Shows
Supreme Court Oral Arguments[23-3] Coinbase, Inc. v. SuskiCoinbase, Inc. v. Suski
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 28, 2024.
Petitioner: David Suski, et al.Respondent: Coinbase, Inc.
Advocates: Jessica L. Ellsworth (for the Petitioner)
David J. Harris (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In June 2021, Coinbase, an online cryptocurrency exchange, launched a Dogecoin Sweepstakes that required participants to opt into "Official Rules" with a forum selection clause stipulating exclusive jurisdiction of California courts for related disputes. Respondent David Suski and three other users, who had agreed to the “Coin...
2024-02-2842 minSupreme Court Oral Arguments[22-976] Garland v. CargillGarland v. Cargill
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 28, 2024.
Petitioner: Michael Cargill.Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al.
Advocates: Brian H. Fletcher (for the Petitioners)
Jonathan F. Mitchell (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
For over a decade, the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”) maintained that bump stocks were not machineguns as defined by statute, 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b), and issued interpretation letters confirming this position. Following the October 1, 2017 Las Vegas shooting, where a...
2024-02-281h 30Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-529] Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A.Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 27, 2024.
Petitioner: Alex Cantero, et al.Respondent: Bank of America, N.A.
Advocates: Jonathan E. Taylor (for the Petitioners)
Malcolm L. Stewart (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting vacatur)
Lisa S. Blatt (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The National Bank Act of 1864 (NBA) established a dual banking system in the United States, allowing both federal and state governments to charter and regulate banks. National ba...
2024-02-271h 47Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-7386] McIntosh v. United StatesMcIntosh v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 27, 2024.
Petitioner: Louis McIntosh.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Steven Y. Yurowitz (for the Petitioner)
Matthew Guarnieri (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
On August 22, 2013, a jury convicted Louis McIntosh of multiple Hobbs Act robbery-related offenses and gun charges, leading to a near-life sentence of 720 months. The district court granted some relief by vacating specific counts but imposed a forfeiture amount inconsistently between oral and written judgments. On appeal, th...
2024-02-2748 minSupreme Court Oral Arguments[22-555] NetChoice, LLC v. PaxtonNetChoice, LLC v. Paxton
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 26, 2024.
Petitioner: NetChoice, LLC, et al.Respondent: Ken Paxton, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of Texas.
Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioners)
Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Aaron L. Nielson (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The State of Texas enacted HB 20 to regulate large social media platforms, such as Facebook, X (formerly known as Twitter), and YouTube. The...
2024-02-261h 20Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-277] Moody v. NetChoice, LLCMoody v. NetChoice, LLC
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 26, 2024.
Petitioner: Attorney General, State of Florida, et al.Respondent: NetChoice, LLC, et al.
Advocates: Henry C. Whitaker (for the Petitioners)
Paul D. Clement (for the Respondents)
Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Social-media platforms collect third-party posts, including text, photos, and videos, and distribute them to other users. Importantly, they are private enterprises, not governmental entities, and thus are...
2024-02-262h 22Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-1078] Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. NealyWarner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 21, 2024.
Petitioner: Warner Chappell Music, Inc., et al.Respondent: Sherman Nealy, et al.
Advocates: Kannon K. Shanmugam (for the Petitioners)
Joe Wesley Earnhardt (for the Respondents)
Yaira Dubin (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In the early 1980s, Sherman Nealy and Tony Butler formed Music Specialist, Inc. (MSI), a Florida corporation involved in the music industry. Nealy, a newcomer to the se...
2024-02-2153 minSupreme Court Oral Arguments[23A349] Ohio v. Environmental Protection AgencyOhio v. Environmental Protection Agency
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 21, 2024.
Petitioner: Ohio, et al.Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Advocates: Mathura J. Sridharan (for the State Applicants)
Catherine E. Stetson (for the Industry Applicants)
Malcolm L. Stewart (for the Federal Respondents)
Judith N. Vale (for the State Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
None
Question
None
2024-02-211h 29Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-1008] Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemCorner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 20, 2024.
Petitioner: Corner Post, Inc.Respondent: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Advocates: Bryan K. Weir (for the Petitioner)
Benjamin W. Snyder (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The case concerns the interchange fees associated with debit card transactions, which generate billions of dollars in revenue for issuing banks. The regulatory agency, the Board of the Federal Reserve System, pro...
2024-02-201h 10Supreme Court Oral Arguments[23-51] Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLCBissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 20, 2024.
Petitioner: Neal Bissonnette, et al.Respondent: LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC, et al.
Advocates: Jennifer D. Bennett (for the Petitioners)
Traci L. Lovitt (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Flowers Foods, Inc. is a holding company that owns subsidiaries responsible for producing and distributing baked goods like breads, buns, rolls, and snack cakes. Two of the independent distributors for Flowers in Connecticut are Neal Bissonnette and Ty...
2024-02-201h 00Supreme Court Oral Arguments[23-719] Trump v. AndersonTrump v. Anderson
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 8, 2024.
Petitioner: Donald J. Trump.Respondent: Norma Anderson, et al.
Advocates: Jonathan F. Mitchell (for the Petitioner)
Jason C. Murray (for Respondents Anderson, et al.)
Shannon W. Stevenson (for Respondent Griswold)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Donald Trump was elected as the 45th President, serving for four years. In the 2020 election, Joe Biden was elected as the 46th President, despite Trump's refusal to accept the results. The...
2024-02-082h 09Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-1219] Relentless, Inc. v. Department of CommerceRelentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 17, 2024.
Petitioner: Relentless, Inc., et al.Respondent: Department of Commerce, et al.
Advocates: Roman Martinez (for the Petitioners)
Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The Atlantic herring fishery is regulated by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), aimed at preventing overfishing and promoting conservation. The MSA sets up regional councils, including the New England Fishery Management Council, which oversees the Atlantic herring fis...
2024-01-172h 11Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-451] Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoLoper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 17, 2024.
Petitioner: Loper Bright Enterprises, et al.Respondent: Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al.
Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioners)
Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
A group of commercial fishermen who regularly participate in the Atlantic herring fishery sued the National Marine Fisheries Service after the Service promulgated a rule that required industry to fund at-sea monitoring programs at an estimated cost of...
