potentially valuable economic information. The conviction turned on whether the Second Circuit's established "righto-to-control" theory is sufficient to establish federal...
2023-05-1507 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Percoco v. United States (Jury Instructions)Send a textIn Percoco v. United States, the Supreme Court considered whether a private citizen with influence over government decision-making can be convicted for wire fraud on the theory that he or she deprived the public of its “intangible right of honest services.” Joseph Percoco, former Executive Deputy Secretary to New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, was charged with conspiracy to commit honest-services wire fraud. Percoco accepted payments while on hiatus from government service to assist a real-estate development company (while he was running Governor Cuomo's re-election campaign for eight months). The trial court instructed the j...
2023-05-1509 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Santos-Zacaria v. Garland (Immigration / Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies)Send us a textIn Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, the Supreme Court reviewed two questions. First, whether §1252(d)(1) is jurisdictional; and second, whether a non-citizen is required to request reconsideration of an adverse board action to fully exhaust administrative remedies under the law. HELD: Santos-Zacaria is correct and the Fifth Circuit was incorrect to find that §1252(d)(1) is jurisdictional. The statute in question is not jurisdictional, as Congress did not clearly demonstrate that it intended to make the statute jurisdictional. Second, the law does not require non-citizens to request discretionary forms of review, such as asking a Board to reconsider it...
2023-05-1408 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Santos-Zacaria v. Garland (Immigration / Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies)Send a textIn Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, the Supreme Court reviewed two questions. First, whether §1252(d)(1) is jurisdictional; and second, whether a non-citizen is required to request reconsideration of an adverse board action to fully exhaust administrative remedies under the law. HELD: Santos-Zacaria is correct and the Fifth Circuit was incorrect to find that §1252(d)(1) is jurisdictional. The statute in question is not jurisdictional, as Congress did not clearly demonstrate that it intended to make the statute jurisdictional. Second, the law does not require non-citizens to request discretionary forms of review, such as asking a Bo...
2023-05-1408 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Bittner v. United States (Bank Secrecy Act)Send us a textBittner, was required to file reports under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). In 2004, Congress amended the law to create a penalty for the non-willful failure to file certain reports pertaining to foreign bank accounts. After filing reports, Bittner was assessed penalties for over fifty accounts that he had failed to report over several years. The Secretary of the Treasury assessed a penalty for his non-willful failure to file in the amount of $10,000 per account per year, while Bittner claimed the amount should be $10,000 per annual report. Bittner was assessed a penalty of $2.7 million. The Fifth Circuit ruled...
2023-04-2711 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Bartenwerfer v. Buckley (Bankruptcy)Send us a textIn Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, the Supreme Court held that the discharge exceptions under Section 523(a)(2)(a) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code apply to an individual debtor, regardless of said debtor's culpability in the fraud. Recorded by Jake Leahy. Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
2023-04-2707 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Bartenwerfer v. Buckley (Bankruptcy)Send a textIn Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, the Supreme Court held that the discharge exceptions under Section 523(a)(2)(a) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code apply to an individual debtor, regardless of said debtor's culpability in the fraud. Recorded by Jake Leahy. Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
2023-04-2707 minSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)Bittner v. United States (Bank Secrecy Act)Send a textBittner, was required to file reports under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). In 2004, Congress amended the law to create a penalty for the non-willful failure to file certain reports pertaining to foreign bank accounts. After filing reports, Bittner was assessed penalties for over fifty accounts that he had failed to report over several years. The Secretary of the Treasury assessed a penalty for his non-willful failure to file in the amount of $10,000 per account per year, while Bittner claimed the amount should be $10,000 per annual report. Bittner was assessed a penalty of $2.7 million. The...
2023-04-2711 min
A Big Sur Podcast# 22 A chat with neighbors Jake, Katie Rose, and Tristian about the newly reborn BIG SUR OPEN MIC!Send a textTogether, Jake, Katie, Tristan and Magnus, at the Henry Miller Library, talking about music, the beauty of music, and how it can make community thrive. We speak about the newly reborn OPEN MIC at MILLER'S! Share this: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1726307/10371519>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Email us: hmlib@henrymiller.org with suggestions and/or comments.Support Our Podcast>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Music clips from recent Open mic's include:Tristan PetersenJake PadorrKatie RoseSarah CheungR...
2022-04-0451 min
The Association PodcastLeadership and Micro-credential Education with Dr. Jason LeahyWe are thrilled to welcome Dr. Jason Leahy, Executive Director of the Illinois Principals Association, onto The Association Podcast. It's an interesting time to be in the field of education, and we get to hear all about that and also get into some of the really cool things that he's doing at IPA to educate their members, like exploring micro-credentialing and other ways they help members and potential members advance their careers as educators. We also talk quite a bit about leadership and things he does to set the association up to thrive many years into the future.