2024-01-171h 16Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-1165] Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P.Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 16, 2024.
Petitioner: Macquarie Infrastructure Corp., et al.Respondent: Moab Partners, L.P., et al.
Advocates: Linda T. Coberly (for the Petitioners)
David C. Frederick (for the Respondent)
Ephraim McDowell (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
For years, Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. had been lauded as a “total return opportunity” thanks to its strong dividend history, diversified business operations, and favorable growth rates...
2024-01-161h 05Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-913] Devillier v. TexasDevillier v. Texas
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 16, 2024.
Petitioner: Richard Devillier.Respondent: State of Texas.
Advocates: Robert J. McNamara (for the Petitioners)
Aaron L. Nielson (for the Respondent)
Edwin S. Kneedler (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Petitioners Devillier and others own property in Texas along Interstate Highway 10 (IH-10). The State of Texas, through the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), elevated IH-10 and installed a solid concrete median barrier, which acted as...
2024-01-161h 11Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-899] Smith v. ArizonaSmith v. Arizona
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 10, 2024.
Petitioner: Jason Smith.Respondent: State of Arizona.
Advocates: Hari Santhanam (for the Petitioner)
Eric J. Feigin (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
Alexander W. Samuels (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In December 2019, law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at Jason Smith's father's property, which had multiple structures. They detected a strong odor of marijuana from a shed, where they found Smith and later discovered va...
2024-01-101h 28Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-1074] Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, CaliforniaSheetz v. County of El Dorado, California
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 9, 2024.
Petitioner: George Sheetz.Respondent: County of El Dorado, California.
Advocates: Paul J. Beard II (for the Petitioner)
Aileen M. McGrath (for the Respondent)
Erica L. Ross (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The County of El Dorado, California, has a Traffic Impact Mitigation (TIM) Fee Program that imposes a traffic-impact fee on any property owner applying for a building pe...
2024-01-091h 28Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-1238] Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLCOffice of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 9, 2024.
Petitioner: Office of the United States Trustee.Respondent: John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC, et al.
Advocates: Masha G. Hansford (for the Petitioner)
Daniel L. Geyser (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In the U.S., bankruptcy proceedings are administered through two systems: the Trustee Program managed by the Department of Justice for 88 judicial districts, and the Bankruptcy Administrator Program for six...
2024-01-091h 02Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-674] Campos-Chaves v. GarlandCampos-Chaves v. Garland
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 8, 2024.
Petitioner: Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves.Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General.
Advocates: Charles L. McCloud (for the United States)
Easha Anand (for the Petitioner in 22-674 and the Respondent in 22-884)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Moris Campos-Chaves, a native and citizen of El Salvador, entered the United States illegally on January 24, 2005, and was served with a Notice to Appear (NTA) on February 10, 2005. He was charged as removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6...
2024-01-081h 40Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-1178] Federal Bureau of Investigation v. FikreFederal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 8, 2024.
Petitioner: Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al.Respondent: Yonas Fikre.
Advocates: Sopan Joshi (for the Petitioners)
Gadeir Abbas (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2010, Yonas Fikre, a U.S. citizen of Eritrean descent, was placed on the FBI’s No Fly List while he was traveling to Sudan. FBI agents questioned him about his ties to a mosque in Portland, Oregon, and informed him he was a...
2024-01-081h 21Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-193] Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, MissouriMuldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 6, 2023.
Petitioner: Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow.Respondent: City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al.
Advocates: Brian Wolfman (for the Petitioner)
Aimee W. Brown (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Robert M. Loeb (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Sergeant Muldrow, initially assigned to the Intelligence Division where she worked on various high-profile cases and was deputized by the FBI, was transferred to the Fif...
2023-12-061h 36Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-800] Moore v. United StatesMoore v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 5, 2023.
Petitioner: Charles G. Moore and Kathleen F. Moore.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Andrew M. Grossman (for the Petitioners)
Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2005, the Moores invested $40,000 in KisanKraft, an Indian company that supplies tools to small farmers, in exchange for 11% of the common shares. KisanKraft is a Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC), meaning it is majority-owned by U.S. persons but operates abr...
2023-12-052h 04Supreme Court Oral Arguments[23-124] Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 4, 2023.
Petitioner: William K. Harrington, United States Trustee, Region 2.Respondent: Purdue Pharma L.P., et al.
Advocates: Curtis E. Gannon (for the Petitioner)
Gregory G. Garre (for Respondents Purdue Pharma L.P., et al.)
Pratik A. Shah (for Respondents The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al.)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The Sackler family, who purchased Purdue Pharma in the 1950s, heavily influenced the...
2023-12-041h 43Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-859] Securities and Exchange Commission v. JarkesySecurities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 29, 2023.
Petitioner: Securities and Exchange Commission.Respondent: George R. Jarkesy, Jr., et al.
Advocates: Brian H. Fletcher (for the Petitioner)
S. Michael McColloch (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
George Jarkesy established two hedge funds, with Patriot28 as the investment adviser, managing $24 million in assets from over 100 investors. The SEC initiated an investigation in 2011, eventually bringing an in-house action alleging fraud under multiple acts. Jarkesy challenged the SEC’s pr...
2023-11-292h 16Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-721] McElrath v. GeorgiaMcElrath v. Georgia
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 28, 2023.
Petitioner: Damian McElrath.Respondent: Georgia.
Advocates: Richard A. Simpson (for the Petitioner)
Stephen J. Petrany (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2017, a Georgia jury found Damien McElrath guilty but mentally ill as to felony murder but not guilty by reason of insanity as to malice murder after an encounter between McElrath and his mother. The trial court did not recognize the verdicts as repugnant and accepted them, but the...
2023-11-2859 minSupreme Court Oral Arguments[22-666] Wilkinson v. GarlandWilkinson v. Garland
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 28, 2023.
Petitioner: Situ Kamu Wilkinson.Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General.
Advocates: Jaime A. Santos (for the Petitioner)
Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Situ Wilkinson, originally from Trinidad and Tobago, overstayed his tourist visa in the U.S., built a life, and fathered a U.S.-citizen son. In 2019, after being arrested for selling crack cocaine, he faced deportation proceedings. Wilkinson conceded his deportability but sought ei...
2023-11-281h 30Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-6389] Brown v. United StatesBrown v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 27, 2023.
Petitioner: Justin Rashaad Brown.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Jeffrey T. Green (for the Petitioner Justin Rashaad Brown)
Andrew L. Adler (for the Petitioner Eugene Jackson)
Austin L. Raynor (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Justin Rashaad Brown was indicted in York County, Pennsylvania, for multiple counts, including being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Brown pleaded guilty to one...
2023-11-271h 24Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-888] Rudisill v. McDonoughRudisill v. McDonough
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 8, 2023.
Petitioner: James R. Rudisill.Respondent: Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
Advocates: Misha Tseytlin (for the Petitioner)
Vivek Suri (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The case involves the interpretation of education benefits under two different programs for veterans: the Montgomery GI Bill enacted in 1984 and the Post-9/11 GI Bill enacted in 2008. Both programs offer a maximum of 36 months of education benefits. Congress has implemented various provisions to limit the be...
2023-11-081h 10Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-915] United States v. RahimiUnited States v. Rahimi
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 7, 2023.
Petitioner: United States.Respondent: Zackey Rahimi.
Advocates: Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Petitioner)
J. Matthew Wright (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Between December 2020 and January 2021, Zackey Rahimi was involved in a series of violent incidents in Arlington, Texas, including multiple shootings and a hit-and-run. Rahimi was under a civil protective order for alleged assault against his ex-girlfriend, which explicitly prohibited him from possessing firearms. Police searched his hom...
2023-11-071h 32Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-846] Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. KirtzDepartment of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 6, 2023.
Petitioner: Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service.Respondent: Reginald Kirtz.
Advocates: Benjamin W. Snyder (for the Petitioner)
Nandan M. Joshi (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 1970, Congress enacted the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to regulate credit reporting and protect consumer privacy. The Act was amended in 1996 to impose additional obligations on entities like creditors and lenders that furnish inf...
2023-11-061h 18Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-704] Vidal v. ElsterVidal v. Elster
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 1, 2023.
Petitioner: Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office.Respondent: Steve Elster.
Advocates: Malcolm L. Stewart (for the Petitioner)
Jonathan E. Taylor (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2018, Steve Elster attempted to register the phrase “TRUMP TOO SMALL” for use on various types of shirts, intending the mark to serve as political commentary on President Donald Trump and his pol...
2023-11-011h 15Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-324] O'Connor-Ratcliff v. GarnierO'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 31, 2023.
Petitioner: Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff, et al.Respondent: Christopher Garnier, et ux.
Advocates: Hashim M. Mooppan (for the Petitioners)
Sopan Joshi (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Pamela S. Karlan (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Petitioners Christopher and Kimberly Garnier are parents of children in the Poway Unified School District in the city of Poway, California, just north of San Diego. The Garniers frequently posted comme...
2023-10-311h 40Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-611] Lindke v. FreedLindke v. Freed
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 31, 2023.
Petitioner: Kevin Lindke.Respondent: James R. Freed.
Advocates: Allon Kedem (for the Petitioner)
Victoria R. Ferres (for the Respondent)
Masha G. Hansford (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
James Freed created a private Facebook profile that was originally intended to connect with family and friends. Eventually, he grew too popular for Facebook's 5,000-friend limit on profiles. So Freed converted his profile to a "...
2023-10-311h 17Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-585] Culley v. MarshallCulley v. Marshall
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 30, 2023.
Petitioner: Halima Tariffa Culley, et al.Respondent: Steven T. Marshall, Attorney General of Alabama, et al.
Advocates: Shay Dvoretzky (for the Petitioners)
Edmund G. LaCour, Jr. (for the Respondents)
Nicole F. Reaves (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
On February 17, 2019, Halima Tariffa Culley’s son was pulled over by police while driving a car registered to his mother. Police arrested him, charged him w...
2023-10-301h 39Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-807] Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACPAlexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 11, 2023.
Appellant: Thomas C. Alexander, in His Official Capacity as President of the South Carolina Senate, et al..Appellee: The South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, et al..
Advocates: John M. Gore (for the Appellants)
Leah C. Aden (for the Appellees)
Caroline A. Flynn (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
After the 2020 Census, South Carolina’s Republican-controlled legi...
2023-10-112h 05Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-660] Murray v. UBS Securities, LLCMurray v. UBS Securities, LLC
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 10, 2023.
Petitioner: Trevor Murray.Respondent: UBS Securities, LLC, et al..
Advocates: Easha Anand (for the Petitioner)
Anthony A. Yang (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Eugene Scalia (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2011, UBS hired Trevor Murray as a strategist in its commercial mortgage-backed securities business. Under Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, Murray was required to certify that his reports were produced independently and...
2023-10-101h 28Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-500] Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLCGreat Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 10, 2023.
Petitioner: Great Lakes Insurance SE.Respondent: Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC.
Advocates: Jeffrey B. Wall (for the Petitioner)
Howard J. Bashman (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Raiders Retreat Realty Co., a Pennsylvania company, insured a yacht for up to $550,000 with Great Lakes Insurance (GLI), a company headquartered in the United Kingdom. In June 2019, the yacht ran aground, incurring at least $300,000 in dam...
2023-10-101h 10Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-429] Acheson Hotels, LLC v. LauferAcheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 4, 2023.
Petitioner: Acheson Hotels, LLC.Respondent: Deborah Laufer.
Advocates: Adam G. Unikowsky (for the Petitioner)
Erica L. Ross (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
Kelsi B. Corkran (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Deborah Laufer, a prolific litigant with physical disabilities and vision impairments, sued Acheson Hotels for failing to publish information about their accessibility on their website, which is required under the Americans wit...
2023-10-041h 24Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-448] Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of AmericaConsumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 3, 2023.
Petitioner: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, et al..Respondent: Community Financial Services Association of America, Limited, et al..
Advocates: Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Petitioners)
Noel J. Francisco (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In response to the financial crisis around 2007, Congress passed the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which, among other things, authorized the creation of the Consu...