2022-02-221h 02
Know Stroke PodcastInterview with Kaitlyn Jones OT Program Manager with XBOX Gaming Accessibility TeamChime In, Send Us a Text Message!Know Stroke Podcast Season 2 Episode 6Welcome back to the Know Stroke Podcast! Our guest today is Kaitlyn Jones. Kaitlyn is an occupational therapist and currently a Program Manager working with the XBOX Gaming Accessibility Team where she is able to use her clinical background and perspectives to help guide inclusive product design. She is very passionate about the ways in which technology that is accessible can enhance the quality of life of all people. She has done extensive research exploring the benefits of video game play that extend beyond fun and...
2021-11-2156 min
Talk of ShameEpisode #43 - WWE Legend -Jake 'The Snake' RobertsIn episode #43 of Talk of Shame Podcast, Barry-John speaks with WWE legend and Hall of Famer, Jake 'The Snake' Roberts about his abusive and troublesome upbringing and some of his most famous moments in wrestling.Jake opens up about how he was sexually abused by his mother and finding out later in life that his father was sexually abused by his father. The wrestling legend's life has been littered with tragedy, abuse and struggle in one way pr another and Jake also speaks about his late sisters suspected kidnapping and murder.All...
2020-11-1600 min
The Leadership Lounge PodcastEpisode 29 – Professor Damian Hughes - Academic background within elite sport and coachingThis week’s Episode –
I had the honour and pleasure of welcoming Domain Hughes on to the podcast this week, you will be able to tell by his bio below why I was so excited for this episode.
Professor Damian Hughes is an international speaker and bestselling author who combines his practical and academic background within sport, organisational development and change psychology, to help organisations and teams to create a high performing culture.
He is the author of eight best-selling business books, including Liquid Thinking, Liquid Leadership, How to Change Absolutely Anything, How to T...
2020-11-1123 minTalk of ShameEpisode #39 WWE Hall of Famer, Diamond Dallas PageIn this weeks episode Barry-John speaks to WWE Hall of Famer, Diamond Dallas Page about his wrestling career, DDP Yoga and the good, the bad and the ugly of the wrestling industry.DDP talk about helping his close friends Jake 'The Snake' Roberts and Scott Hall (Razor Ramon) to overcome their physical and addiction issues with his amazing DDP Yoga which ultimately led both men to sobriety and physical improvements that have to be seen to be believed.Barry-John also asks DDP about so many wrestlers dying way before their times, brain injuries and the...
2020-10-0600 min
After Work DrinksAWD Dinner Parties: PJ, Jess and JakeHello and welcome to a very special new COVID-inspired spin-off series: After Work Drinks Dinner Parties. We're turning our weekly wine-induced Zoom calls with an array of hilarious and funny friends from around the world into a handful of extra bonus podcasts for you all. For our debut ep, we have Polly 'PJ' Harding - radio host extraordinaire and friend of Izzy's from way back; Jessica Vander Leahy - columnist, model, influencer/generally extraordinary human who we were lucky enough to share an office with; and Jake Halpin, social media strategist to fashion's biggest names and our favourite man...
2020-04-111h 28
Stephano Rossi In The MixHouse Rules Vol.7-2019-Mixed By Stephano Rossi-ADE EDITIONTRACKLIST:
Espen Kraft - The Golden Boy
Jay Aliyev - Everyday (Original Mix)
LVNDSCAPE - What Id Give
Dj Iljano - Deep Night (Original Mix)
Coffee Face Feat. SevenEver - My Way (Andrey Kravtsov Remix)
Anton Ishutin - Your Love (Original Mix)
Kvinn - Love Spell (Original Mix)
Furkan Sert - Turkey Bass (Original Mix)
ReMan - Special Moments (Original Mix)
Mag Revans - Extase (Original Mix)
Nando Fortunato - Romance
Dave Andres - El Profesor (Original Mix)
Housenick - Be The One (Bruno Motta Remix)
2019-10-153h 04
Kitchen Party CeilidhKPC 2019 03 03 PodcastOur 293rd episode, which aired on March 3, 2019.
Liz Carroll & Jake Charron – Heath & Bernie’s/Half Day Road/Tune for Jim DeWan, Half Day Road
Buddy MacDonald & John Ferguson – Nancy Whiskey, Getting Dark Again
Connla – Forty Pound Jeans, River Waiting
Screaming Orphans – Lonely Boy, Lonely Boy
Paddy Glackin – John Stewart’s/James Byrne’s/Pretty Peg/Miss Patterson’s Slipper, In Full Spate
Breabach – Frenzy of the Meeting, Frenzy of the Meeting
Natalie MacMaster & Donnell Leahy – Wedding Day Jig, One
Joe Burke, Michael Cooney & Terry Corcoran – The Maid on the Mountain, Happy to Meet Sorry to Part
Claudine Langille – Da Full Rigged Ship/Farewell to No...
2019-03-1058 min