2023-10-031h 34Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-340] Pulsifer v. United StatesPulsifer v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 2, 2023.
Petitioner: Mark E. Pulsifer.Respondent: United States.
Advocates: Shay Dvoretzky (for the Petitioner)
Frederick Liu (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Mark Pulsifer pleaded guilty to distributing at least fifty grams of methamphetamine. Relying on 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f), Pulsifer asked the district court for a sentence lower than the otherwise applicable statutory minimum term of imprisonment. That provision, permits a district court to impose a sentence lower than...
2023-10-021h 40Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-166] Tyler v. Hennepin County, MinnesotaTyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 26, 2023.Decided on May 25, 2023.
Petitioner: Geraldine Tyler.Respondent: Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al..
Advocates: Christina M. Martin (for the Petitioner)
Erica L. Ross (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
Neal Kumar Katyal (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Geraldine Tyler owned a condominium in Minneapolis. She stopped paying her property taxes and accrued a tax debt of $15,000. To satisfy the debt, Hen...
2023-04-261h 40Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-381] Yegiazaryan v. SmaginYegiazaryan v. Smagin
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 25, 2023.Decided on Jun 22, 2023.
Petitioner: Ashot Yegiazaryan.Respondent: Vitaly I. Smagin, et al. .
Advocates: Vincent Levy (for the Petitioners)
Nicholas O. Kennedy (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Vitaly Smagin, a Russian citizen who resides in Russia, sued Ashot Yegiazaryan, a Russian citizen who resides in California, and eleven other defendants, under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Smagin alleged that Yegiazaryan and the other def...
2023-04-251h 04Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-210] Dupree v. YoungerDupree v. Younger
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 24, 2023.Decided on May 25, 2023.
Petitioner: Neil Dupree.Respondent: Kevin Younger.
Advocates: Andrew T. Tutt (for the Petitioner)
Amy M. Saharia (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Kevin Younger was a pretrial detainee at a state prison in Baltimore, Maryland. One morning, three guards attacked Younger and other inmates at the direction of Neil Dupree, an intelligence lieutenant at the prison. Younger sued Dupree under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming tha...
2023-04-2458 minSupreme Court Oral Arguments[22-227] Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. CoughlinLac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 24, 2023.Decided on Jun 15, 2023.
Petitioner: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, et al..Respondent: Brian W. Coughlin.
Advocates: Pratik A. Shah (for the Petitioners)
Gregory G. Rapawy (for the Respondent)
Austin L. Raynor (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In July 2019, Brian W. Coughlin took out a $1,100 payday loan from Le...
2023-04-2458 minSupreme Court Oral Arguments[22-138] Counterman v. ColoradoCounterman v. Colorado
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 19, 2023.Decided on Jun 27, 2023.
Petitioner: Billy Raymond Counterman.Respondent: The People of the State of Colorado.
Advocates: John P. Elwood (for the Petitioner)
Philip J. Weiser (for the Respondent)
Eric J. Feigin (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Billy Raymond Counterman repeatedly contacted a person over Facebook in 2014, sending her “creepy” messages from numerous different accounts even after she repeatedly blocked...
2023-04-191h 46Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1326] U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc.U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc.
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 18, 2023.Decided on Jun 1, 2023.
Petitioner: Unites States of America, Ex. Rel. Schutte, et al..Respondent: SuperValu Inc., et al..
Advocates: Tejinder Singh (for the Petitioners)
Malcolm L. Stewart (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Carter G. Phillips (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
SuperValu owned or operated approximately 2,500 grocery stories with over 800 in-store pharmacies between 2006 and 2016. To compete with ot...
2023-04-181h 12Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-174] Groff v. DeJoyGroff v. DeJoy
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 18, 2023.Decided on Jun 29, 2023.
Petitioner: Gerald E. Groff.Respondent: Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General.
Advocates: Aaron M. Streett (for the Petitioner)
Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Gerald Groff is a Christian and U.S. Postal Service worker. He refused to work on Sundays due to his religious beliefs. USPS offered to find employees to swap shifts with him, but on numerous occasions, no co-worker wou...
2023-04-181h 47Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-200] Slack Technologies v. PiraniSlack Technologies v. Pirani
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 17, 2023.Decided on Jun 1, 2023.
Petitioner: Slack Technologies, LLC, fka Slack Technologies, Inc., et al..Respondent: Fiyyaz Pirani.
Advocates: Thomas G. Hungar (for the Petitioners)
Kevin K. Russell (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
On June 20, 2019, tech company Slack went public through a direct listing, which, unlike an initial public offering (IPO), does not involve the company issuing new shares and instead involves only filing a registration statement to...
2023-04-171h 10Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-23] Pugin v. GarlandPugin v. Garland
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 17, 2023.Decided on Jun 22, 2023.
Petitioner: Jean Francois Pugin.Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General.
Advocates: Curtis E. Gannon (for Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General)
Martha Hutton (for the Petitioner in 22-23 (Pugin))
Mark C. Fleming (for the Respondent in 22-331 (Cordero-Garcia))
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Jean Francois Pugin is a citizen of Mauritius who has lived in the United States as a lawful permanent resident for nearly 40 years. The go...
2023-04-171h 39Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1599] Polselli v. Internal Revenue ServicePolselli v. Internal Revenue Service
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 29, 2023.Decided on May 18, 2023.
Petitioner: Hanna Karcho Polselli, et al..Respondent: Internal Revenue Service.
Advocates: Shay Dvoretzky (for the Petitioners)
Ephraim McDowell (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Remo Polselli underpaid his federal taxes for over a decade, with an outstanding balance of over $2 million. In pursuit of those unpaid liabilities, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued administrative summonses to the banks of Polselli’s wife and...
2023-03-2950 minSupreme Court Oral Arguments[22-196] Samia v. United StatesSamia v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 29, 2023.Decided on Jun 23, 2023.
Petitioner: Adam Samia, aka Sal, aka Adam Samic.Respondent: United States.
Advocates: Kannon K. Shanmugam (for the Petitioner)
Caroline A. Flynn (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Defendants Joseph Manuel Hunter, Carl David Stillwell, and Adam Samia were tried jointly and convicted on five counts: conspiracy to commit murder-for-hire, murder-for-hire, conspiracy to murder and kidnap in a foreign country, causing death with a f...
2023-03-291h 38Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1576] Smith v. United StatesSmith v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 28, 2023.Decided on Jun 15, 2023.
Petitioner: Timothy J. Smith.Respondent: United States.
Advocates: Samir Deger-Sen (for the Petitioner)
Sopan Joshi (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Timothy Smith is a software engineer who lives in Mobile, Alabama, and who is an avid fisherman. He used a web application called Fiddler to obtain the coordinates of private artificial reefs from a website, StrikeLines, that sells such coordinates for bet...
2023-03-281h 16Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-49] Lora v. United StatesLora v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 28, 2023.Decided on Jun 16, 2023.
Petitioner: Efrain Lora.Respondent: United States.
Advocates: Lawrence D. Rosenberg (for the Petitioner)
Erica L. Ross (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Efrain Lora and three co-defendants ran an operation selling cocaine and cocaine base in the Bronx. Lora and the others allegedly conspired to murder a rival drug dealer in retaliation for threats the rival had made over drug territory.
A...
2023-03-281h 01Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-757] Amgen Inc. v. SanofiAmgen Inc. v. Sanofi
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 27, 2023.Decided on May 18, 2023.
Petitioner: Amgen, Inc., et al..Respondent: Sanofi, et al..
Advocates: Jeffrey A. Lamken (for the Petitioners)
Paul D. Clement (for the Respondents)
Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Amgen owns two patents that describe cholesterol-lowering drugs that share a common written description. In 2014, Amgen filed suit against Sanofi alleging infringement of multiple pa...
2023-03-271h 39Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-179] United States v. HansenUnited States v. Hansen
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 27, 2023.Decided on Jun 23, 2023.
Petitioner: United States.Respondent: Helaman Hansen.
Advocates: Brian H. Fletcher (for the Petitioner)
Esha Bhandari (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Helaman Hansen ran an immigration-advising service charging undocumented immigrants for (incorrect) advice on how to achieve U.S. citizenship. Hansen was convicted and sentenced for, among other federal crimes, two counts of encouraging or inducing illegal immigration for private financial gain, in...
2023-03-271h 22Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-148] Jack Daniel's Properties v. VIP Products LLCJack Daniel's Properties v. VIP Products LLC
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 22, 2023.Decided on Jun 8, 2023.
Petitioner: Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc..Respondent: VIP Products LLC.
Advocates: Lisa S. Blatt (for the Petitioner)
Matthew Guarnieri (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Bennett E. Cooper (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
VIP Products LLC, a company that manufactures dog toys, created a plastic toy that resembles Jack Daniel’s iconic bottle. Instead of “Jack Daniel...
2023-03-221h 23Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1043] Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 21, 2023.Decided on Jun 29, 2023.
Petitioner: Abitron Austria GmbH, et al..Respondent: Hetronic International, Inc..
Advocates: Lucas M. Walker (for the Petitioners)
Masha G. Hansford (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
Matthew S. Hellman (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Hetronic International, Inc., a U.S. company, manufactures radio remote controls heavy-duty construction equipment. By agreement, Abitron, a foreign corporation, dis...
2023-03-211h 27Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-105] Coinbase v. BielskiCoinbase v. Bielski
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 21, 2023.Decided on Jun 23, 2023.
Petitioner: Coinbase, Inc..Respondent: Abraham Bielski.
Advocates: Neal Kumar Katyal (for the Petitioner)
Hassan A. Zavareei (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Coinbase operates an online currency and crypto-currency exchange platform. Abraham Bielski created a Coinbase account in 2021, and shortly after opening it, he alleges that a scammer fraudulently accessed his account and stole more than $30,000 from him. Bielski alleged that Coinbase ignored his at...
2023-03-211h 22Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1484] Arizona v. Navajo NationArizona v. Navajo Nation
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 20, 2023.Decided on Jun 22, 2023.
Petitioner: State of Arizona, et al..Respondent: Navajo Nation, et al..
Advocates: Frederick Liu (On behalf of the Federal parties)
Rita P. Maguire (On behalf of the State parties)
Shay Dvoretzky (On behalf of the Navajo Nation)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The Navajo Reservation is the “permanent home” of the Navajo Nation, under the 1868 Treaty, and subsequent expansions by executive orders and acts of Cong...
2023-03-201h 50Supreme Court Oral Arguments[156-orig] New York v. New JerseyNew York v. New Jersey
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 1, 2023.Decided on Apr 18, 2023.
Petitioner: New York.Respondent: New Jersey.
Advocates: Judith N. Vale (for New York)
Jeremy M. Feigenbaum (for New Jersey)
Austin L. Raynor (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting New Jersey)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
New York and New Jersey entered into an interstate compact called the Waterfront Commission Compact to fight corruption in the Port of New York and New Jer...
2023-03-011h 28Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-506] Biden v. NebraskaBiden v. Nebraska
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 28, 2023.Decided on Jun 30, 2023.
Petitioner: Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, et al..Respondent: Nebraska, et al..
Advocates: Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Petitioners)
James A. Campbell (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2020, then-presidential candidate Joseph Biden promised to cancel up to $10,000 of federal student loan debt per borrower. After winning the election, the Biden administration announced its intent to forgive, via executive action, $10,000 in...
2023-02-282h 02Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-535] Department of Education v. BrownDepartment of Education v. Brown
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 28, 2023.Decided on Jun 30, 2023.
Petitioner: United States Department of Education, et al..Respondent: Mayra Brown, et al..
Advocates: Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Petitioners)
J. Michael Connolly (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Fulfilling one of then-presidential candidate Joseph Biden’s campaign promises, the Secretary of Education invoked its authority under the HEROES Act to create a loan forgiveness program in response to the COVID-19 pande...
2023-02-281h 15Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-10] Dubin v. United StatesDubin v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 27, 2023.Decided on Jun 8, 2023.
Petitioner: David Fox Dubin.Respondent: United States.
Advocates: Jeffrey L. Fisher (for the Petitioner)
Vivek Suri (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
William Joseph Dubin was a licensed psychologist in Texas and ran a psychology practice called “Psychological A.R.T.S., P.C.” (PARTS). His son, David Dubin, worked for PARTS in a business capacity. PARTS was an enrolled Medicaid provider, which m...
2023-02-271h 32Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1496] Twitter, Inc. v. TaamnehTwitter, Inc. v. Taamneh
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 22, 2023.Decided on May 18, 2023.
Petitioner: Twitter, Inc., et al..Respondent: Mehier Taamneh, et al..
Advocates: Seth P. Waxman (for the Petitioner)
Edwin S. Kneedler (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting reversal)
Eric Schnapper (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
This case arises from the same set of facts as Gonzalez v. Google.
Nohemi Gonzalez, a U.S. citizen, was killed by a ter...
2023-02-222h 29Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1333] Gonzalez v. Google LLCGonzalez v. Google LLC
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 21, 2023.Decided on May 18, 2023.
Petitioner: Reynaldo Gonzalez, et al..Respondent: Google LLC.
Advocates: Eric Schnapper (for the Petitioners)
Malcolm L. Stewart (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting vacatur)
Lisa S. Blatt (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
This case arises from the same set of facts as Twitter v. Taamneh.
Nohemi Gonzalez, a U.S. citizen, was killed by a terrorist attack in...
2023-02-212h 40Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-887] Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, et al.Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, et al.
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 18, 2023.Decided on Mar 21, 2023.
Petitioner: Miguel L.V. Perez.Respondent: Sturgis Public Schools, et al..
Advocates: Roman Martinez (for the Petitioner)
Anthony A. Yang (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Shay Dvoretzky (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Miguel Perez is a 23-year-old deaf student in Michigan. Although the school assigned him a classroom aide, the aide was not trained to...
2023-01-181h 28Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1436] Santos-Zacaria v. GarlandSantos-Zacaria v. Garland
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 17, 2023.Decided on May 11, 2023.
Petitioner: Leon Santos-Zacaria.Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General.
Advocates: Paul W. Hughes (for the Petitioner)
Yaira Dubin (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Santos is a native and citizen of Guatemala seeking asylum in the United States based on the likelihood of persecution due to her sexual orientation and transgender identity. An immigration judge denied her application for withholding removal, finding one prior as...
2023-01-171h 03Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1450] Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United StatesTurkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 17, 2023.Decided on Apr 19, 2023.
Petitioner: Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S..Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Lisa S. Blatt (for the Petitioner)
Eric J. Feigin (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Turkiye Halk Bankasi (“Halkbank”) is a commercial bank that is majority-owned by the Government of Turkey. A 2019 grand jury charged Halkbank with participating in a money-laundering scheme involving billions of dollars’ worth of...
2023-01-171h 35Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-96] Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc.Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc.
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 11, 2023.Decided on May 11, 2023.
Petitioner: Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico.Respondent: Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc..
Advocates: Mark D. Harris (for the Petitioner)
Aimee W. Brown (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting vacatur)
Sarah M. Harris (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The Centro de Periodismo Investigativo (“CPI”) is a nonprofit media organi...
2023-01-1156 minSupreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1449] Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersGlacier Northwest, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 10, 2023.Decided on Jun 1, 2023.
Petitioner: Glacier Northwest, Inc..Respondent: International Brotherhood of Teamsters.
Advocates: Noel J. Francisco (for the Petitioner)
Vivek Suri (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
Darin M. Dalmat (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Glacier Northwest is a Washington corporation that sells and delivers ready-mix concrete to businesses in the state. It employs approximately 80-90 truck dr...
2023-01-101h 26Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1397] In re Grand JuryIn re Grand Jury
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 9, 2023.Decided on Jan 23, 2023.
Petitioner: In re Grand Jury.
Advocates: Daniel B. Levin (for the Petitioner)
Masha G. Hansford (for the United States)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
A grand jury issued subpoenas to two parties—“Company” and “Law Firm”—requesting documents and communications related to a criminal investigation into the owner of Company and client of Law Firm. In response to the subpoenas, Company and Law Firm refused to disclose cer...
2023-01-091h 07Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1454] The Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityThe Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 9, 2023.Decided on May 18, 2023.
Petitioner: The Ohio Adjutant General’s Department, et al..Respondent: Federal Labor Relations Authority, et al..
Advocates: Benjamin M. Flowers (for the Petitioners)
Nicole F. Reaves (for the federal Respondent)
Andres M. Grajales (for the union Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2016, the Ohio National Guard and its Adjutant General (the “Guard”) decided to end its 45-year-long relationsh...
2023-01-091h 29Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1271] Moore v. HarperMoore v. Harper
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 7, 2022.Decided on Jun 27, 2023.
Petitioner: Timothy K. Moore, in His Official Capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives, et al..Respondent: Rebecca Harper, et al..
Advocates: David H. Thompson (for the Petitioners)
Neal Kumar Katyal (for the Private Respondents)
Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. (for the State Respondents)
Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
After the...
2022-12-072h 53Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-908] Bartenwerfer v. BuckleyBartenwerfer v. Buckley
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 6, 2022.Decided on Feb 22, 2023.
Petitioner: Kate M. Bartenwerfer.Respondent: Kieran Buckley.
Advocates: Sarah M. Harris (for the Petitioner)
Zachary D. Tripp (for the Respondent)
Erica L. Ross (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
David and Kate Bartenwerfer renovated a house in San Francisco, California, and sold it to Kieran Buckley. After the sale, Buckley discovered defects in the house and sue...
2022-12-061h 12Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1052] U.S., ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health ResourcesU.S., ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 6, 2022.Decided on Jun 16, 2023.
Petitioner: United States, ex rel. Jesse Polansky, M.D., M.P.H..Respondent: Executive Health Resources, Inc., et al..
Advocates: Daniel L. Geyser (for the Petitioner)
Frederick Liu (for Respondent the United States)
Mark W. Mosier (for Respondent Executive Health Resources, Inc.)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Dr. Jesse Polansky was an official at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Se...
2022-12-061h 21Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-476] 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 5, 2022.Decided on Jun 30, 2023.
Petitioner: 303 Creative LLC.Respondent: Aubrey Elenis, et al..
Advocates: Kristen Kellie Waggoner (for the Petitioners)
Eric R. Olson (for the Respondents)
Brian H. Fletcher (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Lorie Smith is the owner and founder of a graphic design firm, 303 Creative LLC. She wants to expand her business to include wedding websites. However, she...
2022-12-052h 21Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1270] MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLCMOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 5, 2022.Decided on Apr 19, 2023.
Petitioner: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC.Respondent: Transform Holdco LLC.
Advocates: Douglas Hallward-Driemeier (for the Petitioner)
Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
G. Eric Brunstad, Jr. (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Sears formerly occupied a space in the Mall of America in Minneapolis, Minnesota, under a lease with MOAC. In 2019, the ba...
2022-12-051h 09Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1164] Wilkins v. United StatesWilkins v. United States
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 30, 2022.Decided on Mar 28, 2023.
Petitioner: Larry Steven Wilkins, et al..Respondent: United States.
Advocates: Jeffrey W. McCoy (for the Petitioners)
Benjamin W. Snyder (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Robbins Gulch Road runs between Highway 93 and the Bitterroot National Forest, crossing the private properties of Larry Wilkins and Jane Stanton near Connor, Montana. The previous owners of each of their properties had granted the United States an ea...
2022-11-301h 05Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22-58] United States v. TexasUnited States v. Texas
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 29, 2022.Decided on Jun 23, 2023.
Petitioner: United States of America, et al..Respondent: State of Texas and State of Louisiana.
Advocates: Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Petitioners)
Judd E. Stone, II (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In September 2021, the Secretary of Homeland Security issued the Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law in an effort to allocate limited resources that could not feasibly deport every rem...
2022-11-292h 16Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1158] Percoco v. United StatesPercoco v. United States
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 28, 2022.Decided on May 11, 2023.
Petitioner: Joseph Percoco.Respondent: United States.
Advocates: Jacob M. Roth (for the Petitioner)
Nicole F. Reaves (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2012, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo launched an initiative, known as the “Buffalo Billion” initiative, to develop the greater Buffalo area. Alain Kaloyeros strategically secured a highly influential role in the initiative and used that role to award contracts to certain develo...
2022-11-281h 07Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1170] Ciminelli v. United StatesCiminelli v. United States
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 28, 2022.Decided on May 11, 2023.
Petitioner: Louis Ciminelli.Respondent: United States.
Advocates: Michael R. Dreeben (for the Petitioner)
Eric J. Feigin (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2012, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo launched an initiative, known as the “Buffalo Billion” initiative, to develop the greater Buffalo area. Alain Kaloyeros strategically secured a highly influential role in the initiative and used that role to award contracts to certain develo...
2022-11-281h 17Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-376] Haaland v. BrackeenHaaland v. Brackeen
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 9, 2022.
Petitioner: Deb Haaland, Secretary of the Interior, et al..Respondent: Chat Everet Brackeen.
Advocates: Matthew D. McGill (for Chad Everet Brackeen, et al.)
Judd E. Stone, II (for Texas)
Edwin S. Kneedler (for the federal parties)
Ian H. Gershengorn (for the tribal parties)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a federal law enacted in 1978, restricts the removal of Native American children from their families and establishes a p...
2022-11-093h 12Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1168] Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 8, 2022.Decided on Jun 27, 2023.
Petitioner: Robert Mallory.Respondent: Norfolk Southern Railway Co..
Advocates: Ashley C. Keller (for the Petitioner)
Carter G. Phillips (for the Respondent)
Curtis E. Gannon (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Robert Mallory sued Norfolk Southern Railway Co. in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas for claims arising under the Federal Employer’s Liabi...
2022-11-081h 48Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-806] Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. TalevskiHealth and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 8, 2022.Decided on Jun 8, 2023.
Petitioner: Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, et al..Respondent: Gorgi Talevski.
Advocates: Lawrence S. Robbins (for the Petitioners)
Thomas M. Fisher (for Indiana, et al., as amicus curiae supporting the Petitioners)
Benjamin W. Snyder (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
Andrew T. Tutt (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Gorgi Talevski was...
2022-11-081h 34Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-86] Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionAxon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 7, 2022.Decided on Apr 14, 2023.
Petitioner: Axon Enterprise, Inc..Respondent: Federal Trade Commission, et al..
Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioner)
Malcolm L. Stewart (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Axon Enterprises manufactures personal body cameras for law enforcement. In 2018, it acquired a competitor body camera company called Vievu. After the acquisition, the Federal Trade Commission informed Axon that the transaction raised antitrust con...
2022-11-071h 31Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1239] Securities and Exchange Commission v. CochranSecurities and Exchange Commission v. Cochran
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 7, 2022.Decided on Apr 14, 2023.
Petitioner: Securities and Exchange Commission, et al..Respondent: Michelle Cochran.
Advocates: Gregory G. Garre (for Michelle Cochran)
Malcolm L. Stewart (for the SEC, et al.)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In April 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought an enforcement action against Michelle Cochran, a certified public accountant, alleging that she had failed to comply with federal auditing standards. After a hearing, an...
2022-11-071h 09Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1195] Bittner v. United StatesBittner v. United States
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 2, 2022.Decided on Feb 28, 2023.
Petitioner: Alexandru Bittner.Respondent: United States.
Advocates: Daniel L. Geyser (for the Petitioner)
Matthew Guarnieri (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Alexandru Bittner erroneously failed to report his interests in foreign bank accounts on annual FBAR forms, as required by the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (BSA). The government fined him $2.72 million—$10,000 for each unreported account each year from 2007 to 2011. Bittner challenged the fine, and...
2022-11-021h 12Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-857] Jones v. HendrixJones v. Hendrix
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 1, 2022.Decided on Jun 22, 2023.
Petitioner: Marcus DeAngelo Jones.Respondent: Dewayne Hendrix.
Advocates: Daniel R. Ortiz (for the Petitioner)
Eric J. Feigin (for the Respondent, supporting affirmance)
Morgan L. Ratner (court-appointed amicus curiae, supporting the judgment below)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
A jury convicted Marcus DeAngelo Jones of one count of making false statements to acquire a firearm and two counts of possessing a firearm as a felon. Jones app...
2022-11-011h 19Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-846] Cruz v. ArizonaCruz v. Arizona
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 1, 2022.Decided on Feb 22, 2023.
Petitioner: John Montenegro Cruz.Respondent: Arizona.
Advocates: Neal Kumar Katyal (for the Petitioner)
Joseph A. Kanefield (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2005, a jury convicted John Montenegro Cruz of first-degree murder for the 2003 killing of a Tucson police officer and sentenced Cruz to death. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed Cruz’s conviction and sentence, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied his petit...
2022-11-011h 01Supreme Court Oral Arguments[20-1199] Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeStudents for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 31, 2022.
Petitioner: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc..Respondent: President & Fellows of Harvard College.
Advocates: Cameron T. Norris (for the Petitioner)
Seth P. Waxman (for the Respondent)
Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Petitioner Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) sued Harvard College over its admissions process, alleging that the process violates Title VI of...
2022-10-311h 55Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-707] Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North CarolinaStudents for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 31, 2022.Decided on Jun 29, 2023.
Petitioner: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc..Respondent: University of North Carolina, et al..
Advocates: Patrick Strawbridge (for the Petitioner)
Ryan Y. Park (for the University Respondents)
David G. Hinojosa (for the Student Respondents)
Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Petitioner Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) sued the Uni...
2022-10-312h 44Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-869] Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. GoldsmithAndy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 12, 2022.Decided on May 18, 2023.
Petitioner: Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc..Respondent: Lynn Goldsmith, et al..
Advocates: Roman Martinez (for the Petitioner)
Lisa S. Blatt (for the Respondents)
Yaira Dubin (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Artist Andy Warhol created a series of silkscreen prints and pencil illustrations (“Prince Series”) based on a co...
2022-10-121h 42Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-984] Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. HewittHelix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 12, 2022.Decided on Feb 22, 2023.
Petitioner: Helix Energy Solutions, et al..Respondent: Michael J. Hewitt.
Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioners)
Edwin Sullivan (for the Respondent)
Anthony A. Yang (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Michael J. Hewitt worked on an offshore oil rig managing other employees. His employer, Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., paid Hewitt bas...
2022-10-121h 33Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-468] National Pork Producers Council v. RossNational Pork Producers Council v. Ross
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 11, 2022.Decided on May 11, 2023.
Petitioner: National Pork Producers Council, et al..Respondent: Karen Ross, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food & Agriculture, et al..
Advocates: Timothy S. Bishop (for the Petitioners)
Edwin S. Kneedler (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Michael J. Mongan (for the State Respondents)
Jeffrey A. Lamken (for the Humane Society of the United States, et al., Respondents)
Facts of...
2022-10-112h 12Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-442] Reed v. GoertzReed v. Goertz
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 11, 2022.Decided on Apr 18, 2023.
Petitioner: Rodney Reed.Respondent: Bryan Goertz, et al..
Advocates: Parker Rider-Longmaid (for the Petitioner)
Judd E. Stone, II (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Rodney Reed was sentenced to death in Texas for the 1996 rape and murder of Stacey Stites. He unsuccessfully sought federal post-conviction relief, and when the state asked to set an execution date, Reed requested to have DNA testing conducted on...
2022-10-1159 minSupreme Court Oral Arguments[21-432] Arellano v. McDonoughArellano v. McDonough
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 4, 2022.Decided on Jan 23, 2023.
Petitioner: Adolfo R. Arellano.Respondent: Dennis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
Advocates: James R. Barney (for the Petitioner)
Sopan Joshi (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Adolfo R. Arellano served honorably in the Navy from November 1977 to October 1981. On June 3, 2011—more than 30 years after he was discharged—he applied for disability benefits on the basis of psychiatric disorders that rendered him 100% disabled. He sought...
2022-10-0447 minSupreme Court Oral Arguments[21-1086] Allen v. MilliganAllen v. Milligan
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 4, 2022.Decided on Jun 8, 2023.
Appellant: Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al..Appellee: Evan Milligan, et al..
Advocates: Edmund G. Lacour, Jr. (for the Appellants/Petitioners)
Deuel Ross (for the Appellees)
Abha Khanna (for the Respondents)
Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Appellees/Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
After the 2020 census, Alabama created a redistricting plan for its seven seats in the...
2022-10-041h 53Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-454] Sackett v. Environmental Protection AgencySackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 3, 2022.Decided on May 25, 2023.
Petitioner: Michael Sackett and Chantelle Sackett.Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency.
Advocates: Damien M. Schiff (for the Petitioners)
Brian H. Fletcher (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Michael and Chantall Sackett own a residential lot near Priest Lake, Idaho, and want to build a home there. However, shortly after they began placing sand and gravel, the federal Environmental Protection Agency told them tha...
2022-10-031h 48Supreme Court Oral Arguments[22O145] Delaware v. Pennsylvania and WisconsinDelaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin
Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 3, 2022.Decided on Feb 28, 2023.
Petitioner: State of Delaware.Respondent: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and State of Wisconsin.
Advocates: Neal Kumar Katyal (for Delaware)
Nicholas J. Bronni (for Arkansas et al.)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
MoneyGram Payments Systems, which is headquartered in Delaware, returns unclaimed checks to that state. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin argue that the checks are “money orders” or “similar written instruments,” which federal law requires to go to the sta...
2022-10-031h 08Supreme Court Oral Arguments[21-429] Oklahoma v. Castro-HuertaOklahoma v. Castro-Huerta
Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 27, 2022.Decided on Jun 29, 2022.
Petitioner: State of Oklahoma.Respondent: Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta.
Advocates: Kannon K. Shanmugam (for the Petitioner)
Zachary C. Schauf (for the Respondent)
Edwin S. Kneedler (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta, a non-Native, was convicted in Oklahoma state court of child neglect, and he was sentenced to 35 years. The victim, his stepdaughter, is Native Ame...
2022-04-272h 09